202
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Predictions of Birmingham hip resurfacing implant offset - In vitro and numerical models

, &
Pages 352-363 | Received 18 Jan 2018, Accepted 22 Nov 2018, Published online: 04 Feb 2019
 

Abstract

The number of hip resurfacing arthroplasty procedures has declined dramatically in recent years, for reasons related to the survival rate. Some studies suggest that metal particles are the main critical problem, but do not specify the effect of femoral position on the failure rate. The present study aims to analyze whether the positioning of the resurfacing head implant is important in the distribution of bone strains and in the risk of fracture of the femur.

Three in vitro experimental models received the Birmingham hip resurfacing implant to replicate the total hip joint. The resurfacing head of the implanted models was placed in three different offset positions: in a positive offset, with the same femoral head center and in a negative offset.

The numerical models were validated by correlating numerical and experimental results. Comparing experimental results from the implanted and intact femurs highlights a strain increase of up to 48% in the proximal medial femur region for positive offset and up to 18% in the neutral position. A reduction of 72% for negative offset (valgus position) was also measured experimentally.

A significant change in strain distributions was observed with a resurfacing hip system and increased risk of neck fracture was found using the resurfacing head in positive offset. The iliac bone presents a high decrease in strains that will induce bone loss in the long term. Among the offset positions tested, results suggest that the negative offset (valgus position) and the natural position are the best equilibrated for better long-term results.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge FCT support from the research unit UID/SEM/00481/2013 and project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-032486.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence the work.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.