1,024
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Introduction

Destroying the Trojan Horse of ‘Lazy Inclusivism’: Collective Wit of Chinese Children, Parents, and Educators in the Context of ‘Learning in Regular Classroom’

ORCID Icon
Pages 735-741 | Published online: 23 Dec 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Since the publication of the Salamanca Statement, inclusive education has gained prominence at a global range. In China, this has seen the implementation of ‘Learning in Regular Classroom’ – a nationwide program initiated by the Chinese government in the 1980s to make regular schools accessible to children with disabilities. The developments of ‘Learning in Regular Classroom’ over a nearly four-decade time are laudable. Yet structural problems abound and persist. One has been ‘lazy inclusivism’ that insidiously conceals the unequal social order by strategically labelling certain populations as disadvantaged and diligently providing support to them through a mainstream framework that de facto silences their epistemologies and practices. ‘Lazy inclusivism’ sustains an astute system that tailors a cloak of laborious business to shroud its own laziness in achieving inclusion. Such labourious business is paradoxically lazy owing to its reductionist approach to inclusion that shows little interest in deconstructing the conservative understanding of disability, which itself is constructed and sustained within current schooling. This Special Issue collects wisdom of Chinese children, parents, and educators to force ‘lazy inclusivism’ to retreat. At the core of the collective wisdom is agency and resilience, both demonstrating autonomy and power in precarious conditions.

Acknowledgment

I thank the Editor, Robyn M. Gillies, for making this Special Issue possible. Each article in the issue received external reviews in addition to my review as Guest Editor. I therefore thank all the reviewers for their thoughtful work. I also thank Megan Watkins and Greg Noble for their work on ‘lazy multiculturalism’ that informed my discussion of ‘lazy inclusivism’.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council [DE180100107].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 304.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.