Abstract
Voluntary environmental governance arrangements (VEGAs) are designed to minimise negative outcomes through the use of collectively agreed arrangements. They have attracted a large literature, but issues remain unresolved, especially regarding their effectiveness. This article takes up a small part of this challenge of mapping the role of VEGAs in larger systems of environmental governance by examining the development and implementation of a range of VEGAs in the Australian building sector, here defined as the construction and use of buildings.
人们设计了自愿环境治理计划,意在通过集体认同的安排尽量减少消极结果。它吸引了大量文献的关注,但问题依旧是问题,特别在效率方面。本文试图回答其中一小部分问题,通过考察其在澳大利亚建筑部门(这里定义为建筑和建筑物的使用),看看自愿环境治理计划在更大的环境治理中究竟扮演什么样的角色。
Notes
1Former and present grant administrators in Adelaide (Interviewee #51, 2012); Brisbane (Interviewee #27, 2012); and Melbourne (Interviewee #13, 2011).
2City Switch administrators in Sydney (Interviewee #41, 2012); Adelaide (Interviewee #50, 2012); and Brisbane (Interviewee #35, 2012).
3URL: <http://www.cityswitch.net.au>.
5I borrowed this term from the field of psychology (see Howlin, Magiati and Charman Citation2009).
6Administrators in Melbourne (Interviewee #11, 2011); Brisbane (Interviewee #27, 2012); and Adelaide (Interviewee #51, 2012).
7A project may consist of more than one building.
8VEGA administrators in Sydney (Interviewees #39, #41, #42, 2012); Brisbane (Interviewee #30, 2012); and Melbourne (Interviewee #26, 2012).
9Data from URLs: <http://www.hia.com.au>; <http://www.pulse.buildingcommission.com.au>; <http://www.propertyoz.com.au>.