Reasons why dynamic compression plates are inferior to locking plates in osteoporotic bone: a finite element explanation

Abstract

While locking plate fixation is becoming increasingly popular for complex and osteoporotic fractures, for many indications compression plating remains the standard choice. This study compares the mechanical behaviour of the more recent locking compression plate (LCP) device, with the traditional dynamic compression plates (DCPs) in bone of varying quality using finite element modelling. The bone properties considered include orthotropy, inhomogeneity, cortical thinning and periosteal apposition associated with osteoporosis. The effect of preloads induced by compression plating was included in the models. Two different fracture scenarios were modelled: one with complete reduction and one with a fracture gap. The results show that the preload arising in DCPs results in large principal strains in the bone all around the perimeter of the screw hole, whereas for LCPs large principal strains occur primarily on the side of the screw proximal to the load. The strains within the bone produced by the two screw types are similar in healthy bone with a reduced fracture gap; however, the DCP produces much larger strains in osteoporotic bone. In the presence of a fracture gap, the DCP results in a considerably larger region with high tensile strains and a slightly smaller region with high compressive strains. These findings provide a biomechanical basis for the reported improved performance of locking plates in poorer bone quality.

Keywords::

• screw
• locking compression plate
• dynamic compression plate
• principal strains
• preload

Conflict of interest disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

^1. Email: [email protected]

^2. Email: [email protected]

Additional information

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Orthopaedic Research UK [grant number RP 10-48].