1,497
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Effect of live Saccharomyces cerevisiae (NCDC-49) supplementation on growth performance and rumen fermentation pattern in local goat

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 285-288 | Received 25 May 2012, Accepted 05 Nov 2012, Published online: 16 Apr 2013

Abstract

Twenty female kids of local goats (6.42±0.28 kg, 3-month-old) were divided into two equal groups. Kids in experimental group received Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCDC-49 (5.6×109 cells/head/day) whereas the control was unsupplemented. This study lasted for 120 days. Rumen liquor was collected for three consecutive days after two months and at the end of the experiment before offering feed. The body weight gain, height at withers and heart girth were higher with superior feed conversion in the treatment group. Colony forming units were higher with lower NH3 concentration in yeast culture fed kids. It is concluded that S. cerevisiae NCDC-49 supplementation improved growth and feed conversion efficiency and had some positive influence on the rumen fermentation parameters.

Introduction

Non-pathogenic live micro-organisms are being advocated for incorporation in compounded feeds for increasing animal productivity. Argüello (Citation2011) also discusses that nowadays the relationship between nutrition and pathology plays a central role in the goat research trends for the improvement of the performance. Among the different microbial feed additives, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus oryzae are more effective in rumen, whereas lactobacilli are effective during pre-ruminant stage (Khuntia & Chaudhary Citation2002). S. cerevisiae may multiply in the rumen or stimulate continuous culture and confer beneficial effects on rumen fermentation characteristics (Robinson Citation2002; Sauvant et al. Citation2004) and influence several rumen parameters such as pH and volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentration (Robinson Citation2002). Data from a wide range of controlled studies and field trials suggest that yeast culture (YC) supplements can have a significant role in strategies for economically enhancing the performance of ruminant animals (Panda et al. Citation1995; Dawson & Tricarico Citation2002; Jinturkar et al. Citation2009). The effects of YC on animal productivity are strain-dependant. There is a lot of variation in the performance of same animal fed on different species of probiotic, or even the same species but different strain of probiotic. Agarwal et al. (Citation2002) reported that NCDC-49 has proved to be the best in enhancing the performance of calves. However, few reports using limited strains are available on the performance of goats and there is a scope of further research using more specialised new strains. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to assess the effect of live YC (S. cerevisiae NCDC-49) supplementation on growth performance and ruminal fermentation pattern in local goat.

Materials and methods

Experiment was conducted at Sheep and Goat Farm, LPM division, IVRI, Izatnagar. Twenty female kids of local goats weighing 6.42±0.28 kg (3-month-old) were divided into two groups of 10 each. S. cerevisiae NCDC-49 was supplemented in experimental group, and the second group without any supplementation was control. Standard management practices were followed under uniform conditions.

S. cerevisiae NCDC-49 was procured from NDRI, Karnal, Haryana, and was maintained by repeated sub-culturing on agar slants. The medium consisted of 3, 5, 10 and 15 g of yeast extracts, peptone, glucose and agar, respectively. Distilled water was added to make the volume 1000 ml. A loopful of YC was transferred aseptically to required amount of sterilised broth/liquid medium (without agar) and the tubes were incubated for 24 hours at 39°C. Untreated feed (1000 g) mixed with 1000 ml of tap water was inoculated with the 24-hour-old YC (5% of concentrate) and incubated for 24 hours at 39°C. Fresh culture was prepared after every 15 days. Fermented concentrate feed with colony forming unit (cfu) 5.6×109/g was fed at 150 g/head/day to the kids of treatment group. It was ensured that 150 g fermented concentrate offered to kids was consumed before giving the subsequent unfermented concentrate required by the kid.

Animals were weighed and body measurements taken fortnightly in the morning before offering feed and water. Dry matter intake (DMI) from concentrate and green fodder was calculated separately. All feed samples were analysed for proximate composition as per the standard procedures (AOAC Citation2000).

Rumen liquor was collected through stomach tube for three consecutive days after two months of experimental feeding and at end of the experiment before offering feed for analysing pH, total volatile fatty acids (TVFA, Barnett & Reid Citation1956), ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N, Weatherburn Citation1967), total nitrogen (AOAC Citation2000) and cfu.

The data obtained from the experiment were analysed as per the standard methods of statistical analyses (Snedecor & Cochran Citation1994).

Results and discussion

The mean body weight gain of kids () was significantly (P<0.01) higher in the experimental than to control group. The growth trend was similar to that observed by Haddad and Goussous (Citation2005) and Jinturkar et al. (Citation2009) in lambs supplemented with live yeast.

Table 1. Effect of feeding live YC on growth performance and body measurement (cm) in kids.

The overall feed intake in terms of DMI per kilogram gain was significantly higher in live yeast fed group. The more DMI and relatively more average daily gain (ADG) in live yeast fed groups subsequently lead to improvement in the feed conversion efficiency (FCE) value. Similarly Haddad and Goussous (Citation2005) for lambs and Jinturkar et al. (2009) in goat also reported improvement in FCE due to yeast feeding.

Height at withers and heart girth was statistically (P < 0.05) higher in S. cerevisiae supplemented kids. Whereas, there was no difference in body length () between the groups. All the body measurements are in agreement with Jayabal et al. (Citation2008).

There was no effect on overall pH due to live YC feeding () and this result also supports earlier findings. In contrast, increase of pH in rumen liquor has been reported on YC supplemented bucks and kids (Abd El-Ghani Citation2004; Elseed & Abusamra Citation2007).

Table 2 Effect of feeding live YC on rumen biochemical parameters in SRL of kids.

TVFA concentration was significantly higher (P<0.01) in live YC fed kids at 2 and 4 months. Similar result was reported by Andrighetto et al. (Citation1993) in sheep and observed higher TVFA concentration in rumen liquor when YC was supplemented. A higher production of TVFA in the kids of live yeast fed group indirectly indicated the establishment of cellulolytic bacteria or the stimulation of cellulolytic organism by yeast. Conversely, Kamra et al. (Citation2002) found no effect on TVFA concentration in rumen liquor of the YC group.

Mean NH3-N concentration was lower in live YC fed animals (P<0.01). A similar decrease in ammonia concentration had been observed by Eweedah et al. (Citation2005), Gaafar et al. (Citation2009). The reduction in NH3-N level in the rumen liquor by live yeast feeding is an indication of improvement in protein metabolism rather than reduction in proteolytic, peptidolytic or deaminative activity of the rumen microbes or might be due to increased bacterial growth.

Total nitrogen contents did not differ in the two groups. Maurya (Citation1993) in goats and Prahalada et al. (Citation2001) in calves found no effect of live yeast feeding on the concentration of total nitrogen in strained rumen liquor (SRL). Such findings can be attributed to differences in nitrogen availability in feeds and by nitrogen recycling mechanism in animals.

The cfu per millilitre of S. cerevisiae in SRL of live YC fed group showed significant improvement in experimental group.

These results were supported by the finding of Kumar et al. (Citation1994). In the contrary, Agarwal et al. (Citation2002) observed no effect of probiotic feeding on the log number of cells of lactic acid bacteria, yeast and coliform bacteria in the faeces and rumen liquor of calf at any age when 100 g fermented feed was fed to the animals containing S. cerevisiae NCDC-49 at 106 cfu/ml. The difference in various experiments might be due to the dose of the live yeast and the type of the feed given to the animal.

Incidence of diarrhoea was recorded in kids during the experiment. A total of four kids (40%) in control group suffered from diarrhoea as compared with one kid (10%) in the live yeast fed group during the entire period of the experiment. The incidence of diarrhoea outbreak repeated in control group (40%) with less severity. Kids fed live YC required fewer days of antibiotic therapy than those in control group. Lohnert et al. (Citation2001) and Agarwal et al. (Citation2002) observed lower incidence of diarrhoea after feeding of S. cerevisiae.

It can be concluded that feeding of S. cerevisiae NCDC-49 has a significant effect on higher live weight gain, better feed conversion efficiency and the rumen fermentation pattern, especially NH3-N, TVFA and cells of yeasts.

References

  • Abd El-Ghani AA. 2004. Influence of diet supplementation with yeast culture (Saccharomyces Cerevisiae) on performance of Zaraibi goats. Small Rumin Res. 5:223–229. 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.06.002
  • Agarwal N, Kamra DN, Chaudhary LC, Agarwal I, Sahoo A, Pathak NN. 2002. Microbial status and rumen enzyme profile of crossbred calves fed on different microbial feed additives. Lett Appl Microbiol. 34(5):329–336. 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2002.01092.x
  • Andrighetto I, Bailoni L, Cozzi G, Berzaqhi P. 1993. Effects of yeast culture addition on digestion in sheep fed a high concentrate diet. Small Rumin Res. 12:27–34. 10.1016/0921-4488(93)90035-G
  • Argüello A. 2011. Trends in goat research, a review. J Appl Anim Res. 39(4):429–434. 10.1080/09712119.2011.637362
  • Association of official analytical chemists (AOAC). 2000. Official methods of analysis. 25th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
  • Barnett JGA, Reid RL. 1956. Studies on the production of volatile fatty acids from the grass by rumen liquor in an artificial rumen. Volatile fatty acids production from grass. J Agric Sci. 48:315.
  • Dawson KA, Tricarico J. 2002. The evolution of yeast cultures-20 years of research. In: Navigating from Niche Markets to Mainstream. Proceedings of Alltech's European, Middle Eastern and African Lecture Tour, 2011 Nov 20, All tech UK, p. 26–43.
  • Elseed AMAF, Abusamra RMA. 2007. Effects of supplemental yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture on NDF digestibility and rumen fermentation of forage sorghum hay in Nubian goat's kids. Res J Agric & Biol Sci. 3(3):133–137.
  • Eweedah NM, Mohsen MK, Bassiouni MI, Ali MF, Khalafalla MM. 2005. Performance of lambs fed on rations containing soybean meal treated with formaldehyde and probiotics. 1. Feeding value, rumen fermentation and degradability. Egyptian J Nutr Feed (Special Issue). 8:361.
  • Gaafar HM, Mohi El-Din M, Basiuoni M, El-Riedy KF. 2009. Effect of concentrate to roughage ratio and baker's yeast supplementation during hot season on performance of lactating buffaloes. Slovak J Anim Sci. 42(4):188–195.
  • Haddad SG, Goussous SN. 2005. Effect of yeast culture supplementation on nutrient intake digestibility and growth performance of Awassi lambs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 118:343–348. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.10.003
  • Jayabal T, Murallidharan R, Tensingh-Gnanaraj T, Murugan M. 2008. Growth performance of stall-fed goats under probiotic supplementation. Tamilnadu J Vet Anim Sci. 4(5):179–184.
  • Jinturkar AS, Gujar BV, Chauhan DS, Patil RA. 2009. Effect of feeding probiotics on the growth performance and feed conversion efficiency in Goat. Indian J Anim Res. 43(1):49–52.
  • Kamra DN, Chaudhary LC, Agarwal N, Singh R, Pathak NN. 2002. Growth performance, Nutrient utilization, rumen fermentation and enzyme activities in calves fed on Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplemented diet. Indian J Anim Sci. 72:472–475.
  • Khuntia A, Chaudhary LC. 2002. Performance of male crossbred calves as influenced by substitution of grain by wheat bran and the addition of lactic acid bacteria to diet. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci. 15(2):188–194.
  • Kumar U, Sareen VK, Singh S. 1994. Effect of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae yeast culture supplement on ruminal metabolism in buffalo calves given a high concentrate diet. Anim Prod. 59:209–215. 10.1017/S0003356100007698
  • Lohnert HJ, Ochrimenko WI, Sunder A, Ludke H. 2001. Influence of living yeast cells (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on the rearing of calves. Vitamine-und-Zusatzstoffe-in-der-Ernahrung-von-Mensch-und-Tier-8-Symposium,-26-und-27-September 2001, Jena/Thuringen,-Germany, 497–500.
  • Maurya MS. 1993. Effect of feeding live yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on rumen fermentation and Nutrient digestibility in Goats [ M.V.Sc. Thesis]. Izatnagar (India): IVRI Deemed University.
  • Panda AK, Singh R, Pathak NN. 1995. Effect of dietary inclusion of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on growth performance of crossbred calves. J Appl Anim Res. 7(2):195–200. 10.1080/09712119.1995.9706071
  • Prahalada HK, Kamra DN, Pathak NN. 2001. Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus acidophilus on nutrient utilization and performance of crossbred cattle calves. Int J Anim Sci. 16:103–107.
  • Robinson PH. 2002. Yeast products for growing and lactating dairy cattle: impacts on rumen fermentation and performance. In: Proceeding of the Xll International Meeting in milk and meat production in hot climates, 2002 Nov 3-4 Mexicali, Mexico: University of Baja California, p. 12.
  • Sauvant D, Giger-Reverdin S, Schmidely P. 2004. Rumen acidosis: modeling ruminant response to yeast culture. In: Lyons TP, Jacques KA, editors. Alltech's 20th Annual Symposium Biotechnology Feed Industry. Re-imagining the Feed Industry. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press. p. 221–229.
  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. 1994. Statistical methods. 6th ed. Ames (IA): Lowa state University press.
  • Weatherburn MW. 1967. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Anal Chem. 39:971–974. 10.1021/ac60252a045

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.