276
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Polyethylene glenoid component fixation geometry influences stability in total shoulder arthroplasty

, , &
Pages 271-279 | Received 10 Nov 2017, Accepted 19 Nov 2018, Published online: 31 Dec 2018
 

Abstract

Glenoid component stability is essential to ensure successful long-term survivability following total shoulder arthroplasty. As such, this computational study assessed the stability of five all-polyethylene glenoid components (Keel, Central-Finned 4-Peg, Peripheral 4-Peg, Cross-Keel, and Inverted-Y), using simulated joint loading in an osteoarthritic patient cohort. Stability was assessed on the basis of component micromotion in the tangential and normal directions. Maximum tangential micromotion occurred in the Cross-Keel (146 ± 46 µm), which was significantly greater (p < .001) than the other components. Maximum normal micromotion occurred in the Inverted-Y (109 ± 43 µm), which was significantly greater (p ≤ .002) than the other four components. In general, the Central-Finned 4-Peg exhibited the least normal and tangential micromotion, while the keeled components shown the highest normal and tangential micromotion. This study suggests that modifications to keeled designs do not improve component stability under the conditions tested, and pegged components show superior computational stability.

Acknowledgements

Nikolas K. Knowles is supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and by a Transdisciplinary Bone & Joint Training Award from the Collaborative Training Program in Musculoskeletal Health Research at The University of Western Ontario.

Disclosure statement

The authors (NKK, GDGL & LMF), their immediate families, and any research foundations with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article. Institutional Review Board Approval (IRB) was obtained from the Western University Health Science Research Ethics Board (Approval #105912). The author (GSA) is a consultant for Wright/Tornier Inc, Imascap, and Depuy Synthes. Additionally, he has received research support from Tornier Inc, Depuy Synthes and Exactech for research related to the subject of this article. No company had any input in to the study design, protocol, testing, data analysis or manuscript preparation.

Additional information

Funding

Funding was provided in part by a Lawson Research Internal Research Fund Award.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.