Reframing the ‘Governance’ Story

Abstract

In recent years the concept of ‘governance’ has become a widely used concept within political science discourse. Although the meanings of ‘governance’ are contested, its position of influence is rarely questioned. This paper contends that the term exercises a prescriptive influence that shapes understandings about how governing should be interpreted and executed in the current era. The paper begins by examining briefly several prominent ‘narratives of governance’ that currently frame contemporary understandings of the term's significance. Attention then turns to an analysis of the return of ‘governance’, conceptually speaking, to the discourse of political science in Australia. The paper identifies when this began to occur and then examines the conceptual load that scholars expected ‘governance’ to carry at that time. These meanings are then counterpoised against the currently dominant cluster of meanings noted earlier in the paper to illustrate that they are not the only ways of interpreting how ‘governance’ should be understood. Furthermore, it will also be suggested that these hegemonic meanings represent a trajectory that, paradoxically, de-politicises what was once a clearly politicised term.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Jim Jose

Jim Jose is a Senior Lecturer in Politics in the School of Economics, Politics and Tourism at the University of Newcastle.