![MathJax Logo](/templates/jsp/_style2/_tandf/pb2/images/math-jax.gif)
Abstract
We construct a mixing homeomorphism on both the Lelek fan and the Cantor fan. We also construct a family of uncountably many pairwise non-homeomorphic smooth (and non-smooth) fans that admit mixing homeomorphisms.
1. Introduction
In this paper we study mixing homeomorphisms on compact metric spaces. By mixing, in this paper, we mean topologically mixing. First, we study how one can use Mahavier products of closed relations on compact metric spaces to construct dynamical systems , where f is a mixing homeomorphism. Next, we study quotients of dynamical systems. We start with a dynamical system
and define an equivalence relation ∼ on X. Then we discuss when the mixing of
implies the mixing of
. Finally, we use these techniques
to obtain a mixing homeomorphism on the Lelek fan,
to obtain a mixing homeomorphism on the Cantor fan, and
to construct a family of uncountably many pairwise non-homeomorphic smooth (non-smooth) fans that admit a mixing homeomorphism.
In addition, we show that
there are continuous functions
on the Lelek fan L such that
h is a homeomorphism and f is not,
and
are both mixing as well as chaotic in the sense of Robinson but not in the sense of Devaney.
there are continuous functions
on the Cantor fan C such that
h is a homeomorphism and f is not,
and
are both mixing as well as chaotic in the sense of Devaney, and
there are continuous functions
on the Cantor fan C such that
h is a homeomorphism and f is not,
and
are both mixing as well as chaotic in the sense of Robinson but not in the sense of Devaney.
Note that the example which is mixing and chaotic in the sense of Knudsen, but not in the sense of Devaney, is not possible since mixing implies transitivity.
We proceed as follows. In Section 2, we introduce the definitions, notation and the well-known results that will be used later in the paper. In Section 3, we study mixing of Mahavier dynamical systems and mixing of quotients of dynamical systems. Then, we use these results in Sections 4– 6 to produce mixing homeomorphisms on various examples of fans.
2. Definitions and notation
The following definitions, notation and well-known results are needed in the paper.
Definition 2.1
Let X be a metric space, and
. We use
to denote the open ball centered at x with radius ε.
Definition 2.2
We use to denote the set of positive integers and
to denote the set of integers.
Definition 2.3
Let be a compact metric space. Then we define
by
Let
and let
. Then we define
by
Let
. The function
, defined by
is called the Hausdorff metric. The Hausdorff metric is in fact a metric and the metric space
is called a hyperspace of the space
.
Remark 2.1
Let be a compact metric space, let A be a non-empty closed subset of X, and let
be a sequence of non-empty closed subsets of X. When we say
, we mean
in
.
Definition 2.4
A continuum is a non-empty compact connected metric space. A subcontinuum is a subspace of a continuum, which is itself a continuum.
Definition 2.5
Let X be a continuum.
The continuum X is unicoherent if for any subcontinua A and B of X such that
, the compactum
is connected.
The continuum X is hereditarily unicoherent provided that each of its subcontinua is unicoherent.
The continuum X is a dendroid if it is an arcwise connected hereditarily unicoherent continuum.
Let X be a continuum. If X is homeomorphic to
, then X is an arc.
A point x in an arc X is called an endpoint of the arc X if there is a homeomorphism
such that
.
Let X be a dendroid. A point
is called an endpoint of the dendroid X if for every arc A in X that contains x, x is an endpoint of A. The set of all endpoints of X will be denoted by
.
A continuum X is a simple triod if it is homeomorphic to
.
A point x in a simple triod X is called the top-point or just the top of the simple triod X if there is a homeomorphism
such that
.
Let X be a dendroid. A point
is called a ramification point of the dendroid X if there is a simple triod T in X with the top x. The set of all ramification points of X will be denoted by
.
The continuum X is a fan if it is a dendroid with at most one ramification point v, which is called the top of the fan X (if it exists).
Let X be a fan. For all points x and y in X, we define
to be the arc in X with endpoints x and y if
. If x=y, then we define
.
Let X be a fan with top v. We say that that the fan X is smooth if for any
and for any sequence
of points in X,
Let X be a fan. We say that X is a Cantor fan if X is homeomorphic to the continuum
where
is the standard Cantor set and for each
,
is the straight line segment in the plane from
to
. See Figure where a Cantor fan is pictured.
Let X be a fan. We say that X is a Lelek fan if it is smooth and
. See Figure where a Lelek fan is pictured.
Observation 2.6
The Cantor fan is universal for smooth fans, i.e. every smooth fan embeds into it (for details see [Citation12, Theorem 9, p. 27], [Citation17, Corollary 4], and [Citation15]).
Also, note that a Lelek fan was constructed by A. Lelek in [Citation19]. An interesting property of the Lelek fan L is that the set of its endpoints is a dense one-dimensional set in L. It is also unique, i.e. any two Lelek fans are homeomorphic, for the proofs see [Citation11,Citation13].
In this paper, X will always be a non-empty compact metric space.
Definition 2.7
Let X be a non-empty compact metric space and let be a continuous function. We say that
is a dynamical system.
Definition 2.8
Let be a dynamical system and let
. The sequence
is called the trajectory of x. The set
is called the forward orbit set of x.
Definition 2.9
Let be a dynamical system and let
. If
, then x is called a transitive point in
. Otherwise it is an intransitive point in
. We use
to denote the set
Definition 2.10
Let be a dynamical system. We say that
is transitive if for all non-empty open sets U and V in X, there is a non-negative integer n such that
. We say that the mapping f is transitive if
is transitive.
The following theorem is a well-known result. See [Citation18] for more information about transitive dynamical systems.
Theorem 2.11
Let be a dynamical system. Then the following hold.
(1) | If | ||||
(2) | If |
Definition 2.12
Let be a dynamical system. We say that
is mixing if for all non-empty open sets U and V in X, there is a non-negative integer
such that for each positive integer n,
We say that the mapping f is mixing if
is mixing.
Definition 2.13
Let and
be dynamical systems. We say that
is topologically conjugate to
if there is a homeomorphism
such that
.
is topologically semi-conjugate to
if there is a continuous surjection
such that
.
Definition 2.14
Let X be a compact metric space. We say that X
admits a transitive homeomorphism if there is a homeomorphism
such that
is transitive.
admits a mixing homeomorphism if there is a homeomorphism
such that
is mixing.
Theorems 2.15 and 2.16 are well-known results. Their proofs may be found in [Citation1,Citation2,Citation18].
Theorem 2.15
Let be a dynamical system such that f is a homeomorphism. Then the following hold.
(1) |
| ||||
(2) |
|
Theorem 2.16
Let and
be dynamical systems.
(1) | If | ||||
(2) | If |
Definition 2.17
Let X be a compact metric space and let be a continuous function. The inverse limit generated by
is the subspace
of the topological product
. The function
, defined by
for each
, is called the shift map on
.
Observation 2.18
Note that the shift map σ on the inverse limit is a homeomorphism. Also, note that for each
,
Theorem 2.19 is a well-known result. Its proof may be found in [Citation2] or in [Citation18].
Theorem 2.19
Let be a mixing dynamical system such that f is surjective and let
be the shift map on
. Then the following hold.
(1) |
| ||||
(2) |
|
Definition 2.20
Let be a dynamical system. We say that
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions if there is an
such that for each
and for each
, there are
and a positive integer n such that
Observation 2.21
Let be a dynamical system. Note that
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions if and only if there is
such that for each non-empty open set U in X, there is a positive integer n such that
. See [Citation8, Theorem 2.29] for more information.
Definition 2.22
Let be a dynamical system and let A be a non-empty closed subset of X. We say that
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions with respect to A if there is
such that for each non-empty open set U in X, there are
and a positive integer n such thatFootnote1
Proposition 2.23
Let be a dynamical system and let A be a non-empty closed subset of X. If
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions with respect to A, then
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions.
Proof.
Suppose that has sensitive dependence on initial conditions with respect to A and let
be such that for each non-empty open set U in X, there are
and a positive integer n such that
To see that
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions, we use Observation 2.21. Let U be any non-empty open set in X and let
and let n be a positive integer such that
Then
and we are done.
We use the following result.
Theorem 2.24
Let be a dynamical system such that f is surjective, let A be a non-empty closed subset of X such that
, and let σ be the shift homeomorphism on
. If f is surjective and
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions with respect to A, then
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions with respect to
.
Proof.
See [Citation8, Theorem 3.14].
We conclude this section by defining three different types of chaos. First, we define periodic points.
Definition 2.25
Let be a dynamical system and
. We say that p is a periodic point in
if there is a positive integer n such that
. We use
to denote the set of periodic points in
.
Definition 2.26
Let be a dynamical system. We say that
is chaotic in the sense of Robinson [Citation20] if
is transitive, and
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions.
Definition 2.27
Let be a dynamical system. We say that
is chaotic in the sense of Knudsen [Citation16] if
is dense in X, and
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions.
Definition 2.28
Let be a dynamical system. We say that
is chaotic in the sense of Devaney [Citation14], if
is transitive, and
is dense in X.
Observation 2.29
Note that it is proved in [Citation10, Theorem] that for any dynamical system ,
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions if
is transitive and if the set
is dense in X.
We also use special kind of projections that are defined in the following definition.
Definition 2.30
For each (positive) integer i and for each (or
or
), we use
or
or
to denote the ith coordinate
of the point
.
We also use and
to denote the standard projections defined by
and
for all
.
3. Mixing, Mahavier dynamical systems and quotients of dynamical systems
We give new results about how Mahavier products of closed relations on compact metric spaces can be used to construct dynamical systems such that f is a mixing homeomorphism. Then we study quotients of dynamical systems. Explicitly, we start with a dynamical system
and an equivalence relation ∼ on X. Then, we discuss when the mixing of
implies the mixing of
.
3.1. Mixing and Mahavier dynamical systems
First, we define Mahavier products of closed relations.
Definition 3.1
Let X be a non-empty compact metric space and let be a non-empty relation on X. If
is closed in
, then we say that
is a closed relation on X.
Definition 3.2
Let X be a non-empty compact metric space and let be a closed relation on X. For each positive integer m, we call
the mth Mahavier product of F; we call
the Mahavier product of
; and
the two-sided Mahavier product of
.
Definition 3.3
Let X be a non-empty compact metric space and let be a closed relation on X. The function
, defined by
for each
, is called the shift map on
. The function
, defined by
for each
, is called the shift map on
.
Observation 3.4
Note that is always a homeomorphism while
may not be a homeomorphism.
Definition 3.5
Let X be a compact metric space and let F be a closed relation on X. The dynamical system
is called a Mahavier dynamical system.
is called a two-sided Mahavier dynamical system.
Observation 3.6
Let X be a compact metric space and let F be a closed relation on X such that . Note that
is semi-conjugate to
: for
, defined by
for any
,
.
Theorems 3.7 and 3.8 are proved in [Citation7] (Theorems 4.1 and 4.4, respectively). We use these theorems to prove Theorems 3.9 and 3.13.
Theorem 3.7
Let X be a compact metric space and let F be a closed relation on X. Then
(1) |
| ||||
(2) | The inverse |
Theorem 3.8
Let X be a compact metric space and let F be a closed relation on X such that . Then the following statements are equivalent.
(1) |
| ||||
(2) |
|
Next, we show that if , then
is mixing if and only if
is mixing.
Theorem 3.9
Let X be a compact metric space and let F be a closed relation on X such that . Then the following statements are equivalent.
(1) |
| ||||
(2) |
|
Proof.
Let σ be the shift map on . First, suppose that
is mixing. It follows from
that
is surjective. By Theorem 2.19,
is also mixing. By Theorem 3.7, σ is topologically conjugate to
, therefore,
is mixing. It follows from Theorem 2.15 that
is mixing.
Next, suppose that is mixing. By Theorem 2.15,
is also mixing and it follows from Theorem 3.7 that
is mixing. Since
is surjective, it follows from Theorem 2.19 that
is mixing.
Definition 3.10
Let X be a compact metric space. We use to denote the diagonal set
We use the following lemma to prove Theorem 3.12, where we prove that for each transitive system if
, then
is mixing.
Lemma 3.11
Let X be a compact metric space, let F be a closed relation on X and let U be a non-empty open set in . Then for each
, there is a positive integer
such that for each
,
Proof.
Let k be a positive integer and let ,
,
, …,
be open sets in X such that
Let
and let
be such that for each positive integer
,
. Then
and since
, it follows that
.
Theorem 3.12
Let X be a compact metric space and let F be a closed relation on X. If
(1) |
| ||||
(2) |
|
then is mixing.
Proof.
Let U and V be non-empty open sets in . Since
is transitive, it follows from Theorem 2.11 that
is dense in
. Therefore,
. Let
. By Lemma 3.11, there is a positive integer
such that for each
,
Choose and fix such a positive integer
. Next, let m be a positive integer such that
and such that
, and let
Then for each positive integer
,
. Therefore,
. Also, note that
, therefore,
. It follows that
.
Next, let
Then for each positive integer
,
. Therefore,
. Also, note that
, therefore,
. It follows that
.
In general, let k be any positive integer and let
Then for each positive integer
,
. Therefore,
. Also, note that
, therefore,
. It follows that
. This proves that for any positive integer n,
therefore,
is mixing.
Theorem 3.13 is a variant of Theorem 3.12 where from Theorem 3.12 is replaced by
.
Theorem 3.13
Let X be a compact metric space and let F be a closed relation on X. If
(1) |
| ||||
(2) |
|
then is mixing.
Proof.
Suppose that is transitive, and that
. Note that
since
. By Theorem 3.8,
is transitive. Since
, it follows from Theorem 3.12 that
is mixing. By Theorem 3.9,
is mixing since
.
In Theorem 3.14, we show that adding the diagonal to the closed relation, preserves the transitivity of the Mahavier dynamical system.
Theorem 3.14
Let X be a compact metric space, let G be a closed relation on X such that and let
. Then the following hold.
(1) | If | ||||
(2) | If |
Proof.
To prove Theorem 3.14(1), suppose that is transitive, let m and n be positive integers, let
,
,
, …,
,
,
,
, …,
be non-empty open sets in X, and let
and
be such that
and
. To see that
is transitive, we prove that there is a non-negative integer ℓ such that
.
First, let be such that
, and let
Next, let
and let
be such that
for each
,
and
.
Also, let
and let
Then, let
be such that
, and let
Next, let
and let
be such that
for each
,
and
.
Also, let
and let
Note that
and
are both open in
such that
and
, and
and
are both open in
such that
and
Next, let ℓ be a positive integer such that and
and let
be such that
. Note that such an integer ℓ does exist by Theorem 2.11. Finally, let
Note that
and that
. Therefore,
and it follows that
is transitive.
To prove Theorem 3.14(2), suppose that is transitive. By Theorem 3.8,
is transitive, therefore, by Theorem 3.14(1), so is
. Finally, it follows from Theorem 3.8 that
is transitive.
Corollary 3.15
Let X be a compact metric space, let G be a closed relation on X such that and let
. Then the following hold.
If
is transitive, then
is mixing.
If
is transitive, then
is mixing.
Proof.
To prove Corollary 3.15(1), suppose that is transitive. By Theorem 3.14,
is transitive. Therefore, by Theorem 3.12,
is mixing since
.
To prove Corollary 3.15(2), suppose that is transitive. By Theorem 3.14,
is transitive. Therefore, by Theorem 3.13,
is mixing since
.
3.2. Mixing and quotients of dynamical systems
Theorem 3.22 is the main result of this section. First, we introduce quotients of dynamical systems and recall some of their properties.
Definition 3.16
Let X be a compact metric space and let ∼ be an equivalence relation on X. For each , we use
to denote the equivalence class of the element x with respect to the relation ∼. We also use
to denote the quotient space
.
Observation 3.17
Let X be a compact metric space, let ∼ be an equivalence relation on X, let be the quotient map that is defined by
for each
, and let
. Then
Definition 3.18
Let X be a compact metric space, let ∼ be an equivalence relation on X, and let be a function such that for all
,
Then we let
be defined by
for any
.
Proposition 3.19
Let X be a compact metric space, let ∼ be an equivalence relation on X, and let be a function such that for all
,
Then the following hold.
(1) |
| ||||
(2) | If f is continuous, then | ||||
(3) | If f is a homeomorphism, then | ||||
(4) | If |
Proof.
See [Citation7, Theorem 3.4].
Definition 3.20
Let be a dynamical system and let ∼ be an equivalence relation on X such that for all
,
Then we say that
is a quotient of the dynamical system
or it is the quotient of the dynamical system
that is obtained from the relation ∼.
Observation 3.21
Let be a dynamical system. Note that we have defined a dynamical system as a pair consisting of a compact metric space and a continuous function and that in this case,
is not necessarily metrizable. So, if
is metrizable, then also
is a dynamical system. Note that for the quotient map
,
. Therefore,
is semi-conjugate to
.
Theorem 3.22
Let X be a compact metric space, let ∼ be an equivalence relation on X, and let be a function such that for all
,
If
is mixing and
is metrizable, then
is mixing.
Proof.
Suppose that is mixing and that
is metrizable. It follows from Theorem 2.16 and Observations 3.21 that
is mixing.
4. Mixing on the Lelek fan
In this section, we produce on the Lelek fan a mixing homeomorphism as well as a mixing mapping, which is not a homeomorphism.
Definition 4.1
In this section, we use X to denote . For each
, we define the sets
,
and
as follows:
,
, and
. We also define the set
by
.
Definition 4.2
Let . We say that r and ρ never connect or
if
r<1,
and
for all integers k and ℓ,
In [Citation5], the following theorem is the main result.
Theorem 4.3
Let . Then
is a Lelek fan with top
.
Proof.
See [Citation5, Theorem 14].
Definition 4.4
Let . We use
to denote the following closed relation on X:
see Figure .
Theorem 4.5
Let . Then
and
are both Lelek fans.
Proof.
It follows from the proof of [Citation4, Theorem 3.1] that is a Lelek fan. To see that
is a Lelek fan, let
and
for each
and each
. Note that for each
and each
,
is a straight line segment in the Hilbert cube
from
to
, and that for all
and all
,
Since
is a Cantor set, it follows that
is a Cantor fan. Therefore,
is a subcontinuum of the Cantor fan C. Note that for each
and each
,
is either degenerate or it is an arc from
to some other point, denote it by
. Let
Then
Next, we show that for each
,
Let
. We treat the following possible cases.
Case 1. | For each integer k, there are integers | ||||
Case 2. | There is an integer | ||||
Case 3. | There is an integer | ||||
Case 4. | There are integers |
We have just proved that
To see that
is a Lelek fan, let
be any point and let
. We prove that there is a point
such that
. Without loss of generality, we assume that
. Let
be a positive integer such that
. It follows from [Citation5, Theorem 9] that there is a sequence
such that
Choose and fix such a sequence
. Let
Then
since
and
where D is the metric on
. This proves that also
is a Lelek fan.
Theorem 4.6
Let . The dynamical systems
and
are both mixing.
Proof.
It follows from [Citation3, Theorem 4.3 and Observation 5.3] that and
are transitive. Since
, it follows from Corollary 3.15 that
and
are both mixing.
Theorem 4.7
The following hold for the Lelek fan L.
(1) | There is a continuous mapping f on the Lelek fan L, which is not a homeomorphism, such that | ||||
(2) | There is a homeomorphism h on the Lelek fan L such that |
Proof.
Let . We prove each part of the theorem separately.
Let
and let
. Note that f is a continuous function which is not a homeomorphism. By Theorem 4.6,
is mixing.
Let
and let
. Note that h is a homeomorphism. By Theorem 4.6,
is mixing.
5. Mixing on the Cantor fan
In this section, we produce on the Cantor fan a mixing homeomorphism as well as a mixing mapping, which is not a homeomorphism. Furthermore, we produce
continuous functions
on the Cantor fan C such that
h is a homeomorphism and f is not,
and
are both mixing as well as chaotic in the sense of Devaney, and
continuous functions
on the Cantor fan C such that
h is a homeomorphism and f is not,
and
are both mixing as well as chaotic in the sense of Robinson but not in the sense of Devaney
Note that for every dynamical system , it holds that if
is mixing, then
is transitive. Therefore, there are no continuous functions, and hence no homeomorphisms,
on the Cantor fan C such that
is mixing and chaotic in the sense of Knudsen but not chaotic in the sense of Devaney.
We use the following theorems to prove results about periodic points.
Theorem 5.1
Let be a dynamical system, let A be a nowhere dense closed subset of X such that
and
, and let ∼ be the equivalence relation on X, defined by
for all
. Then the following statements are equivalent.
(1) | The set | ||||
(2) | The set |
Proof.
See [Citation8, Theorem 3.16].
Theorem 5.2
Let X be a compact metric space and let F be a closed relation on X. If for each , there are a positive integer n and a point
such that
and
, then the set of periodic points
is dense in
.
Proof.
See [Citation8, Theorem 2.21].
Theorem 5.3
Let be a dynamical system and let σ be the shift homeomorphism on
. The following statements are equivalent.
(1) | The set | ||||
(2) | The set |
Proof.
[Citation8, Theorem 2.22].
We use Theorem 5.5 to prove results about transitive dynamical systems on the Cantor fan.
Definition 5.4
Let X be a compact metric space, let F be a closed relation on X and let . Then we define
and we call it the forward impression of x by F.
Theorem 5.5
Let X be a compact metric space, let F be a closed relation on X and let and
be non-empty collections of continuous functions from X to X such that
If there is a dense set D in X such that for each
,
, then
is transitive.
Proof.
See [Citation7, Theorem 4.8].
Finally, we use the following theorem when studying sensitive dependence on initial conditions.
Theorem 5.6
Let be a dynamical system, let A be a nowhere dense closed subset of X such that
and
, and let ∼ be the equivalence relation on X, defined by
for all
. The following statements are equivalent.
(1) |
| ||||
(2) |
|
Proof.
See [Citation8, Theorem 3.15].
5.1. Mixing and Devaney's chaos on the Cantor fan
Here, we study functions f on the Cantor fan C such that is mixing as we well as chaotic in the sense of Devaney.
Definition 5.7
In this subsection, we use X to denote , and we let
to be the homeomorphisms from X to X that are defined by
,
for each
. Then we use F to denote the relation
; see Figure .
Definition 5.8
We define two equivalence relations.
For all
, we define the relation
as follows:
For all
, we define the relation ∼ as follows:
Observation 5.9
Essentially the same proof as the one from [Citation7, Example 4.14] shows that the quotient spaces and
are both Cantor fans. Also, note that
is not a homeomorphism on
while
is a homeomorphism on
.
Theorem 5.10
The following hold for the sets of periodic points in and
.
(1) | The set | ||||
(2) | The set |
Proof.
Using Theorem 5.1, we prove each of the statements separately.
We use Theorem 5.2 to prove the first part of the theorem. Let
be any point. We show that there are a positive integer n and a point
such that
and
. We consider the following cases for x.
. If y=x, then let n=1 and
. If y=x+2, then let n=3 and
.
. If
, then let n=3 and
. If y=x, then let n=1 and
. If y=x+2, then let n=3 and
.
. If
, then let n=3 and
. If y=x, then let n=1 and
. If y=x+2, then let n=3 and
.
. If
, then let n=3 and
. If y=x, then let n=1 and
. If y=x+2, then let n=3 and
.
. If
, then let n=3 and
. If y=x, then let n=1 and
.
It follows from Theorem 5.10(1) and from Theorem 5.3 that the set
of periodic points in
is dense in
. By Theorem 3.7, the set
of periodic points in the quotient
is dense in
.
Theorem 5.11
The dynamical systems and
are both transitive.
Proof.
To prove that is transitive, we prove that
is transitive. Note that both F and
are unions of three graphs of homeomorphisms. Hence, all the initial conditions from Theorem 5.5 are satisfied. To see that
is transitive, we prove that there is a dense set D in X such that for each
,
. Let
. Then D is dense in X. Let
be any point. We consider the following cases for s.
. Then
.
. Then
.
. Then
.
. Then
.
Depending on the case, denote or
with t. Then
It follows from the definition of F that for all integers m, n and for each
,
It follows from Theorem [Citation7, Lemma 4.9] that
is dense in X. Since
it follows that
is dense in X. Therefore, by Theorem 5.5,
is transitive and it follows from Theorem 3.8 that
is transitive since
. It follows from Theorem 3.19 that
and
are both transitive.
Theorem 5.12
The dynamical systems and
both have sensitive dependence on initial conditions.
Proof.
The dynamical systems and
are both transitive by Theorem 5.11. Also, by Theorem 5.10, the set
of periodic points in the quotient
is dense in
, and the set
of periodic points in the quotient
is dense in
. It follows from [Citation10, Theorem] that
and
both have sensitive dependence on initial conditions.
Theorem 5.13
The following hold for the Cantor fan C.
(1) | There is a continuous mapping f on the Cantor fan C, which is not a homeomorphism, such that | ||||
(2) | There is a homeomorphism h on the Cantor fan C such that |
Proof.
We prove each part of the theorem separately.
Let
and let
. Note that f is a continuous function which is not a homeomorphism. By Theorem 5.12,
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions, by Theorem 5.11,
is transitive, and by Theorem 5.10, the set
of periodic points in
is dense in C. Therefore,
is chaotic in the sense of Devaney.
It follows from Theorem 3.12 that
is mixing since
. It follows from Theorem 3.22 that
is also mixing.
Let
and let
. Note that h is a homeomorphism. By Theorem 5.12,
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions, by Theorem 5.11,
is transitive, and by Theorem 5.10, the set
of periodic points in
is dense in C. Therefore,
is chaotic in the sense of Devaney.
It follows from Theorem 3.13 that
is mixing since
. It follows from Theorem 3.22 that
is also mixing.
5.2. Mixing and Robinson's chaos but not Devaney's chaos on the Cantor fan
Here, we study functions f on the Cantor fan C such that is mixing as we well as chaotic in the sense of Robinson but not in the sense of Devaney.
Definition 5.14
In this subsection, we use X to denote
and we let
to be the homeomorphisms from X to X that are defined by
,
for each
. Then we use F to denote the relation
; see Figure .
Definition 5.15
We define two equivalence relations.
For all
, we define the relation
as follows:
For all
, we define the relation ∼ as follows:
Observation 5.16
Note that it follows from [Citation7, Example 4.14] that the quotient spaces and
are both Cantor fans. Also, note that
is not a homeomorphism on
while
is a homeomorphism on
.
First, we prove the following theorems about sensitive dependence on initial conditions.
Theorem 5.17
Let . Then
(1) |
| ||||
(2) |
|
Proof.
First, note that and
. Next, let
and let
. We show that for each basic open set U of the product topology on
such that
, there are
such that for some positive integer m,
where d is the product metric on
, defined by
for all
. Let U be a basic set of the product topology on
such that
. Also, let n be a positive integer and for each
, let
be an open set in X such that
Next, let
be any point such that
. We consider the following possible cases for the coordinate
of the point
.
. Then let
be defined by
and for each positive integer k,
. Also, we define
as follows. First, let
Next, we define
Note that
Let
be an even positive integer such that for each positive integer k,
Let
. Then,
and
. Then there is an integer
such that
. In this case, the proof is analogous to the proof of the previous case. We leave the details to the reader.
This proves that has sensitive dependence on initial conditions with respect to A.
Corollary 5.18
Let . Then
(1) |
| ||||
(2) |
|
Proof.
First, note that and
. Next, let
By Theorem 5.17,
and
, and
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions with respect to A.
Note that is surjective. By Theorem 2.24,
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions with respect to
, where σ is the shift homeomorphism on
. By Theorem 3.7, the inverse limit
is homeomorphic to the two-sided Mahavier product
and the inverse of the shift homeomorphism
on
is topologically conjugate to the shift homeomorphism σ on
. Let
be the homeomorphism, used to prove Theorem 3.7 in [Citation7, Theorem 4.1]. Then
. Therefore,
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions with respect to B.
Theorem 5.19
The dynamical systems and
both have sensitive dependence on initial conditions.
Proof.
For each of the dynamical systems, we prove separately that it has sensitive dependence on initial conditions.
Let
and let
, i.e. for each
,
. We show that
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions. Let
By Theorem 5.17,
and
and
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions with respect to A.
Since A is a closed nowhere dense set in
, it follows from Theorem 5.6 that
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions.
Let
and let
, i.e. for each
,
. We show that
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions. The rest of the proof is analogous to the proof above – instead of the set A, the set
is used in the proof. We leave the details to a reader.
Theorem 5.20
The following hold for the sets of periodic points in and in
.
(1) | The set | ||||
(2) | The set |
Proof.
We prove each of the statements separately.
Let
. Then U is open in
and
. However, note that
. This is true since for each
, for each
such that
, and for each positive integer n>1,
and such an
is not equal to x. It follows that the set
of periodic points in
is not dense in
. Therefore, by Theorem 5.1, the set
of periodic points in
is not dense in
.
Suppose that the set
of periodic points in the quotient
is dense in
. Therefore, by Theorem 5.1, the set
of periodic points in
is dense in
. It follows from Theorem 3.7, the set
of periodic points in
is dense in
. By Theorem 5.3, the set
of periodic points in
is dense in
, which contradicts with Theorem 5.20(1).
Theorem 5.21
The dynamical systems and
are both transitive.
Proof.
The proof of this theorem is analogous to the proof of Theorem 5.11. We leave the details to a reader.
Theorem 5.22
The following hold for the Cantor fan C.
(1) | There is a continuous mapping f on the Cantor fan C, which is not a homeomorphism, such that | ||||
(2) | There is a homeomorphism h on the Cantor fan C such that |
Proof.
We prove each part of the theorem separately.
Let
and let
. Note that f is a continuous function which is not a homeomorphism. By Theorem 5.19,
has sensitive dependence on initial conditions. By Theorem 5.21,
is transitive. It follows from Theorem 5.20 that the set
of periodic points in the quotient
is not dense in C. Therefore,
is chaotic in the sense of Robinson but it is not chaotic in the sense of Devaney.
It follows from Theorem 3.12 that
is mixing since
. It follows from Theorem 3.22 that
is also mixing.
Let
and let
. Note that h is a homeomorphism. The rest of the proof is analogous to the proof above. We leave the details to a reader.
6. Uncountable family of (non-)smooth fans that admit mixing homeomorphisms
In this section, an uncountable family of pairwise non-homeomorphic smooth fans that admit mixing homeomorphisms is constructed. Our construction of the family
follows the idea from [Citation6], where an uncountable family
of pairwise non-homeomorphic smooth fans that admit transitive homeomorphisms is constructed: every step of the construction of family
from [Citation6] is essentially copied here to construct the family
. The only difference is a small modification of the relation H on X that is used in [Citation6, Definition 4.13] to obtain the family
: in H, the graph in
is replaced with the graph in
and the graph in
is replaced with the graph in
; see [Citation6, Figure 5] and Figure . Therefore, in this section, we omit the details and simply state our first theorem.
Theorem 6.1
There is a family of uncountable many pairwise non-homeomorphic smooth fans that admit mixing homeomorphisms.
In [Citation9], a family of uncountably many pairwise non-homeomorphic non-smooth fans that admit transitive homeomorphisms is constructed from the family from [Citation6]. This is done in such a way that for each smooth fan
, a special equivalence relation ∼ on F is defined in such a way that
is a non-smooth fan that admits a transitive homeomorphism. The same procedure as the one from [Citation9] for the family
, works also for our family
. It transforms every smooth fan
to a non-smooth fan
that admits a mixing homeomorphism. The following theorem is, therefore, a good place to finish the paper. Since its proof is essentially the same as the proof of [Citation9, Theorem 3.23], we leave the details to a reader.
Theorem 6.2
There is a family of uncountable many pairwise non-homeomorphic non-smooth fans that admit mixing homeomorphisms.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the anonymous referees for their careful reading. The suggestions of the referees have helped to improve the paper.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Funding
Notes
1 For each ,
.
References
- E. Akin, General Topology of Dynamical Systems, Graduate Studies in Mathematics Series Vol. 1, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1993.
- N. Aoki, Topological dynamics, in Topics in General Topology, K. Morita and J. Nagata, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989, pp. 625–740.
- I. Banič, G. Erceg, and J. Kennedy, A transitive homeomorphism on the Lelek fan, J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 23 (2023), pp. 393–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236198.2023.2208242.
- I. Banič, G. Erceg, and J. Kennedy, An embedding of the Cantor fan into the Lelek fan (2024). Available at https://web.math.pmf.unizg.hr/duje/∼radhazumz/preprints/banic-erceg-kennedy-preprint.pdf
- I. Banič, G. Erceg, and J. Kennedy, The Lelek fan as the inverse limit of intervals with a single set-valued bonding function whose graph is an arc, Mediterr. J. Math. 20 (2023), pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-023-02323-3.
- I. Banič, G. Erceg, J. Kennedy, C. Mouron, and V. Nall, An uncountable family of smooth fans that admit transitive homeomorphisms (2023). Available at https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.04003.
- I. Banič, G. Erceg, J. Kennedy, C. Mouron, and V. Nall, Transitive mappings on the Cantor fan (2023). Available at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.03350.
- I. Banič, G. Erceg, J. Kennedy, and V. Nall, Quotients of dynamical systems and chaos on the Cantor fan (2023). Available at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.19129.
- I. Banič, J. Kennedy, C. Mouron, and V. Nall, An uncountable family of non-smooth fans that admit transitive homeomorphisms (2023). Available at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.08711.
- J. Banks, J. Brooks, G. Cairns, G. Davis, and P. Stacey, On Devaney's definition of chaos, Am. Math. Mon. 99 (1992), pp. 332–334.
- W.D. Bula and L. Oversteegen, A characterization of smooth Cantor Bouquets, Proc. Am. Math. Soc.108 (1990), pp. 529–534.
- J.J. Charatonik, On fans, Diss. Math. 54 (1967), pp. 1–40.
- W.J. Charatonik, The Lelek fan is unique, Houston J. Math. 15 (1989), pp. 27–34.
- R.L. Devaney, A First Course in Chaotic Dynamical Systems: Theory and Experiments, Perseus Books, Reading, MA, 1992.
- C. Eberhart, A note on smooth fans, Colloq. Math. 20 (1969), pp. 89–90.
- C. Knudsen, Chaos without nonperiodicity, Am. Math. Mon.101 (1994), pp. 563–565.
- R.J. Koch, Arcs in partially ordered spaces, Pacific J. Math. 20 (1959), pp. 723–728.
- S. Kolyada and L. Snoha, Topological transitivity, Scholarpedia 4(2) (2009), pp. 5802.
- A. Lelek, On plane dendroids and their endpoints in the classical sense, Fund. Math. 49 (1960/1961), pp. 301–319.
- C. Robinson, Dynamical Systems: Stability, Symbolic Dynamics, and Chaos, 2nd ed., CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 1999.