Effects of dietary fossil shell flour supplementation on a basal diet, relative feed values, in vitro true digestibility, and rumen fermentation parameters of Dohne-Merino wethers

ABSTRACT

The availability of fossil shell flour(FSF) has increased its use as a natural feed additive in livestock diets. Therefore, identifying its optimum inclusion levels in livestock production is essential for animal productivity. This study investigated the effects of various fossil shell flour (FSF) inclusion levels on in vitro digestibility, relative feed values and rumen parameters of Dohne-Merino wethers. Twenty-four fistulated wethers, averagely 20 ± 1·5 kg body weight, were used in a complete randomized design. They were fed a basal diet without fossil shell flour (control, 0%) or with the addition of 2% FSF (T2), 4% FSF(T3) and 6% FSF (T4) of diet DM for 35 days. The results showed that increasing FSF levels had no effect on ruminal T0C or pH, but Ammonia-N increased (P < 0.01) with increasing FSF. The total molar concentrations of volatile fatty acids (VFA) decreased (P < 0.05) with increasing levels of FSF. IVTDDM, IVTDNDF and IVTDADF decreased to 4% FSF inclusion but tended to increase (P = 0.06) at 6% inclusion. Relative feed values of the diets tended to increase (P = 0.07) by adding fossil shell flour. In conclusion, adding FSF to the sheep diet had no adverse effects on the rumen parameters, though in vitro true digestibility could be reduced.

KEYWORDS:

• Fossil shell flour
• rumen parameters
• in vitro true digestibility
• and feed quality

Introduction

Small ruminants, especially sheep, are reared and maintained in most sub-Saharan African countries on high roughage-based diets with limited access to concentrate supplements (Yang et al., 2018). This has led to reduced production performance, low meat quality, and subsequent economic losses to farmers and the nation. Therefore, improving feed utilization in small ruminant nutrition is one of the essential features that can improve farming profitability. One of the most popular strategies for improving feed utilization is the use of feed additives, including antibiotics, live yeast, enzymes (both fungal and bacterial sources), plant extracts, algae, bentonites, and fossil shell flour (Abdel-Aziz et al., 2015; Durmic et al., 2014; Valdes et al., 2015).

Similarly, Frater (2014) reported that feed additives had been shown to stabilize rumen pH, reduce the risk of acidosis, increase dry matter intake (DMI), reduce methanogenesis, enhance rumen development, and improve meat quality. Manipulating the rumen microbial ecosystem to improve ruminants’ performance is essential for animal nutritionists. Thus, it is essential to identify feed additives that can modify rumen fermentation and efficiency of feed utilization while decreasing nitrogen excretion.

The removal of antibiotic growth-promoters as feed additives in ruminant nutrition in most advanced countries has led to the use of plant extracts, live yeast, enzymes or other organic additives to manipulate ruminal fermentation (Martin and Kadokawa, 2006; McGrath et al., 2018). These manipulations can promote feed efficiency and animal growth, and prevent, control, and treat diseases (Wang and Wang, 2016). The availability and cost implications of plant extracts, live yeast, enzymes, and other bioorganic feed additives have been challenging. However, using organic feed additives such as fossil shell flour in livestock diets is becoming popular recently. This is because it is assumed to leave no residue in the products of animals that consume it, is abundantly available, eco-friendly and is relatively cheap compared to inorganic feed additives (Ikusika et., 2019). Fossil shell flour (FSF) as feed additive increases feed intake, average daily weight gain, and overall performance of livestock because of its mineral richness (mainly silicon-oxide) (Mwanda et al.,2020). However, the effect of various FSF inclusion levels on the rumen environmental and fermentation parameters, in vitro true digestibility, and relative feed value is unknown. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of different inclusion levels of fossil shell flour on feed quality, in vitro true digestibility, and ruminal fermentation parameters in Dohne-Merino wethers. It was hypothesized that fossil shell flour in Dohne Merino wethers’ diets would improve feed quality, in vitro true digestibility, and ruminal fermentation parameters.

Materials and methods

Ethical approval

The University of Fort Hare approved the handling and use of animals (Ethically approved number – MPE041IKU01).

Study site description

The Experiment was conducted at the Small Ruminant Unit of the University of Fort Hare Teaching and Research Farm (Animal Section), Alice, Eastern Cape, South Africa. The research farm is located along Alice-Kings Williams's town, Alice, which lies at a longitude 26o50’ E and latitude of 32°46’ S. The annual rainfall is between 480-490 mm and a temperature range between 24.6 and 11.1 ^oC (average is 17.8 ^oC) at the altitude of 535 meters above sea level. The in vitro true digestibility using Daisy²⁰⁰ incubator was conducted at the Ruminant Nutritional Laboratory of the University of Zululand, Empangeni, KwaZulu Natal Province, South Africa.

Animals, experimental design, and management

Twenty-four single-stage rumen-cannulated Dohne-Merino wethers were randomly allotted into four different diets in a completely randomized design with six wethers per diet. The donor wethers were fed a basal diet without FSF addition 0% or FSF 2%, 4%, or 6% of diet DM. The wethers were fed the experimental diets 35 days before the rumen fluid collection. The ruminal fluid was collected from the cannulated wethers before morning feeding (7:30 am). Approximately 500 ml of rumen fluid were obtained from each fistulated wether, which allowed manually collected ruminal digesta to be strained through 4 layers of cheesecloth.

Experimental diets

The diets for the wethers consisted of concentrate and hay at a 40:60 ratio. The concentrate was made up of maize (8%), sunflower oil cake (10%), molasses (5%), wheat offal (15%), limestone (1.5%), salt 0.3%, and sheep mineral-vitamin premix (0.2%), whereas the hay consisted of 30% teff and 30% Lucerne. The ingredients for concentrate were purchased from Monti Feeds (pty) Ltd, East London, South Africa. In contrast, the teff and Lucerne were purchased from Umtiza Agricultural Products (Pty) Ltd, Kwantu shopping mall, Alice, South Africa. All ingredients were thoroughly milled and mixed evenly to form the basal diet. The feed was formulated to meet the used sheep's nutritional (energy and protein) requirements (NRC, 2007). The four dietary groups were: basal diet (0%); basal diet +2% FSF; basal diet +4% FSF and basal diet + 6% FSF. The wethers were fed at 8:00 h and 15:00 h at 4% of the body weight (on a dry matter (DM) basis). The food-grade Fossil shell flour was purchased from Eco-Earth (Pty) Ltd, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, which produces this product under a license by the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of South Africa. Table 1 shows the feed ingredient and the chemical composition of the experimental diet, while Table 2 shows the mineral content of the dietary fossil shell flour used in this present experiment.

Table 1. Proximate analysis of the experimental diets

Items	Percentage (%)
Maize	8
Sunflower oil cake	10
Molasses	5
Wheat bran	15
Limestone	1.6
Sheep premix	0.2
Salt	0.3
Ground leucine hay (alfalfa)	30
Ground teff hay	30
Chemical composition
Dry matter (% as fed)	95.5
Organic matter	85.22
Energy ME	24.67
Crude Protein	14.56
Ash	10.33
Ether extract	1.7
NDF	44.26
ADF	40.16

Table 2. Mineral composition of Fossil shell flour (FSF).

Items	Quantity
DM %	93
Ca	0.40
% CaO (calculated from %Ca)	0.55
Mg	0.21
%MgO (calculated from %Mg)	0.34
K%	0.16
Cu (mg/kg)	30
Na (mg/kg)	923
Zn(mg/kg)	118
Fe(mg/kg)	7944
Mn(mg/kg)	69
P (as P2O5)	0.037
Sulfate Sulfur (S)%	0.062
Aluminium (Al) %	0.065
Vanadium (V) %	0.00438
Boron (B) %	0.0023

Determination of in vitro True digestibility.

Rumen samples were collected from the twenty -four wethers through the fistulation. One-stage techniques for ruminal fistulation described by Ghazy (2017) were used to collect ruminal fluid. The rumen liquor was collected from the sheep, transferred into a thermos flask pre-warmed to a 39 ^oC and transported immediately to the nutritional laboratory. The incubation procedure was carried out using the DAISY²⁰⁰ Incubator ANKOM Technology (2017) method. Each empty F57 bag (25 µm pore size) was weighed (W1) and recorded. Feed samples of 0.5 g each in triplicate (Coblentz et al., 2019) from each treatment were carefully put into the F57 bags and recorded as W2. Each bag was then heat-sealed, labelled, and evenly distributed on both sides of the Daisy²⁰⁰ incubator digestion jar with one sealed blank bag in all jars as a correction factor (C1). Then, the samples were pre-warmed at 39 ^oC with 1330 ml of buffer solution A (10.0 KH2PO4 + 0.5 MgSO4.7H2O +0.5 NaCl + 0.1 CaCl2.2H20 + 0.5 Urea), 270 ml of buffer solution B (15.0 Na2CO3 + 1.0 Na2S.9H2O) and 400 ml of four-layer cheesecloth filtered rumen fluid. This was poured into the digestion jar, purged with CO₂ for 30 s, and placed into the Daisy incubator at 39 ^oC for 48 h. The Daisy incubator temperature was maintained at 39.5 ^oC ± 0.5. After incubation, the jars were removed from the incubator, the water drained, and the bags were thoroughly rinsed with cold tap water until the water was clean using minimal mechanical agitation. The bags were then dried at 60 ^oC until constant mass, as described by Paula et al. (2017). These samples were further analyzed for fibre using the ANKOM²⁰⁰ Fiber Analyzer to determine the NDF using the procedure described by Van Soest et al. (1991). In vitro NDF weight was recorded as W3. These values were used to calculate IVTD^DM (Invitro true digestibility on a dry matter basis). This formula is taken from the Ankom²⁰⁰ method. $\text{\%}\mathrm{IVTD}={\displaystyle \frac{100-(W_3-(W_1\times C_1)\times 100}{W_2}}$ $\text{\%}IVT{D}^{DM}(DMbasis)={\displaystyle \frac{100-(W_3-(W_1\times C_1)\times 100}{W_2\times DM}}$

Where W1 = empty bag weight W₂=  sample weight

W3 = final bag weight after in vitro and sequential ND treatment

C1  = Blank bag correction (final oven-dried weight/original blank bag weight).

Determination of relative feed values

Relative feed value estimates the digestibility of the dry forage matter and how much the sheep can consume based on its ‘satisfying’ capacity. This was developed in America by Hay Marketing Task Force. It is a key tool in forage marketing and forages quality education. Using the method or equation of Rohweder et al. (1978), the relative feed value (RFV) of the diets was calculated as follows:

DMI = Dry matter intake (Live weight = LW %) = 120/ (NDF %); DMD = Dry matter digestibility (%) = 88.9 – (0.779×ADF %); RFV = Relative feed value = (DMD×DMI)/1.29.

Based on the Quality Grading Standard assigned by the Hay Marketing Task Force of the American Forage and Grassland Council, the RFV was assessed as roughages based on prime >151, 1 (premium) 151-125, 2 (good) 124- 103, 3 (fair) 102-87, 4 (poor) 86-75, 5(reject) < 75.

Determination of rumen fluid parameters (PH, temperature, and volatile fatty acid)

Rumen fluid was collected from twenty-four wethers through a fistula. The pH was immediately measured using a digital pH meter (Sartorius PT-10; Sartorius AG, Göttingen, Germany) and recorded each wether. Ammonia-N was determined from 5 mL of strained (through 4 layers of cheesecloth) rumen fluid pipetted with 1 ml of H2SO4 (20% Conc) for preservation before storing at −20 °C. It was analyzed using the phenol hypochlorite assay (Galyean, 2006).

To analyze ruminal VFA, 5 mL of strained rumen fluid-preserved with 1 mL of an acid solution containing 20% orthophosphoric acid and 0.5 formic acids (5% conc.) and stored at – 20°C was used. After thawing, rumen fluid samples were centrifuged (15,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C), and the supernatant was used to quantify the VFA. The concentration of acetic acid, butyric acid, propionic acid, iso-butyric, valeric acid, and iso-valeric was measured by a gas chromatograph (UNICAM 4600; SB Analytical, Cambridge, UK), following the procedures described by Erwin et al., (1961).

Statistical analysis

Analysis of variance by one-way experimental design within the groups was used to analyze each component's chemical composition, in vitro true digestibility, relative feed values, and rumen parameters (GLM of SAS, 2018). Duncan's multiple range test was done to compare the means, and differences were considered when P < 0.05.

Results

The effects of FSF's varying inclusion levels in diets of Dohne-merino rams on pH, temperature, ammonia-N, and VFA are presented in Table 3. Rumen pH increased slightly with FSF but was not different (P > 0.07) within the FSF inclusion levels. The NH3-N concentration was greater (P < 0.01) in 2% and 6% FSF than in 0% and 4%. With increased FSF inclusion levels, the molar total VFAs, acetic, butyric, and iso-butyric values decreased (P >0.05). The 4% FSF had lesser propionic value compared to 2%, 6%, and 0% FSF (P < 0.05). Molar iso-valeric acid in rumen fluid did not change with FSF inclusion (P > .05). The acetate to propionate ratio was highest at 4% FSF and lowest at 6% FSF.

Table 3. Effects of varying inclusion levels of FSF in diets on rumen parameters of Dohne-merino.

Parameter	0%FSF	2%FSF	4%FSF	6%FSF	SEM	P-Value
NHᴣ -N(mg/dL)	4.94b	8.43a	4.22b	5.33b	1.12	0.01
pH	6.67	6.72	6.74	6.88	0.03	0.07
T°C	34.17	34.33	34.33	34.63	0.13	0.03
Total VFA (mM)	64.72	58.18	54.45	52.91	20.30	0.52
Acetic (mmol/l)	33.48	29.30	27.69	23.62	13.67	0.10
Butyric(mmol/l)	13.66	11.60	11.53	13.09	1.23	0.144
Propionic(mmol/l)	16.61	15.60	13.04	15.55	1.89	0.46
Iso-butyric(mmol/l)	0.65	0.42	0.96	0.04	0.84	0.95
Valeric(mmol/l)	0.12	0.46	0.70	0.46	0.27	0.46
Isovaleric(mmol/l)	0.20	0.53	0.53	0.14	0.02	0.13
Acetate: propionic ratio	2.015	1.846	2.123	1.518	0.82	0.23

Table 4 shows the nutrient composition of the four diets due to varying inclusion levels of FSF. The non-significant difference between crude protein components showed that FSF inclusion of up to 6% does not affect the nutrient content.

Table 4. Chemical composition of the diets with varying FSF inclusion levels.

Levels of FSF inclusion	DM(as feed)	OM	CP	EE	ASH	NDF	ADF	ADL
0%FSF	95.52 ± 1.02	88.27 ± 1.4	14.72 ± 1.05	1.55 ± 1.03	11.72 ± 0.60	44.26 ± 0.9	40.16 ± 5.94	11.07 ± 1.2
2%FSF	95.49 ± 1.02	90.54 ± 1.4	14.57 ± 1.05	1.72 ± 1.03	9.44 ± 0.60	39.2 ± 0.9	31.52 ± 5.94	11.52 ± 1.2
4%FSF	95.89 ± 1.02	90.47 ± 1.4	14.62 ± 1.05	1.90 ± 1.03	9.51 ± 0.60	39.53 ± 0.9	31.64 ± 5.94	11.30 ± 1.2
6%FSF	95.56 ± 1.02	89.74 ± 1.4	15.51 ± 1.05	1.99 ± 1.03	10.29 ± 0.60	38.74 ± 0.9	31.08 ± 5.94	11.34 ± 1.2

DM = dry matter, OM = organic matter,CP = crude protein,EE = ether extract,NDF = neutral detergent fibre, ADF = acid detergent fibre, ADL = acid detergent Lignin

Table 5 shows the in vitro true digestibility of dry matter (IVTD^DM) after adding three amounts of FSF to the diets, which consistently decreased (P < 0.05). IVTD^OM %, IVTD^NDF%, IVTD^ADF% and IVTD^ADL% all decreased at different levels of FSF supplementation compared to the control (0%).

Table 5. In vitro true digestibility of Dohne-merino diets with various levels of Fossil shell flour.

Parameter					SEM	P-Value
	0%FSF	2%FSF	4%FSF	6%FSF
IVTDDM %	62.38a	58.76b	58.13b	55.4c	1.19	0.05
IVTDOM %	64.38a	60.83b	59.98b	57.21c	1.14	0.001
IVTDNDF%,	39.03	34.79	36.67	38.26	3.12	≥0.05
IVTDADF%	34.44	31.87	34.58	35.82	2.84	≥0.05
IVTDADL%	12.60b	12.43b	19.02a	16.66ab	2.16	0.0001

IVTD^DM  = In-vitro true digestibility dry matter, IVTD^OM  = In-vitro true digestibility organic matter, IVTD^NDF = In-vitro true digestibility neutral detergent fibre, IVTD^ADF=  In-vitro true digestibility acid detergent fibre IVTD^ADL=  In-vitro true digestibility acid detergent lignin

IVTD^DM: in vitro true dry matter digestibility; IVTD^OM: in vitro true organic matter digestibility IVTD^NDF: in vitro true neutral detergent fibre digestibility; IVTD^ADF: in vitro true acid detergent fibre digestibility; IVTD^ADL: in vitro true acid detergent lignin digestibility.

The effects of including various FSF amounts into Dohne-merino wether diets on in vitro true digestibility and feed quality as defined by their RFV content are presented in Table 6. Relative feed value (RFV) and DMI tended to increase (P ≤0.05) as the amounts of FSF added to the diets increased (Table 6).

Table 6. Effects of FSF inclusion levels on diet quality.

Levels of FSF inclusion	DMD%	DMI(%LW)	RFV	RFV -Quality	%INVTD
0%	62.07ab	3.10a	149.95a	1-good	83.44a
2%	64.07	3.50	175.60	Prime	87.48a
4%	58.07b	3.47a	155.99a	Prime	84.53a
6%	60.99ab	3.15a	150.08a	1-Premium	86.85a
SEM	2.21	0.32	17.90		2.89
P-value	0.05	0.08	0.07		0.05

DMD = dry matter digestibility, DMI = dry matter intake, RFV = relative feed value

Discussion

Mean ruminal pH and temperature values were within the normal physiological range of 6.1–6.8 in all experimental lambs, as observed by Van Soest (1994). Imani Rad et al. (2016) and McDonald et al. (2011) reported that factors such as DMI, type of diet, addition or non- addition of an additive, hay to concentrate ratio, and the physical structure of the diets, digestibility, and feeding method affect rumen pH. In this study, these factors were not different among the dietary treatments; thus, there was no change (P ≥0.05) in the rams’ rumen pH. This means that the inclusion of FSF in the diets of Dohne-merino wethers maintained the ruminal pH and ruminal metabolism. This could be because FSF has a buffering capacity, which helps stabilize the rumen pH. The mean ammonia concentration for 2% and 6% FSF values obtained from this study were within the minimum concentration of 5 mg/dL required for maximal growth of microbes in animals’ rumen (Sinclair DA, Dawes IW, 1993). The concentration of ammonia-N was affected by the inclusion of FSF at 2% and 6% in the diets of Dohne -merino wethers, compared to the 0% level (P < 0.05). The reason could be that since FSF increased protein available in the rumen (McDonald et al., 2011), it follows that there would be degradation of excess crude protein in the rumen, leading to ammonia accumulation in the rumen. This will enhance rumen protozoa growth. This aligns with Pal et al. (2010) study, which reported that when feed protein degradation is depressed in the rumen, protozoa growth is hindered because of a decrease in rumen ammonia concentration.

The main supply of energy to ruminants comes from the end products of fermentation by various microorganisms in the rumen, which is VFA (Imani-Rad et al., 2016; Van Soest, 1994). Hence, sheep performance and productivity can be enhanced through diets that promote higher production of VFA compared to lesser amounts (Penner, 2014). Though the amount of total molar VFA observed in this study was reducing as FSF inclusion levels increased, it still falls within the normal ranges of 60–150 mmol/L as reported by Imani-Rad et al. (2016) and.

Martínez-Fernández et al. (2014). Also, the lowering of total VFAs, acetic acid, butyric, and iso-butyric acid concentration as FSF increases were similar to Partanen and Jalava's (2005) findings. The reduction in molar total VFAs and individuals in rumen fluid may be due to FSF's antimicrobial effects on rumen bacteria. There might be a change in the metabolic pathway through which microbes utilize substrates, reducing the typical VFA by-products (Baltran and Martins, 2015; Fernandez et al., 1998; Ikusika et al., 2019). However, the net reduction is minimal, as the VFA concentration was still within the normal VFA mM ratio.

The diet consisted of maize, sunflower oil cake, wheat bran, molasses, limestone, salt, and premix, while the hay was a combination of teff and Lucerne in equal proportion. Teff and Lucerne have been reported to be the right combination for sheep production, positively impacting performance (Kafilzadeh et al., 2012). The NDF, ADF, and ADL observed in this study are within the normal range reported by Gebremariam et al. (2014) on teff and Lucerne. The diet CP% (14.7) was above the average CP% (∼7.5) for ruminant nutrition, as reported by Fitwi and Tadesse (2013). The supplemented feed CP% varied from 15.52 compared to the 55 g/kg DM for teff and 118.0 g/kgDM for Lucerne reported by Ghasemi et al. (2012). This could be due to the addition of concentrate to the diets. The major component of the concentrate, such as sunflower cake and maize, were richer in crude protein than teff and Lucerne. The similarity in the values of the various components shows uniformity in the basal diets, and the only source of variation can simply be FSF levels. However, adding FSF at different inclusion levels in this study did not affect the diets’ chemical composition.

Different feed additives to improve fibrous feeds’ digestibility in ruminants have been reported severally (Aboagye et al., 2015; Kondratovich et al., 2017; Salman et al., 2017). However, there was very little information on using fossil shell flour as an additive for improving rumen parameters and influencing true digestibility and relative feed values in sheep. Emeruwa (2016) reported a significant difference in sheep supplemented with varying amounts of FSF and the control for in vitro organic matter digestibility. It was observed that treatment with 2% inclusion levels had the highest INVTD^OM % (62.19%) among all the treatments. This was contrary to the present study's findings, which show that the control treatment had the highest INVTD^OM % values. The difference could be attributed to the different feed ingredients used in the two experiments. Both concentrate and hay were used in this trial, while Emeruwa (2016) used concentrate feed only.

The IVTD^NDF% is an essential parameter for determining feed intake and quality (Oba and Allen, 2011; Salman et al., 2017). In this study, the values of IVTDN^DF% tended to be higher in the 0% inclusion level than 2%, 4%, and 6% FSF. This means that digestibility decreased with increased FSF. This could be because of the antimicrobial properties of FSF that might have reduced the activities of the ruminal microorganism, such as Ruminococcus albus, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens that degrade fibrous feeds. The action mechanism was unknown but could be associated with FSF's ion exchange and absorption property, altering the cells’ electrolyte balance. This interruption can disturb ions’ trans-membrane movement and intracellular equilibrium, exhausting and causing some microorganisms’ death.

The observation in this study was similar to the reduction in NDF and ADF values obtained in a trial conducted by Anassori et al. (2012). They investigated the effects of different feed additives on INVTD^NDF% and INVTD^ADF %, and it was reported that Monessin and essential oil decreased NDF and ADF degradability in the Daisy200 digestion method. The reason is that Monessen has an inhibiting effect on gram-positive microorganisms, which include most of the cellulolytic bacteria, capable of hydrolyzing fibre, thereby reducing NDF degradability. This strongly backed FSF's antimicrobial potential, as Ikusika et al.(2019) stated; hence the decrease in INVTD observed in this study.

The feed quality improved with an increase in FSF addition in the diets. All the treatments generally proved to have premium feed quality, as demonstrated by the relative feed value. There was no significant difference between them. The premium-rated feed values obtained in this study resulted from an increase in DMD and DMI values. The inclusion of FSF increases the feed intake of withers, dry matter intake, and dry matter digestibility. The mechanism explaining this was unclear but was associated with FSF richness in minerals such as Na, Ca, Mg, Cu, and Fe (Adebiyi et al., 2009).

Moreover, these minerals seem to increase the palatability of the diets (Desimone et al., 2013; Garmyn et al., 2011), hence, the high feed intake value. This agreed with the finding of Silva et al. (2015) and Moyo et al. (2019), who both reported that mineral supplementation has positive effects on feeding acceptance vis-a-vis the feed intake and the DMI. Similarly, Sahoo et al. (2011) reported that adding mineral supplements to sheep's diets increases the animal's preference for such feed. The addition of FSF in the diets also increased INVTD%. Diets supplemented with FSF have higher INVTD numerical values than the non-supplemented diets (0%). Nevertheless, no significant difference was observed.

Conclusion

From this research work, it may be inferred that adding FSF at varying levels to wethers’ diets containing concentrate and hay (teff and Lucerne) improved feed intakes and feed values of the diets. Also, it has no adverse effects on ruminal parameters and in vitro true digestibility. Therefore, FSF can potentially enhance the production performance of Dohne Merino wethers. The FSF inclusion levels up to 4% could be further explored in vivo experiments.

Authors contribution

Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Resources; Software; Supervision, and writing of original draft were carried out by Olusegun Ikusika, while supervision and validation were done Conference T.Mpendulo

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledged the efforts of some staff in the Department of Livestock and Pasture Science, University of Fort Hare, for their support.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability

Data will be available upon request.

Additional information

Funding

The South African Medical Research Council sponsored the research (SAMRC/UFH/P790).