Public administration and service delivery reforms: a post-1994 South African case

Abstract

This paper is an analysis of South Africa's public service improvement strategies since 1994. It first describes the historical factors that underpinned South Africa's service delivery initiatives before 1994. It is argued that the pre-1994 public service sector was racialised and highly politicised, as opposed to being people-centred and service delivery oriented. The transition to democracy in 1994 necessitated a complete revision of South Africa's public administrative system in order to meet the developmental challenges of service delivery needs. However, this transition also coincided with global reform initiatives that were taking place in the public sector, as informed by the new public management (NPM) paradigm with its emphasis on cost effectiveness, accountability and transparency. The primary argument of the paper is that commendable legislative reforms have been enacted in South Africa's public administration system in the post-1994 period, based on the NPM, but the fragility of the state bureaucracy as manifested in the silo approach characterising the South African government operations, as well as capacity limitations, encumbers the success of these reforms. The Community Development Worker (CDW) programme, operating in South Africa's Eastern and Western Cape Provinces, is used as a case study to illustrate this argument. A brief look at India's experience of the NPM also informs the discussion. The significance of the case study lies in the fact that it was conceived in the interest of increased responsiveness and accessibility to government services, a vital pillar of the NPM framework.

Keywords:

• new public management
• service delivery
• community development workers
• public administration
• South Africa

Notes

1. Maphai V, ‘The civil service: Transition and affirmative action’, in Hugo P (ed.), Redistribution and Affirmative Action: Working on South Africa. Johannesburg: Macmillan Publishers, 1992.

2. Schwella E, ‘Public sector policy in the new South Africa: A critical review’, Public Performance & Management Review, 24, 4, 2001, pp. 367–88.

3. Schwella E, ‘Public sector policy in the new South Africa: A critical review’, Public Performance & Management Review, 24, 4, 2001, p. 379

4. Schwella E, ‘Public sector policy in the new South Africa: A critical review’, Public Performance & Management Review, 24, 4, 2001, p. 368

5. Maserumule M, ‘The Changing Role of the South African Public Service Commission during the Period 1990–2000’, Master of Arts Thesis, University of South Africa, 2002, <http://uir.unisa.ac.za/dspace/handle/10500/881> (accessed 30 April 2010).

6. Gerth HH & CW Mills, eds., Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959.

7. Maserumule, op. cit.

8. Republic of South Africa, African National Congress (ANC), The Reconstruction and Development Program: A Policy Framework. Johannesburg: Umanyano, 1994

9. Larbi G, The New Public Management Approach and Crisis States. UNRISD Discussion Paper No. 112. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, 1999.

10. Hughes O, Public Administration and Management. An Introduction. London: Macmillan Press Ltd, 1994, p. 58.

11. Osborne D & T Gaebler, Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley, 1992.

12. Hughes O, op. cit.

13. Republic of South Africa, Presidential Review Commission (PRC), Developing a Culture of Good Governance: Report of the Presidential Review Commission on the Reform and Transformation of the Public Service in South Africa. Presented to the President of South Africa, Mr NR Mandela, 27 February 1998, <www.polity.org.za/polity/govdocs/reports/pressreview/index.html> (accessed 4 February 2010).

14. Republic of South Africa, Presidential Review Commission (PRC), Developing a Culture of Good Governance: Report of the Presidential Review Commission on the Reform and Transformation of the Public Service in South Africa. Presented to the President of South Africa, Mr NR Mandela, 27 February 1998, <www.polity.org.za/polity/govdocs/reports/pressreview/index.html> (accessed 4 February 2010).

15. Hughes O, op. cit.

16. Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances, Service Delivery Excellence Model ‘Sevottam’. New Delhi: Government of India, 2004

17. Transparency International, India. ‘Regional Workshop on Improving Governance, Methods for Improving Governance and Some Exemplary Initiatives’, 2005, <www.transparency.org/regional_pages/asia_pacific/previous_projects/politics/corruption_in_politics_archive>

18. Publication of launching of the National Mobilization Goals Quality, ‘It shows, it demands, alive. Who makes Brazil is you’, Brazilian Program of the Quality and Productivity, Brasilia, May 1998.

19. Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA), Access Strategy Discussion Document, September 2005, Version 3. DPSA, pp. 21–2.

20. Drucker PF, Electronic Governance in Context. Electronic Governance and Electronic Democracy: Living and Working in the Connected World. Commonwealth Centre for Electornic Governance, 2001.

21. <http://www.gov.za/>.

22. See Speakers Notes for Mr Sello Moloto, the premier of Limpopo, during the launch of Batho Pele Gateway Portal, Batho Pele Service Centres, <http://www.info.gov.za/speeches/2004/04082009451001.htm>.

23. See the article by Ivan Rugema discussing the subject of universal access to telecommunications services in South Africa which appears in this issue. Rugema I, ‘Balancing domestic regulation and trade liberalisation under the GATS: universal access issues in South Africa's telecoms sector’, South African Journal of International Affairs, 17, 2.

24. See for example the Indian government website http://www.irctc.co.in.

25. See for example <http://topics.developmentgateway.org/ict/highlights/viewHighlight.do~activeHighlightId=107781activeHighlightId=107781>.

26. For more information see McLennan A. & P Fitzgerald (eds) The Mount Grace Papers. The New Public Administration Initiative and the Mount Grace Consultation. Johannesburg: Public and Development Management Programme, University of Witwatersrand, 1991.

27. Olowu D, ‘Introduction new public management: An African reform paradigm?’, Africa Development, 27, 3–4, 2002, pp. 1–16.

28. Levin R, ‘Building service effectiveness. Integrated governance and the developmental state’, Service Delivery Review, 3, 1, 2004.

29. Republic of South Africa, Presidential Review Commission (PRC), 1998, op. cit.

30. Mhone G, ‘Democratisation, economic liberalisation and the quest for sustainable development’, in Mhone G & O Edigheji, Governance in the New South Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press, 2003, p. 24.

31. Republic of South Africa, Presidential Review Commission (PRC), 1998, op. cit.

32. Gasper D, ‘Fashion, learning and values in public management: Reflections on South African and international experience’, Africa Development, 27, 3–4, 2002.

33. Hughes O, op. cit.

34. Republic of South Africa, Presidential Review Commission (PRC), 1998, op. cit.

35. Republic of South Africa (RSA), White Paper on Transformation of the Public Service. Government Gazette Vol. 365, No. 16838. Pretoria: Government Printers, 1995.

36. Gasper D, op. cit.

37. Fraser-Moleketi G & H van Dyk-Robertson, ‘The interaction between governance, policy and public service reform in democratic South Africa’, in Olowu D & R Mukwena (eds), Governance in Southern Africa and Beyond: Experiences of Institutional and Public Policy Reforming in Developing Countries. Gamsberg: Macmillan Publishers, 2003.

38. Thusong Centres are one-stop, integrated community centres which empower poor communities by providing access to government information and resources for development. They are a collaborative venture between the three spheres of government (national, provincial and local government), communities, parastatals, organs of civil society such as NGOs and the private sector. The programme was initiated by the government in 1999 as a channel for the implementation of development communication and information, and to introduce government services to rural communities. The programme was also adopted to further the objectives of establishing an integrated delivery of public services.

39. Republic of South Africa, Department of Public Service and Administration, Report on the Implementation and Promotion of Batho Pele. Pretoria: Government Printers, 2004.

40. Republic of South Africa, Office of the Presidency, State of the Nation Address of the President of South Africa, Thabo Mbeki 14 February. Cape Town: Houses of Parliament, 2003.

41. Izimbizo is the Nduni word for an indigenous method of government consultation with communities.

42. Republic of South Africa, 2003, op. cit.

43. Republic of South Africa, 2003, op. cit.

44. Republic of South Africa, Department of Public Service and Administration, About CDWs, 2007, <www.dpsa.gov.za/CDW/index.asp> (accessed 29 January 2010).

45. Western Cape Provincial Government (WCPG), Community Development Workers Discussion Document. Cape Town: WCPG, 2004.

46. Western Cape Provincial Government (WCPG), Community Development Workers Discussion Document. Cape Town: WCPG, 2004.

47. Western Cape Provincial Government (WCPG), Community Development Workers Discussion Document. Cape Town: WCPG, 2004.

48. <http://www.dpsa.gov.za/cdw/123.asp>

49. <http://www.dpsa.gov.za/cdw/123.asp>

50. South African Management and Development Institute (SAMDI), Evaluation of the Community Development Worker (CDW) Program. Pretoria: SAMDI, 2005.

51. Western Cape Provincial Government, op. cit.

52. Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, State of Local Government in South Africa Overview Report: National State of Local Government Assessments Working Documents 21–22 October. Boksburg: Birchwood Conference Centre, 2009.

53. Mackay K & I Davids, Community Workers Alienated, 2007 <www.fcr.org.za/publications/articles/newspaper-articles-2007/community-development-workers_article.pdf/view> (accessed 29 January 2010).

54. Foundation for Contemporary Research, Unpacking the Relationships Around Community Development Workers (CDWs) in the Western Cape Province. Cape Town: FCR, 2006a, <www.fcr.org.za/publications/case-studies/cdws-and-municipal-stakeholders-inwestern-cape-province.pdf/View> (accessed 29 January 2010).

55. Republic of South Africa, Department of Public Service and Administration, op. cit.

56. Foundation for Contemporary Research, 2006a, op. cit.

57. Foundation for Contemporary Research, 2006a, op. cit.

58. Foundation for Contemporary Research, 2006a, op. cit.

59. Municipalities in South Africa are a division of local government that lie one level down from provincial government, forming the lowest level of democratically elected government structures in the country. The office speaker within the municipality performs the duties and exercises the powers delegated to the speaker in terms of section 59 of the Local Government Municipal Systems Act 2000.

60. Foundation for Contemporary Research, CDW Summary Report. Cape Town: FCR, 2006b, <www.fcr.org.za/projects/past-projects/participatory-democracy-projects/community-development-workers/community-development-workers/?searchterm=CDW%20summary%20report> (accessed 29 January 2010).

61. Foundation for Contemporary Research, 2006a, op. cit.

62. Foundation for Contemporary Research, 2006a, op. cit.

63. See Section 4 of the Intergovernmental Relations Framework Act, 2005 (Act 13 of 2005), <[0]www.capegateway.gov.za/other/2009/12/ifra.pdf>.

64. Republic of South Africa, Department of Provincial and Local Government (DPLG), Practitioners Guide to the Intergovernmental Relations System in South Africa, Intergovernmental Relations Toolkit, Department of Provincial and Local Government, 2007.

65. Republic of South Africa, Department of Provincial and Local Government (DPLG), 15 Year Review Report on The State of Intergovernmental relations in South Africa, 2008, <www.thepresidency.gov.za/docs/reports/15year_review/governance/igr.pdf> (accessed 30 April 2010).

66. Republic of South Africa, Department of Provincial and Local Government (DPLG), The Implementation of the Intergovernmental Relations Framework, An Integral Report, 2005/06–2006/07, <www.info.gov.za/view/DownloadFileAction?id=87398> (accessed 7 May 2010).

67. Foundation for Contemporary Research, 2006a, op. cit.

68. Foundation for Contemporary Research, 2006a, op. cit.

69. Foundation for Contemporary Research, 2006a, op. cit.

70. Foundation for Contemporary Research, 2006a, op. cit.

71. South Africa Human Rights Commission, Reflections on Democracy and Human Rights. A Decade of the South African Constitution (Act 108 of 1996), 2006.

72. Banks S & A Orton, ‘“The grit in the oyster”: Community development workers in a modernising local authority’, Community Development Journal, 42, 1, 2007, pp. 97–113.

73. Gray M & B Mubangizi, ‘Caught in a vortex: Can local government community development workers succeed in South Africa?’, Community Development Journal, 45, 2, 2010, pp. 186–97.

74. Gray M & B Mubangizi, ‘Caught in a vortex: Can local government community development workers succeed in South Africa?’, Community Development Journal, 45, 2, 2010, pp. 186–97.

75. Republic of South Africa, Department of Public Service and Administration, Report on the Implementation and Promotion of Batho Pele, op. cit.