Abstract
This paper presents a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of roads noise measures in Norway. Low-noise pavement alternatives were compared to stone mastic asphalt with a maximum aggregate size of 11 mm. The low-noise alternatives were expected to reduce the noise levels by 1–4.5 dB over their lifetime, compared to the reference, but had shorter lifetime and, mostly, higher investment cost. A new element included into our CBA of low-noise asphalts is their property in terms of asphalt-wearing and dust production. Given a relationship between asphalt-wearing and airborne particulate matter, there is a potential health impact of pavement choice. Official valuations of both noise changes and PM10 changes were applied for the benefit estimations. Thin-layer asphalts obtained higher benefit-cost ratios than porous asphalts, mainly due to small changes in unit costs and technical lifetime compared to the reference. Alterations in dust production had considerable weight in the benefits, but did not considerably alter the ranking of asphalts compared to analyses not taking dust into account.
Notes
1. Road noise control can be regarded as a local public good. Noise reduction measures can be portioned out to certain localities (e.g. giving a preference to measures in areas with the wealthier segment of the population), but all those living (or working or performing leisure activities) in these areas cannot be denied the benefit of a less noisy environment – the noise reduction is a non-exclusive good to all those within the locality. The noise reduction will also be non-rival in the sense that any person's ‘consumption’ of the reduced noise will not reduce other persons’ ‘consumption’ of the same good within the locality (Hanley et al.
Citation1997).
2. Elvik and Greibe (Citation2005) concluded, from a meta-analysis of 18 studies, that there were no statistically significant effects on road safety (and thus, crash costs) of changing to noise-reducing pavements (porous asphalts). Furthermore, regarding vehicle operation costs, Bendtsen (Citation2004) did not find evidence for differences in rolling resistance and fuel consumption between standard dense asphalts and porous asphalts. Also, additional external (environmental) effects are probably limited and/or going in both directions. Berbee et al. (Citation1999) and Pagotto et al. (Citation2000) argue that noise-reducing porous asphalt has an adsorption property allowing a more gradual run-off of water (limited peak flows and slower discharge) and a filtering effect. This could yield an additional benefit that our analysis omits. Yet, the same porous asphalts may be recycled to a slightly lesser degree than dense asphalt types (Litzka et al.
Citation1999, Pucher et al.
Citation2004); and the gradual run-off may also imply more pollutants in the worn asphalts, although Descornet et al. (Citation1998) found that the quantities of pollutants in worn porous asphalt were generally relatively low.
4. The average double-layer porous asphalt (DPAC 11/16) represents different pavement types in terms of aggregate size and void content in surface layers, but all with similar stone quality. The ‘best possible’ version (DPAC 11/16x) has a larger share of aggregate larger than 4 mm and slightly higher void content than the other pavement types (Lerfald Citation2008, Evensen Citation2009).
3. Porous asphalt has a high stone content and a grading that provides a high void content (>20%) – a feature that increases sound absorption. Double-layer porous asphalt consists of two layers of porous asphalt: a coarse open-graded bottom layer and a finer textured top layer. Thin-layer asphalts are very thin and relatively open layers (∼14%) that are laid on a thick layer of polymer-modified bitumen emulsion (Morgan Citation2006).
5. Compared to other measures to control road noise, the great advantage of noise-reducing pavements is the reduction of the (tyre/road) noise at the source (Sandberg Citation2001). The potential reduction of noise levels will depend on speed levels, average annual daily traffic (ADT) and this traffic's composition of light (and medium) and heavy vehicles (Morgan Citation2006, Ch 11). The tyre/road noise (vs. propulsion noise) will be more dominant at higher speeds. Still, a pavement producing less tyre/road noise may yield a noticeable effect on total vehicle noise at speed levels as low as 40 km/h for light vehicles. Expected noise reduction from low-noise pavements, at different speeds, is assessed either at test sites or at roadside, and the reference pavement is some standard dense asphalt type (Morgan Citation2006, Ch 4, Table 4.2). The CBA should principally also compare the profitability of noise-reducing asphalt to other possible noise-reducing measures, e.g. noise barriers or facade insulation.
6. Test values from the Nordic ball mill test (NB) enter the estimation of a pavement wearing parameter: wearing parameter = (NB / aggregate size) × 100. The Nordic ball mill test is a wet abrasion test that determines resistance to wear by abrasion from studded tyres (CEN Citation1998). The test has shown high correlation with studded tyre wear, applying different pavement stone materials (Snilsberg Citation2008). An alternative test considered was the Tröger test, where measures of the resistance to studded tyres are based on asphalt dust formed from hammering asphalt cores by steel threads, yielding a Tröger value (D
k
) defined as: where Δm is the total particulate matter produced (lost) over a given period, and ρ
d
is the density (Raitanen Citation2005, Lerfald Citation2008). Notwithstanding the test then type, yielding estimates of dust from different pavements, it should be remarked that there is not necessarily very high correlation between the amount of (airborne) dust and the amount of PM10 (Snilsberg Citation2008) and it is the latter that enters the cost-benefit analysis.
7. The Norwegian Institute of Public Health has applied the following equation for estimating the change in health effects for a given area: PM = D
0 × ΔRR × ΔE
x/10 μg/m3, where PM is the number of incidents caused by PM10 increase, D0 is the number of incidents, per year in the given area, ΔRR is the increase in relative risk, and ΔE
x is the increase (μg/m3) in PM10 (NIPH Citation2005, Snilsberg Citation2008).
8. The simulations will yield estimates of the expected values – the more the iterations, the closer we get to these expected values; i.e. the simulation error (ϵ) is proportional to the number of iterations (N), where σ is the standard deviation. Thus, increasing the number of iterations above 1000 will yield an error lower than 10%.
9. Earlier versions of the spreadsheet model were applied under the EU-project SILVIA – ‘Sustainable Road Surfaces for Traffic Noise Control’ (Morgan Citation2006, Veisten et al.
Citation2007a) and the Norwegian projects ‘Societal consequences and cost-benefit analyses of low-noise pavements’ (Veisten Citation2006) and “‘TORNADO” – a tool for strategic cost-benefit analyses of noise control measures and other environmental measures’ (Veisten et al.
Citation2007b).
Hanley
,
N.
,
Shogren
,
J.F.
and
White
,
B.
1997
.
Environmental economics in theory and practice
,
New York
:
MacMillan
.
Elvik
,
R.
and
Greibe
,
P.
2005
.
Road safety effects of porous asphalt: a systematic review of evaluation studies
.
Accident Analysis and Prevention
,
37
:
515
–
522
.
Bendtsen
,
H.
2004
.
“
Rolling resistance, fuel consumption and emissions: a literature review
”
. In
Sustainable road surfaces for traffic noise control (SILVIA)
,
Copenhagen, Denmark
:
DTF-ATKINS
.
SILVIA document SILVIA-DTF-ATKINS-007-02-WP3.2-06.02.04
Berbee
,
R.
1999
.
Characterization and treatment of runoff from highways in the Netherlands paved with impervious and pervious asphalt
.
Water Environment Research
,
71
(
2
)
:
183
–
190
.
Pagotto
,
C.
,
Legret
,
M.
and
Le Cloirec
,
P.
2000
.
Comparison of the hydraulic behaviour and the quality of highway runoff water according to the type of pavement
.
Water Resources
,
34
(
18
)
:
4446
–
4454
.
Litzka
,
J.
,
Pracherstorfer
,
W.
and
Vycudil
,
A.
1999
.
“
Beurteilung der drainasphaltreinigung aus ökologischer und ökonomischer Sicht
”
. In
Straßenforschung heft 489
,
Vienna, Austria
:
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Angelegenheiten
.
Pucher
,
E.
2004
.
“
Recommendations on specifications for tyre and vehicle requirements
”
. In
Sustainable road surfaces for traffic noise control (SILVIA)
,
Vienna, Austria
:
Technische Universität Wien (TUW)
.
Deliverable D07, SILVIA-TUW-039-02-WP5-120304
Descornet, G., et al., 1998 Stratégie d'entretien pour les enrobés drainantes, Rapport d'un groupe de travail LIN-MET-CRR. CR 39/98, Brussels, Belgium: Centre de Recherches routières
Lerfald
,
B.O.
2008
.
Miljøvennlige vegdekker: testing av slitasjeegenskaper med Trøger for utvalgte forsøksdekker
,
[Environmentally friendly pavements: testing of wearing properties using Tröger for selected pavement experiments]. SINTEF Report
Trondheim, Norway
:
SINTEF Building and Infrastructure, SINTEF Group
.
27/03-08
Evensen
,
R.
2009
.
Miljøvennlige vegdekker: sluttrapport
,
[Environmentally friendly pavements: final report]. Report No. 2562
Trondheim, Norway
:
Department of Technology and Research, Norwegian Public Roads Administration (NPRA)
.
Morgan
,
P.
, ed.
2006
.
“
Guidance manual for the implementation of low-noise road surfaces. Final report of EC project
”
. In
Sustainable road surfaces for traffic noise control (SILVIA)
,
Brussels, Belgium
:
Forum of European National Highway Research Laboratories (FEHRL)
.
DG TREN – GROWTH, Contract No. GRD2-2000-31801-SI2.335701. FEHRL Report 2006/02
Sandberg
,
U.
2001
.
Abatement of traffic, vehicle, and tire/road noise – the global perspective
.
Noise control engineering journal
,
49
(
4
)
:
170
–
181
.
Morgan
,
P.
, ed.
2006
.
“
Guidance manual for the implementation of low-noise road surfaces. Final report of EC project
”
. In
Sustainable road surfaces for traffic noise control (SILVIA)
,
Brussels, Belgium
:
Forum of European National Highway Research Laboratories (FEHRL)
.
DG TREN – GROWTH, Contract No. GRD2-2000-31801-SI2.335701. FEHRL Report 2006/02
Morgan
,
P.
, ed.
2006
.
“
Guidance manual for the implementation of low-noise road surfaces. Final report of EC project
”
. In
Sustainable road surfaces for traffic noise control (SILVIA)
,
Brussels, Belgium
:
Forum of European National Highway Research Laboratories (FEHRL)
.
DG TREN – GROWTH, Contract No. GRD2-2000-31801-SI2.335701. FEHRL Report 2006/02
CEN
.
1998
.
Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates. Part 9: determination of the resistance to wear by abrasion from studded tyres. Nordic test
,
Brussels, Belgium
:
European Committee for Standardization (CEN)
.
EN 1097-9:1998, April 1998
Snilsberg
,
B.
2008
.
Pavement wear and airborne dust pollution in Norway: characterization of the physical and chemical properties of dust particles
,
Trondheim, Norway
:
Department of Geology and Mineral Resources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
.
Doctoral Theses at NTNU, 2008:133, Thesis for the degree of Doktor Ingeniør (Doctor of Engineering)
Raitanen
,
N.
2005
.
Measuring of noise and wearing of quiet surfaces. Doctoral Dissertation (TKK Dissertations 7)
,
Finland
:
Laboratory of Highway Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology
.
Espoo
Lerfald
,
B.O.
2008
.
Miljøvennlige vegdekker: testing av slitasjeegenskaper med Trøger for utvalgte forsøksdekker
,
[Environmentally friendly pavements: testing of wearing properties using Tröger for selected pavement experiments]. SINTEF Report
Trondheim, Norway
:
SINTEF Building and Infrastructure, SINTEF Group
.
27/03-08
Snilsberg
,
B.
2008
.
Pavement wear and airborne dust pollution in Norway: characterization of the physical and chemical properties of dust particles
,
Trondheim, Norway
:
Department of Geology and Mineral Resources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
.
Doctoral Theses at NTNU, 2008:133, Thesis for the degree of Doktor Ingeniør (Doctor of Engineering)
NIPH
.
2005
.
Eksponering-responsfunksjon for konsekvensutredning. Beregning av antall tilfeller av ulike helseskader som skyldes luftforurensning
,
[Dose response function for impact assessment. Estimation of the number of cases of different health effects caused by air pollution]
Oslo, Norway
:
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH)
.
Snilsberg
,
B.
2008
.
Pavement wear and airborne dust pollution in Norway: characterization of the physical and chemical properties of dust particles
,
Trondheim, Norway
:
Department of Geology and Mineral Resources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
.
Doctoral Theses at NTNU, 2008:133, Thesis for the degree of Doktor Ingeniør (Doctor of Engineering)
Morgan
,
P.
, ed.
2006
.
“
Guidance manual for the implementation of low-noise road surfaces. Final report of EC project
”
. In
Sustainable road surfaces for traffic noise control (SILVIA)
,
Brussels, Belgium
:
Forum of European National Highway Research Laboratories (FEHRL)
.
DG TREN – GROWTH, Contract No. GRD2-2000-31801-SI2.335701. FEHRL Report 2006/02
Veisten
,
K.
Cost-benefit analysis of noise-reducing pavements: simple calculations based on Norwegian data
.
Presented at Network on European Communications and Transport Activities Research (NECTAR) Conference
.
May
2007
.
Porto,
, Portugal
:
Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto
.
Veisten
,
K.
2006
.
“
Nyttekostnadsanalyse av støytiltak
”
. In
Deloppgave 5 – samfunnsmessige konsekvenser og nyttekostnadsberegninger for støysvake vegdekker, [Cost-benefit analysis of noise control measures. Task 5 – Societal impacts and cost-benefit calculations for low-noise pavements].
,
Oslo, Norway
:
Institute of Transport Economics (TØI)
.
TØI Working Paper SM-1751/2006
Veisten
,
K.
2007b
.
‘TORNADO’ – Prioriteringsverktøy for strategiske nyttekostnadsanalyser av støytiltak og andre miljøtiltak, [‘TORNADO’ – a tool for strategic cost-benefit analyses of noise control measures and other environmental measures]
,
Oslo, Norway
:
Institute of Transport Economics (TØI)
.
TØI Working Paper SM-1902/2007