Abstract
The present geomorphic study analyzes the morphometric anomalies of the lateritic badlands (West Bengal, India) to understand the erosion intensity, triggering factors and landscape evolution using the ALOS AW3D30 DEM and quantitative techniques of various hydro-geomorphic processes (viz., basin morphometry, rainfall-runoff simulation, geomorphic threshold, erosion indices, sediment yield, SPI, and STI etc.). The GIS-based analysis reflects that there is the requitement of minimum drainage area (i.e. 55.71–349.01 m2) to maintain one metre of gully channel in the basins which have the network density of 2.86–13.76 km km−2. The critical slope (i.e. geomorphic threshold) of badland terrain varies from 0.0222 to 0.0407 metre metre−1, having dominance of overland flow erosion to initiate gully heads. The basin-wise SCS-CN and USLE coupling estimates that within the daily rainfall range of 11.41–66.41 mm day−1, the potential sediment yield of gully basins varies from 2.15 to 9.10 t ha−1. The SL index (i.e. 0.81–47.32 m) diagram reflects the beats of gully energy profile due to stream erosion enhancement, slope steepness, resistance of underlying lithologies and active tectonics. Hypsometric integral values of the gully basins, ranging from 0.4 to 0.6, emphasize a low entropy-based fluvial system and development of mature-youthful landform stage. The evolutionary stages of badlands are explained here by the connectivity model and hillslope – gully – river coupling system, showing a quasi-equilibrium to complex stage of landscape development at present.
Acknowledgments
The authors are indebted to Dr Sanat Kumar Guchhait (Professor, Department of Geography, The University of Burdwan), Dr Suvendu Roy (Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Kalipada Ghosh Tarai Mahavidyalaya), Dr Pravat Kumar Shit (Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Raja N. L. Khan Women’s College) and Dr Aznarul Islam (Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Aliah University) their valuable articles, field photographs and suggestions in the field-based data collection and analysis. At last, the authors are thankful to Dr Bradley C. Rundquist (Editor) and reviewers of Geocarto International for their suggestions and comments.
Disclosure statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.