Abstract
This paper outlines the concepts of sustainability and sustainable development, and considers the evolution of efforts to integrate culture into sustainable development policy and practice over recent years. The specific concept of culturally sustainable development (CSD), first promulgated more than 20 years ago, is re-assessed in the light of contemporary circumstances as a theoretically plausible proposition and as a basis for application to cultural policy formation. The paper proposes a set of principles by which consistency of a cultural policy or cultural development strategy with CSD can be judged. The application of each of the principles is discussed, drawing illustrations from particular policy areas in both developed and developing countries. The paper argues that CSD is a concept that has both theoretical substance and potential for practical policy application.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful for comments from two anonymous referees which enabled many improvements to this paper. Views expressed are entirely my own.
Notes
1. See in particular Isar’s paper in this volume.
2. This section and the next draw some material from several of the author’s earlier writings, including Throsby (Citation2010, Ch 12, Citation2012a).
4. Illustrations include applications to fisheries (Fletcher et al. Citation2005) and water quality (Harding Citation2006); the latter paper also contains a succinct account of ESD policy development in Australia.
5. The reports emanating from this process comprise a comprehensive collection of industry analyses and discussion of inter-sectoral issues in the application of ESD in Australian policy in the early 1990s – see ESD Working Group Chairs (Citation1992); see also Emmery (Citation1993); Productivity Commission (Citation1999).
6. The industries considered in the Australian process were agriculture, fisheries, forestry, mining, manufacturing, energy production, energy use, transport and tourism. Note that this process pre-dated the emergence of the creative economy, so cultural or creative industries were not included.
8. Similarly the chapter discussing ‘Culture and Sustainability’ in the 1998 World Culture Report deals with cultural knowledge as a guide to environmental management and related issues; see Leach (Citation1998).
10. For a thorough treatment of cultural capital, including a discussion of ‘weak’ and ‘strong’ sustainability, see Rizzo and Throsby (Citation2006); see also Dalziel et al. (Citation2009).
11. The latter are sometimes referred to as ‘cultural ecosystems’ in imitation of the parallel concept in ecology.
12. Members of such organisations do of course also enjoy a private benefit from their membership; it is not known what proportions of an organisation’s membership revenues derive from public-good and/or private-good demand.
14. An economic analysis of the relationship between trade in movies and cultural diversity can be found in Shin (Citation2015).
15. To implement such a proposal requires a valid means for assessment of cultural value; heritage evaluation is one area where some progress has been made in this direction, thanks to the fact that indicators of cultural significance are called for in the processing of listing decisions. On measurement aspects, see Throsby (Citation2013).
16. See UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (Citation2013).
17. For examples of culture as a component of city development, see UNESCO (Citation2013a) and Dessein et al. (Citation2015).
18. See UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda (Citation2012).
20. See, for example, Resolution 66/208 ‘Culture and Development’ adopted by the General Assembly of the UN on 22 December 2011.
23. See, for example, contributions to De Beukelaer, Pyykkönen, and Singh (Citation2015).
24. For a wide range of examples, see UNESCO’s Global Monitoring Report (UNESCO Citation2015); for an account relating specifically to culture and sustainable development, see this Report’s Ch. 8, 151–169.
26. See, for example, Okpara and Idowu (Citation2013); for a review of CSR in the context of developing economies, see Eweje (Citation2014).
Throsby, D. 2010. The Economics of Cultural Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511845253 Throsby, D. 2012a. “Article 13: Integration of Culture in Sustainable Development.” In The UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions: Explanatory Notes, edited by S. von Schorlemer and P-T. Stoll, 361–370. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-25995-1 Caldwell, L. K. 1984. “Political Aspects of Ecologically Sustainable Development.” Environmental Conservation 11 (4): 299–308.10.1017/S037689290001465X Smith, S. L. 1995. “Ecologically Sustainable Development: Integrating Economics, Ecology, and Law.” Williamette Law Review 31 (2): 261–306. Drexhage, J., and D. Murphy. 2010. Sustainable Development: From Brundtland to Rio 2012 (Background Paper prepared for consideration by the High Level Panel on Global Sustainability). New York: United Nations. Fletcher, W. J., J. Chesson, K. J. Sainsbury, T. J. Hundloe, and M. Fisher. 2005. “A Flexible and Practical Framework for Reporting on Ecologically Sustainable Development for Wild Capture Fisheries.” Fisheries Research 71 (2): 175–183.10.1016/j.fishres.2004.08.030 Harding, R. 2006. “Ecologically Sustainable Development: Origins, Implementation and Challenges.” Desalination 187 (1–3): 229–239.10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.082 Ecologically Sustainable Development Working Group Chairs. 1992. Intersectoral Issues Report. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. Emmery, M. 1993. An Overview of Ecologically Sustainable Development Processes in Australia 1990–1992. Canberra: Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. Productivity Commission. 1999. Implementation of Ecologically Sustainable Development by Commonwealth Departments and Agencies. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia Productivity Commission. Environment Canada. 2010. Planning for a Sustainable Future: A Federal Sustainable Development Strategy for Canada. Gatineau: Sustainable Development Office, Environment Canada. Leach M. A. 1998. “Culture and Sustainability.” In UNESCO, World Culture Report 1998: Culture, Creativity and Markets, 93–104. Paris: UNESCO. Throsby, D. 1995. “Culture, Economics and Sustainability.” Journal of Cultural Economics 19 (3): 199–206.10.1007/BF01074049 Throsby, D. 1997. “Sustainability and Culture Some Theoretical Issues.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 4 (1): 7–19.10.1080/10286639709358060 Throsby, D. 1999. “Cultural Capital.” Journal of Cultural Economics 23 (1/2): 3–12.10.1023/A:1007543313370 Rizzo, I., and D. Throsby. 2006. “Cultural Heritage: Economic Analysis and Public Policy.” In Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture Vol 1, edited by V. A. Ginsburgh and D. Throsby, 984–1016. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland. Dalziel, P., and C. Saunders with R. Fyfe, and B. Newton. 2009. Sustainable Development and Cultural Capital. Official Statistics Research Series, 5, November. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand. Towse, R., ed. 1997. Cultural Economics: The Arts, the Heritage and the Media Industries, 2 Vols. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Frey, B. 2011. “Public Support.” In Handbook of Cultural Economics. 2nd ed, edited by R. Towse, 370–377. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Shin, Yousun. 2015. “Cultural Diversity and International Trade in Cultural Products.” Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Economics, Macquarie University, Sydney. Throsby, D. 2013. “Assessment of Value in Heritage Regulation.” In Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage, edited by I. Rizzo and A. Mignosa, 456–469. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9780857931009 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2013. “Towards Sustainable Cities.” In World Economic and Social Survey 2013: Sustainable Development Challenges, Chap. III. New York: United Nations. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). 2013a. Widening Local Development Pathways: Creative Economy Report 2013. Paris: UNESCO. Dessein, J., K. Soini, G. Fairclough, and L. Horlings, eds. 2015. Culture in, for and as Sustainable Development: Conclusions from the COST Action IS1007: Investigating Cultural Sustainability. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University Press. United Nations System Task Team for the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda. 2012. Realizing the Future We Want for All: Report to the Secretary-General. New York: United Nations. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). 2013b. The Hangzhou Declaration: Placing Culture at the Heart of Sustainable Development Policies. Paris: UNESCO. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). 2014. Florence Declaration. Third UNESCO World Forum on Culture and Cultural Industries: Culture, Creativity and Sustainable Development – Research, Innovation, Opportunities. Paris: UNESCO. Sen, A. 1998. “Culture, Freedom and Independence.” In UNESCO, World Culture Report 1998: Culture, Creativity and Markets, 317–321. Paris: UNESCO. Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press. De Beukelaer, C., M. Pyykkönen, and J. P. Singh, eds. 2015. Globalization, Culture and Development: The UNESCO Convention on Cultural Diversity. London: Palgrave Macmillan. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). 2015. Reshaping Cultural Policies; a Decade Promoting the Diversity of Cultural Expressions for Development. Paris: UNESCO. Okpara, J. O., and S. O. Idowu, eds. 2013. Corporate Social Responsibility: Challenges, Opportunities and Strategies for 21st Century Leaders. Berlin: Springer. Eweje, G. 2014. Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: Emerging Trends in Developing Economies. Bradford: Emerald Group.10.1108/crgs