Abstract
This article examines the ideational dimension of federalism and its consequences for the analysis of policy development. With this objective in mind, the article offers an explanation for Canada's rejection of the two main aspects of the ‘Australian model’ of equalisation: the assessment of expenditure needs and the existence of an arms-length commission to determine payments. As argued, the ideological prevalence of provincial autonomy in Canada explains why federal officials opted to reject the ‘Australian model’ as they prepared to establish the country's program and why subsequent reforms never introduced a needs-assessment dimension or created an arms-length agency to administer equalisation. At the theoretical level, this article shows how ideational factors can shape policy outcomes.
Notes
1At a more general level, this issue is typically discussed by students of ‘policy transfer’ and ‘lesson drawing’ (Dolowitz and Marsh Citation2000; Rose Citation2004).
2At first, the program penalised large families, which were overrepresented in Quebec's Catholic society (Marshall Citation1994).
4Australian federalism has arguably been more than ever driven by considerations of efficiency in the last decade (Parkin and Anderson Citation2007) although some have argued that global process have given states some leverage (Galligan and Wright Citation2002).
5There are, of course, indigenous populations in both states, but this cleavage is not central to federalism in either case.
Dolowitz
,
D.
and
Marsh
,
D.
2000
.
‘Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making.’
.
Governance
,
13
(
1
)
:
5
–
24
.
Rose
,
R.
2004
.
Learning Lessons in Comparative Public Policy: A Guide to Analysis
,
London
:
Routledge
.
Marshall
,
D.
1994
.
‘Nationalisme et politiques sociales au Québec depuis 1867: Un siècle de rendez-vous manqués entre l'État, l'Église et les familles.’
.
British Journal of Canadian Studies
,
9
:
301
–
47
.
Courchene
,
T. J.
2007
.
‘A Short History of Equalisation.’
.
Policy Options
,
March
:
22
–
29
.
Courchene
,
T. J.
1984
.
Equalisation Payments: Past, Present and Future
,
Toronto
:
Ontario Economic Council
.
MacNevin
,
A. S.
2004
.
Canadian Federal–Provincial Equalisation Regime: An Assessment
,
Toronto
:
Canada Tax Foundation
.
Milne
,
D.
1998
.
“
‘Equalisation and the Politics of Restraint.’
”
. In
Equalisation: Its Contribution to Canada's Fiscal and Economic Progress
,
Edited by:
Boadway
,
R. W.
and
Hobson
,
P. A.R.
Kingston
:
John Deutsch Institute for the Study of Economic Policy
.
Perry
,
D. B.
1997
.
Financing the Canadian Federation, 1867–1995: Setting the Stage for Change
,
Toronto
:
Canadian Tax Foundation
.
Parkin
,
A.
and
Anderson
,
G.
2007
.
‘The Howard Government, Regulatory Federalism and the Transformation of Commonwealth–State Relations.’
.
Australian Journal of Political Science
,
42
(
2
)
:
295
–
315
.
Galligan
,
B.
and
Wright
,
J. S.F.
2002
.
‘Australian Federalism: A Prospective Assessment.’
.
Publius
,
32
(
2
)
:
147
–
66
.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Daniel Béland
Daniel Béland holds the Canada Research Chair in Public Policy at the Johnson–Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy (University of Saskatchewan campus). André Lecours is an Associate Professor in the School of Political Studies at the University of Ottawa. The authors acknowledge support from Canada's Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC). They also thank Tracy Beck Fenwick, Angela Kempf, and the AJPS reviewers for their comments and suggestions. Finally, Daniel Béland acknowledges support from the Canada Research Chairs Program.