![Sample our Politics & International Relations journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5947/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Politics-International-Relations.jpg"})
Abstract
This article examines South Africa's engagement with the rest of the African continent in the realm of peace and security since 1994. It notes that despite expectations from the international community as well as its own policy documents that South Africa would promote human rights on the continent, this has not occurred in a substantial manner. Pretoria has been naïve in its mediation attempts, or worse. Pretoria's ambiguous position in relation to human rights is not only a product of domestic variables but also its own lack of capacity, especially on the military front. These domestic constraints are reinforced at a regional level where structures like the African Standby Forces are little more than ‘paper tigers’. This serves to reinforce the status quo, ultimately undermining human security and escalating prospects for future conflict. At the same time the article does point to some positive developments arising from the Zuma administration in its engagement on the African continent in its efforts to secure human security for Africa's citizens.
Acknowledgements
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the conference ‘South Africa in the world: A post-transition foreign policy’, hosted by the South African Institute of International Affairs, South Africa, London, 22 May 2009.
Notes
1. Mandela N, ‘South Africa's future foreign policy’, Foreign Affairs, 72, 5, pp. 87–8
2. Quoted in Nathan L, ‘Explaining South Africa's position on Sudan and Darfur’, paper presented to the Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House, London, 12 February 2008, <www.chathamhouse.org.uk> (accessed 4 April 2009).
3. King A, ‘Key note address’, paper delivered to the Seminar on the Image of the United Nations in South Africa, co-hosted by the UN Department of Public Information and the Centre for Southern African Studies, University of the Western Cape, Somerset-West, 8 February 1994, p. 3.
4. South African Institute of International Affairs, ‘South Africa in Africa: An assessment’, South African Foreign Policy Monitor, March–April 2008, p. 2.
5. Schoeman M & C Alden, ‘The hegemon that wasn't: South Africa's foreign policy towards Zimbabwe’, Strategic Review of Southern Africa, May 2003, p. 2.
6. Mandela N, op. cit., p. 87.
7. Department of Foreign Affairs, ‘Overview of the Strategic Priorities of the Department of Foreign Affairs for the Period 2008–2011’, Pretoria, pp. 6–8.
8. Matlosa K, ‘Democracy and conflict resolution in Africa: Challenge for post-conflict reconstruction’, Conflict Trends, 1, 2006, p. 12.
9. Habib A, ‘South Africa's foreign policy: Hegemonic aspirations, neoliberal orientations and global transformation’, 2008, p. 7, <www.giga-hamburg.de/english/content/rpn/conferences/habib.pdf> (accessed 20 April 2009).
10. South African Institute of International Affairs, 2008, op. cit., p. 2.
11. South African Institute of International Affairs, 2008, op. cit., p. 3.
12. Weekly Mail & Guardian, ‘Naïve South Africa must not adopt missionary position’, 29 May 2007.
13. IRIN News, ‘Weakened UNITA may cease hostilities’, 6 March 2002, <http://www.irinnews.org/Report.aspx?ReportId=30619> (accessed 16 August 2002).
14. Shortly after the death of UNITA leader Jonas Savimbi and his Deputy Admiral Dembo, the remaining UNITA leadership realised that they were in a weakened military and political position vis-à-vis the MPLA government. Moreover, with the diminished foreign support the war could not be further prosecuted and UNITA opted to surrender. To read more on this please see Solomon H, Angola: A Case Study of Aggression, Avarice and Anguish, FAST Country Risk Profile. Berne: Swiss Peace Foundation, 2000.
15. Solomon H, ‘From New York to Lusaka and beyond: Angola's tortuous road to peace’, Africa Insight, 32, 4, 2000, p. 37.
16. VOA News.com, ‘South Africa unrepentant over UN Security Council role’, 20 February 2009, <http://www1.voanews.com/english/news/a-13-2009-02-20-voa23-68712827.html> (accessed 14 April 2010).
17. VOA News.com, ‘South Africa unrepentant over UN Security Council role’, 20 February 2009, <http://www1.voanews.com/english/news/a-13-2009-02-20-voa23-68712827.html> (accessed 14 April 2010).
18. Coady A & H Solomon, ‘Deconstructing constructive engagement: Examining Mbeki's South African foreign policy towards Zimbabwe’, World Affairs, 13, 1, 2009, p. 69.
19. Quoted in Nathan L, op. cit.
20. Hutson HPW, Rhodesia – Ending an Era. London: Springwood Books, 1978, p. 138.
21. Geldenhuys D, ‘Ten crises in South Africa's international relations’, International Affairs Bulletin, 13, 3, 1989, p. 93.
22. The Citizen, ‘Myanmar can learn from South Africa’, 6 May 2010, p. 3.
23. United Nations Development Programme, ‘Is Zuma's foreign policy a change of style or substance?’, United Nations Development Programme: South Africa, <http://www.undp.org.za/index.php/democratic-governance-news/232-is-zumas-foreign-policy> (accessed 5 May 2010).
24. United Nations Development Programme, ‘Is Zuma's foreign policy a change of style or substance?’, United Nations Development Programme: South Africa, <http://www.undp.org.za/index.php/democratic-governance-news/232-is-zumas-foreign-policy> (accessed 5 May 2010), p. 2.
25. ‘Desperate Zimbabweans Head South’, IWPR Institute for War and Peace Reporting,ZIM issue 56, 11 April 2008, <http://www.iwpr.net/report-news/desperate-zimbabweanshead-south> (accessed 11 June 2010).
26. Department of Foreign Affairs, op. cit., pp. 6–8.
27. Xolela Mangcu, ‘A new foreign policy for Jacob Zuma's South Africa’, The Brookings Institution, 20 July 2009, p. 1, <http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0720_south_africa_mangcu.aspx?p=1>.
28. Nathan L, op. cit.
29. Nathan L, op. cit, p. 2.
30. Ankomah B, ‘Baffour's beefs’, New African, No. 483, April 2009, p. 8;Weekly Mail & Guardian, ‘Naïve South Africa must not adopt missionary position’, 29 May 2007.
31. Quoted in Schoeman M & C Alden, op. cit., p. 2.
32. South African Institute of International Affairs, ‘Zimbabwe is the new Bantustan’, South African Foreign Policy Monitor, January–February 2007, p. 1.
33. South African Institute of International Affairs, ‘Zimbabwe is the new Bantustan’, South African Foreign Policy Monitor, January–February 2007, p. 1; Solomon H, ‘Ten principles of best practice engagement for Africa and South Africa’, in Southall R (ed.) South Africa's Role in Conflict Resolution and Peacemaking in Africa. Cape Town: Nelson Mandela Foundation and Human Sciences Research Council Press, 2006, p. 116; Talbott S, ‘Zimbabwe: Shadows and lies, recollections of Robert Mugabe’, PBS Frontline World, <http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/zimbabwe504/profile.html> (accessed 4 May 2010).
34. Bell P, ‘Steering an erratic course through foreign waters’, Africa Today, 3, 2, 1997, p. 16.
35. Solomon H, 2006, op. cit., p. 116.
36. Nathan L, op. cit.
37. Quoted in Solomon H, ‘Zimbabwe: God will decide’, Eurasia Critic Magazine, August 2008, p. 39.
38. New Partnership for Africa's Development, ‘African Post-Conflict Reconstruction Policy Framework’, NEPAD Secretariat, Governance, Peace and Security Programme, Midrand, South Africa.
39. New Partnership for Africa's Development, ‘African Post-Conflict Reconstruction Policy Framework’, NEPAD Secretariat, Governance, Peace and Security Programme, Midrand, South Africa, p. 3.
40. New Partnership for Africa's Development, ‘African Post-Conflict Reconstruction Policy Framework’, NEPAD Secretariat, Governance, Peace and Security Programme, Midrand, South Africa, p. 23.
41. Murithi T, ‘The AU/NEPAD post-conflict reconstruction policy: An analysis’, Conflict Trends, 1, 2006, p. 19.
42. Anderlini SN & J El-Bushra, ‘Post-Conflict Reconstruction’, 2005, p. 61, <www.huntalternatives.org/download/39_post_conflict.pdf> (accessed 27 April 2009).
43. Anderlini SN & J El-Bushra, ‘Post-Conflict Reconstruction’, 2005, p. 61, <www.huntalternatives.org/download/39_post_conflict.pdf> (accessed 27 April 2009), p. 62.
44. Berdal M and DM Malone, Greed and Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars. London: Lynne Rienner, 2000, p. 2.
45. Solomon H, S Kelly & I Motsi, Towards Sustainable Peace in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Centre for International Political Studies, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 2008, p. 41.
46. Matlosa, op. cit., p. 14.
47. Ballentine K & G Nitzschke, ‘The political economy of civil war and conflict transformation’, in Fischer M & B Schmelzle (eds), Transforming War Economies: Dilemmas and Strategies. Berlin: Berghof Research Centre for Constructive Conflict Management, 2005, pp. 11–35.
48. Murithi T, op. cit., p. 19.
49. Ryan S, ‘Preventive diplomacy, conflict prevention and ethnic conflict’, in Carment D & P James (eds) Peace in the Midst of Wars: Preventing and Managing Ethnic Conflicts. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, p. 88.
50. Williams R, ‘Peace operations and the South African armed forces: Prospects and challenges’, Strategic Review for Southern Africa, 12, 2, 1995, pp. 104–5.
51. Solomon H, 2006, op. cit., p. 116.
52. Stedman SJ, ‘International implementation of peace agreements in civil wars: Findings from a study of sixteen cases’, in Crocker CA, FO Hampson & P Aall (eds), Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2001.
53. SADC, ‘Protocol on Politics, Defence and Security Cooperation’. Gaborone, Botswana: SADC, p. 11.
54. SADC, ‘Protocol on Politics, Defence and Security Cooperation’. Gaborone, Botswana: SADC, p. 2.
55. Haas EB, The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces 1950–1957. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1958, p. 16.
56. Le May J, ‘Nearly half of SA army not fit for combat’, The Independent on Saturday, 13 July 2002, <http://www.independentonsaturday.co.za/index.php?fSectionId=&fArticleId=ct20020713233046795S650627>.
57. Engelbrecht L, ‘Ban asks for more SA peacekeeping support’, defenceWeb, 26 February 2009, <http://www.defenceweb.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1182&catid=55:SANDF&Itemid=108>.
58. ‘Ambush in Sudan’, Department of Defence, 5 July 2006, <http://www.dod.mil.za/media/media2006/media_5jul06no.2.htm> (accessed 5 May 2010).
59. ‘SANDF – rape in the DRC’, The Star, 8 November 2008, <http://www.thestar.co.za/index.php?fSectionID-129&fArticleId=2146949> (accessed 5 May 2010).
60. See Institute for Security Studies (ISS), South African Army Vision 2020, Volumes 1 and 2, Pretoria: ISS, 2008.
61. South Africa extends Diplomatic Cover to Bashir, Nathan L, ‘Explaining South Africa's Position on Sudan and Darfur’, Transcript from conference on this subject held at Chatham House, London, 12 February 2008, <www.cmi.no/sudan/doc/?id=934> (accessed 12 June 2010).
62. Voice of America, ‘South African president promises impartiality in mediating Zimbabwe political crisis’, 13 April 2010, <www1.voanews.com/zimbmabwe/news/politics/South-African-President-Zuma-Says> (accessed 29 April 2010).
63. United Nations Development Programme, op. cit., p. 1.
64. SA Training Congolese soldiers in the DRC, The Citizen, ‘SANDF peacekeeping ops extended’, The Citizen, 23 March 2006, <http://www.citizen.co.za/index/article.aspx?pDesc=14943,1,22> (accessed 8 June 2010).
65. Statebuilding in Sudan, Mashabane MN, Transcript of Minister Maite Nkoana Mashabane's press comments upon conclusion of the Courtesy call on President of Government of Southern Sudan, Salva Kirr Mayardit in Juba, South Sudan, 17 September 2009, Department of International Relations and Cooperation, Republic of South Africa, <http://www.dfa.gov.za/docs/speeches/2009/mash0917.html> (accessed 8 June 2010).
66. Interview with Dr John Yoh, Government of Southern Sudan Liaison Office, Pretoria, 12 March 2010.