110
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Locking in Racial Disadvantage in Libertarian Political Economy: The Case of W. H. Hutt and South Africa

, &
Pages 7-19 | Received 03 Jun 2022, Accepted 17 Apr 2023, Published online: 15 Jun 2023
 

Abstract

In their stormy response to Nancy MacLean's book Democracy in Chains, some academics on the libertarian right have conducted a concerted defense of Nobel Laureate James Buchanan's credentials as an anti-racist, or at least a non-racist. An odd component of their argument is a claim of innocence by association: the peripatetic South African economist and Mont Pelerin Society founding member William Harold Hutt was against apartheid; Buchanan was a friend and supporter of Hutt; therefore, Buchanan could not have been abetting segregationists with his support for public funding of segregated private schools. At the core of this chain of argument is the inference that Hutt's opposition to apartheid proves that Hutt himself was committed to racial equality. However, just as there were white supremacists who opposed slavery in the United States, we demonstrate Hutt was a white supremacist who opposed apartheid in South Africa. We document how Hutt embraced notions of black inferiority, even in The Economics of the Colour Bar, his most ferocious attack on apartheid. Whether or not innocence by association is a sound defense of anyone's ideology or conduct, Hutt, himself, was not innocent of white supremacy.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 Hutt was hardly unique in this stance. From the early years of legal racial separation in South Africa there were white opponents of apartheid, primarily on pragmatic grounds, who simultaneously subscribed to the premises of white superiority (Carter Citation1955; Lipton Citation2000). Even in today’s post-apartheid South Africa, many whites who ostensibly are sympathetic to the needs of black South Africans commit so fervently to ‘color blindness’ that they ultimately engage in ‘white denialism’ about the continued presence and impact of racism (van der Westhuizen Citation2019).

2 W. H. Hutt to the Honorable P. W. Botha, 7 August 1981, Hutt Papers, Hoover Institution Archives.

3 W. H. Hutt to the Honorable P. W. Botha, 7 August 1981, Hutt Papers, Hoover Institution Archives.

4 W. H. Hutt to Chief Mangosuthu Gatsha Buthelezi, 4 March 1983, Hutt Papers, Hoover Institution Archives.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 193.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.