Timor-Leste’s foreign policy approach to the Timor Sea disputes: pipeline or pipe dream?

ABSTRACT

Over recent years, Australia and Timor-Leste’s bilateral relationship has been consumed by contested maritime boundary claims in the resource-rich Timor Sea. Intractable disagreements over the right to build a petroleum export pipeline have led Timor-Leste to reinvigorate its pursuit of permanent maritime boundaries as ‘a national priority’. This article examines Timor-Leste’s interests in the Timor Sea and assesses its strategies for achieving its foreign policy goals. It argues that Timor-Leste’s attainment of its stated goals relies on Australia shifting its Timor Sea policy, which has been largely consistent since the 1970s. Timor-Leste’s key strategy is a public diplomacy campaign that positions permanent maritime boundaries as the final stage of its independence struggle, and presents Timor-Leste as owning the disputed Greater Sunrise gas field under international law. While the public diplomacy campaign aims to win enough Australian ‘hearts and minds’ to put pressure on the Australian government, it ultimately fails to negotiate the strategic and historical realities of the interests that define Australia’s realpolitik approach to the Timor Sea.

KEYWORDS:

• Australian foreign policy
• maritime boundaries
• public diplomacy
• Timor-Leste foreign policy
• Timor Sea

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Jasmine Westendorf, Kumuda Simpson, Daniel Bray, Nicholas Barry and Miriam Bankovsky for reading the first draft of this article, as well as those who provided ideas and comments along the way. I would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their very helpful suggestions.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes

1. http://www.gfm.tl/