ABSTRACT
Investigation of crime is central to the function and purpose of law enforcement. Contemporary investigation depends on a sophisticated arsenal of theories and techniques interacting with law and its institutions in a variety of ways, including authorised unlawful activity. Drawing on Foucault, this article re-imagines the investigation and associated legal architectures as apparatus; a rationality and strategy of governance shaped by intersecting knowledge formations. The paper considers the key characteristics of investigation and its relationship with law, concluding that investigations practices are a form of apparatus, and that aspects of these practices are grounded in a theological dynamic based on surveillance.
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful for the time and generous feedback offered by the anonymous reviewers of this paper.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes
3 Eg A v Hayden (1984) 156 CLR 532; Teixeria de Castro v Portugal (EHRR, 9 June 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-IV); Olmstead v United States 277 US 438 (1928); Katz v United States 389 US 347 (1967); R v Looseley [2001] 4 All ER 897.
5 Of course, these may also be tortious, but for present purposes, the focus is on criminal law.
6 Eg in NSW investigations, operations inducing a person not reasonably expected to engage in those actions; that seriously endanger participants or property; and involving sexual offences may not be authorised. See Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997 (NSW), s7.
9 Oxford English Dictionary.
23 Marx (Citation1974, Citation1980, Citation1981, Citation1982, Citation1985, Citation1987, Citation1988, Citation1992a, Citation1992b); Fijnaut and Marx (Citation1995). The table is adapted from Marx (Citation1988, p 12, Table 1).
29 There are dozens of statutes in Australia regulating investigation. In NSW, see, eg, Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW).
30 At common law see R v Ireland (1970) 126 CLR 321; Bunning v Cross (1978) 141 CLR 54; R v Ridgeway (1995) 184 CLR 19. Under uniform evidence legislation, see s138 Evidence Act 1995.
31 Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (Cth); Telecommunications (Interception and Access)(New South Wales) Act 1979 (NSW); Telecommunications (Interception)(Northern Territory) Act 2001 (NT); Telecommunications Interception Act 2009 (Qld); Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1988 (SA); Telecommunications (Interception) Tasmania Act 1999 (Tas); Telecommunications (State Provisions) Act 1998 (Vic); Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Western Australia Act 2004 (WA).
32 Surveillance Devices Act 2004 (Cth); Crimes (Surveillance Devices) Act 2010 (ACT); Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW); Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NT); Crime and Misconduct Act 2001 (Qld); Listening and Surveillance Devices Act 1972 (SA); Police Powers (Surveillance Devices) Act 2006 (Tas); Surveillance Devices Act 1999 (Vic); Surveillance Devices Act 1998 (WA).
33 There is a complex web of limitations and exclusion of admissions arising under common and uniform evidence law. Eg Part 3.4 Evidence Act 1995; R v Swaffield; Pavic v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 159.
40 Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) (Citation1975), p 106.
43 Eg R v Vuckov and Romeo (1986) 40 SASR 498; R v Papoulias [1988] VicRep 76; R v Venn-Brown (1991) 1 Qd R 458; R v Hsing (1991) 25 NSWLR 685; Ridgeway v The Queen (1995) 184 CLR 19.
46 Ridgeway v The Queen (1995) 184 CLR 19.
47 For analysis of Ridgeway and its aftermath, see Murphy (Citation2014).
48 Eg section 16 of the Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997 (NSW) provides:
Despite any other Act or law, an activity that is engaged in by a participant in an authorised operation in the course of, and for the purposes of, the operation is not unlawful, and does not constitute an offence or corrupt conduct, so long as it is authorised by, and is engaged in in accordance with, the authority for the operation.
49 Nominated participants are authorised to act unlawfully in the bona fide execution of the investigation, and are immune from liability. Section 18(1) of the Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997 (NSW), for example, provides:
Despite any other Act or law, an activity that is engaged in by a person: (a) in connection with a controlled activity, or (b) in connection with an activity referred to in section 17 … is not unlawful, and does not constitute an offence or corrupt conduct, so long as it is engaged in (whether by a participant in an authorised operation or otherwise) in the course of, and for the purposes of, an authorised operation.
50 Investigations must be for ‘criminal’ or ‘corrupt activity’, and may only be issued when the authorising officer has reasonable grounds to suspect the activity reported has, is likely or is taking place, or will take place in the future. See the Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997 (NSW), ss 3, 6.
51 An ordinary authority in NSW has a duration of 6 months, while an urgent authority has a lifespan of 72 hours. Variations are permissible. See Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997 (NSW), ss 8, 10, 12.
52 In NSW only the CEO of the organisation (as defined) is able to authorise a controlled operation. However, there is capacity for a limited delegation to subordinate, but nevertheless senior officers, to authorise. See Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997 (NSW), ss 5, 29.
53 A Code of Conduct for controlled operations is a statutory requirement arising under s20 of the Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997 (NSW). See also Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Regulation 2012 (NSW), Schedule 2.
54 In NSW warrants may not be issued where there is (i) a serious risk of injury, safety, loss or damage to property; (ii) any risk of a sexual offence; (iii) may not involve using a person without adequate training in the investigation; (iv) involve civilians, unless impractical otherwise. In addition, an operation may not involve entrapment as a primary investigative method. See Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997 (NSW), s7.
55 In NSW, written reports from investigations must be provided to authorising officer within two months of completion. See Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997 (NSW), s15.
56 In NSW the Ombudsman has annual reporting obligations to Parliament, and is required to inspect the records of the various authorities annually. See Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997 (NSW), Part 4.
57 R v Ridgeway (1995) 184 CLR 19.
60 Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 (NZ), ss34, 34A.
63 United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (1988), esp. Article 11.
64 See Oxford English Dictionary; contrast Macquarie Dictionary.
74 Foucault's work is complex and nuanced, and it is fair to say there is more written about Foucault than he wrote himself. This is made even more complicated by the fact his work evolved over time, including his conception of dispositif. See Behrent (Citation2013); Golder and Fitzpatrick (Citation2009).
82 Eg A v Hayden (1984) 156 CLR 532.
85 It is important to observe that Foucault did not address the distinction between the continental practice, based on an inquisitorial model, and the adversarial tradition that emerged in England.
88 Embodied in the maxim Actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea. See Haughton v Smith [1976] AC 476.
Michel Foucault (1980) ‘The Confession of the Flesh’ in Colin Gordon (ed) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, 194. Eric Colvin (2002) ‘Controlled Operations, Controlled Activities and Entrapment’ 14 Bond Law Review 227. John Braithwaite et al (1987) ‘Covert Facilitation and Crime: Restoring Balance to the Entrapment Debate’ 43 Journal of Social Issues 5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1987.tb02344.x John Kleinig (1996) The Ethics of Policing, Cambridge University Press. Andrew Ashworth (1998) ‘Should the Police Be Allowed to Use Deceptive Practices?’ 114 Law Quarterly Review 108. Andrew Ashworth (1999) ‘What Is Wrong with Entrapment?’ Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 293. Andrew Ashworth (2002) ‘Re-drawing the Boundaries of Entrapment’ March Criminal Law Review 161. Simon Bronitt (1999) ‘Entrapment, Human Rights and Criminal Justice: A Licence to Deviate?’ 29 Hong Kong Law Journal 216. Simon Bronitt and Declan Roche (2000) ‘Between Rhetoric and Reality: Sociolegal and Republican Perspectives on Entrapment’ 4 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 77. Adam Chernok (2011) ‘Entrapment under Controlled Operations Legislation: A Victorian Perspective’ 35 Criminal Law Journal 361. Brendon Murphy (2014) ‘Retrospective on Ridgeway: Governing Principles of Controlled Operations Law’ 38 Criminal Law Journal 38. Michel Foucault (1989) The Birth of the Clinic, Routledge. Michel Foucault (2005) The Order of Things, Routledge. Michel Foucault (2006) History of Madness, Routledge. Michel Foucault (2003) The Archaeology of Knowledge, Routledge. Benoit Dupont (2003) ‘The New Face of Police Governance in Australia’ 27 Journal of Australian Studies 15. doi: 10.1080/14443050309387867 Peter Grabosky (2001) ‘Crime Control in the 21st Century’ 34 Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 221. doi: 10.1177/000486580103400302 Kerry Milte (1977) Police in Australia, Butterworths. Bob Morris (2007) ‘History of Criminal Investigation’ in Tim Newburn, Tom Williamson and Alan Wright (eds) Handbook of Criminal Investigation, Willan Publishing 15. Dean Wilson and Mark Finnane (2006) ‘From Sleuths to Technicians? Changing Images of the Detective in Victoria’ in Clive Emsley and Haia Shpayer-Makov (eds) Police Detectives in History, 1750–1950, Ashgate 135. Leon Radzinowicz (1956) A History of English Criminal Law and Its Administration from 1750: Volume 2: The Enforcement of the Law, Stevens & Sons. Jean-Paul Brodeur (2010) Police Investigation, Oxford University Press. Robin Bryant (2009) ‘Theories of Criminal Investigation’ in Stephen Tong, Robin Bryant and Miranda Horvath (eds) Understanding Criminal Investigation, Wiley 13. John Horswell (ed) (2004) The Practice of Crime Scene Investigation, CRC Press. Clive Harfield and Karen Harfield (2008b) Intelligence: Investigation, Community and Partnership, Oxford University Press. Peter Stelfox (2009) Criminal Investigation: An Introduction to Principles and Practice, Willan Publishing. Jean-Paul Brodeur (2010) Police Investigation, Oxford University Press. Robin Bryant (2009) ‘Theories of Criminal Investigation’ in Stephen Tong, Robin Bryant and Miranda Horvath (eds) Understanding Criminal Investigation, Wiley 13. Peter Stelfox (2009) Criminal Investigation: An Introduction to Principles and Practice, Willan Publishing. Mike Maguire and Timothy John (1996) ‘Covert and Deceptive Policing in England and Wales: Issues in Regulation and Practice’ 4 European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 316. doi: 10.1163/157181796X00177 Cyrille Fijnaut and Gary T Marx (1995) Undercover: Police Surveillance in Comparative Perspective, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Simon Bronitt (2004) ‘The Law in Undercover Policing: A Comparative Study of Entrapment and Covert Interviewing in Australia, Canada and Europe’ 33 Common Law World Review 35. doi: 10.1350/clwr.33.1.35.25831 Richard Ericson and Kevin Haggerty (1997) Policing the Risk Society, University of Toronto Press. Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) (2005) Practice Advice on Core Investigative Doctrine, ACPO. Mike Maguire (2008) ‘Criminal Investigation and Crime Control’ in Tim Newburn (ed) Handbook of Policing, Willan Publishers 430. Colin Rogers et al (2011) Police Work: Principles and Practice, Willan Publishers. Alan Wright (2002) Policing: An Introduction to Concepts and Practice, Willan Publishing. Peter Stelfox (2009) Criminal Investigation: An Introduction to Principles and Practice, Willan Publishing. Clive Harfield and Karen Harfield (2008a) Covert Investigation, 2nd edn Blackstone’s Practical Policing, Oxford University Press. Clive Harfield (2010) ‘The Governance of Covert Investigation’ 34 Melbourne University Law Review 773. Jack Kuykendall (1982) ‘The Criminal Investigative Process: Toward a Conceptual Framework’ 10 Journal of Criminal Justice 131. doi: 10.1016/0047-2352(82)90004-6 Michael Brown (2001) Criminal Investigation: Law and Practice, Butterworths-Heineman. Karl Kent and Bruce Nelson (2004) ‘Drug Operations’ in John Horswell (ed) The Practice of Crime Scene Investigation, CRC Press. Samuel Candelaria and George Steffen (2003) Drug Interdiction: Partnerships, Legal Principles, and Investigative Methodologies for Law Enforcement, CRC Press. Dennis Fitzgerald (2007) Informants and Undercover Investigations: A Practical Guide to Law, Policy and Procedure, CRC Press. Michael Lyman (2006) Practical Drug Enforcement, 3rd edn, CRC Press. Gary T Marx (1974) ‘Thoughts on a Neglected Category of Social Movement Participant: The Agent Provocateur and the Informant’ 80 American Journal of Sociology 402. doi: 10.1086/225807 Gary T Marx (1980) ‘The New Police Undercover Work’ 8 Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 399. doi: 10.1177/089124168000800402 Gary T Marx (1981) ‘Ironies of Social Control: Authorities as Contributors to Deviance Through Escalation, Nonenforcement and Covert Facilitation’ 28 Social Problems 221. doi: 10.2307/800300 Gary T Marx (1982) ‘Who Really Gets Stung? Some Issues Raised by the New Police Undercover Work’ 28 Crime & Delinquency 165. doi: 10.1177/001112878202800201 Gary T Marx (1985) ‘I’ll Be Watching You: Reflections on the New Surveillance’ in Clive Norris and Dean Wilson (eds) Surveillance, Crime and Social Control, Ashgate. Gary T Marx (1987) ‘Restoring Realism and Logic to the Covert Facilitation Debate’ 43 Journal of Social Issues 43. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1987.tb02345.x Gary T Marx (1988) Undercover: Police Surveillance in America, University of California Press. Gary T Marx (1992a) ‘Under-the-Covers Undercover Operations: Some Reflections on the State’s Use of Sex and Deception in Law Enforcement’ 11 Criminal Justice Ethics 13. doi: 10.1080/0731129X.1992.9991907 Gary T Marx (1992b) ‘When the Guards Guard Themselves: Undercover Tactics Turned Inward’ 2 Policing and Society 151. doi: 10.1080/10439463.1992.9964639 Cyrille Fijnaut and Gary T Marx (1995) Undercover: Police Surveillance in Comparative Perspective, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Gary T Marx (1988) Undercover: Police Surveillance in America, University of California Press. Gary T Marx (1988) Undercover: Police Surveillance in America, University of California Press. Gary T Marx (1988) Undercover: Police Surveillance in America, University of California Press. Gary T Marx (1988) Undercover: Police Surveillance in America, University of California Press. Gary T Marx (1988) Undercover: Police Surveillance in America, University of California Press. Timothy Moore et al (2009) ‘Deceit, Betrayal and the Search for Truth: Legal and Psychological Perspectives on the “Mr Big” Strategy’ 55 Criminal Law Quarterly 348. Steven Smith et al (2009) ‘Using the “Mr Big” Technique to Elicit Confessions: Successful Innovation or Dangerous Development in the Canadian Legal System?’ 15 Psychology, Public Policy and Law 168. doi: 10.1037/a0016962 Steven Smith et al (2010) ‘High-Risk Interrogation: Using the “Mr. Big Technique” to Elicit Confessions’ 34 Law and Human Behavior 39. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9203-y Brendon Murphy and John Anderson (2016) ‘Confessions to Mr Big: A New Rule of Evidence?’ 20 International Journal of Evidence and Proof. doi: 10.1177/1365712715613485 Geoffrey Robertson (1994) ‘Entrapment Evidence: Manna from Heaven, or Fruit of the Poisoned Tree?’ November Criminal Law Review 805. Peter Stelfox (2009) Criminal Investigation: An Introduction to Principles and Practice, Willan Publishing. Daniel Abelson (2003) ‘Sentencing Entrapment: An Overview and Analysis’ 86 Marquette Law Review 773. Jess Mekeel (2006) ‘Misnamed, Misapplied, and Misguided: Clarifying the State of Sentencing Entrapment and Proposing a New Conception of the Doctrine’ 14 William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 1583. John Dyson Heydon (1973) ‘The Problems of Entrapment’ 32 Cambridge Law Journal 268. doi: 10.1017/S0008197300090759 Law Commission (UK) (1977) Criminal Law – Report on Defences of General Application, Law Commission 83. Gerald Dworkin (1985) ‘The Serpent Beguiled Me and I Did Eat: Entrapment and the Creation of Crime’ 4 Law and Philosophy 17. doi: 10.1007/BF00208259 John Braithwaite et al (1987) ‘Covert Facilitation and Crime: Restoring Balance to the Entrapment Debate’ 43 Journal of Social Issues 5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1987.tb02344.x Geoffrey Robertson (1994) ‘Entrapment Evidence: Manna from Heaven, or Fruit of the Poisoned Tree?’ November Criminal Law Review 805. Andrew Ashworth (1998) ‘Should the Police Be Allowed to Use Deceptive Practices?’ 114 Law Quarterly Review 108. Andrew Ashworth (1999) ‘What Is Wrong with Entrapment?’ Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 293. Andrew Ashworth (2000) ‘Testing Fidelity to Legal Values: Official Involvement and Criminal Justice’ 63 The Modern Law Review 633. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.00285 Andrew Ashworth (2002) ‘Re-drawing the Boundaries of Entrapment’ March Criminal Law Review 161. Simon Bronitt (1999) ‘Entrapment, Human Rights and Criminal Justice: A Licence to Deviate?’ 29 Hong Kong Law Journal 216. Simon Bronitt (2002) ‘Sang Is Dead, Loosely Speaking’ Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 374. Simon Bronitt and Declan Roche (2000) ‘Between Rhetoric and Reality: Sociolegal and Republican Perspectives on Entrapment’ 4 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 77. David Ormerod and Andrew Roberts (2002) ‘The Trouble with Teixeira: Developing a Principled Approach to Entrapment’ 6 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 3. Hock Lai Ho (2011) ‘State Entrapment’ 31 Legal Studies 71. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2010.00176.x Brendon Murphy and John Anderson (2014) ‘After the Serpent Beguiled Me: Entrapment and Sentencing in Australian and Canada’ 39 Queen's Law Journal 621. Marcus Dubber (2005) The Police Power: Patriarchy and the Foundations of American Government, Columbia University Press. Geoffrey Robertson (1994) ‘Entrapment Evidence: Manna from Heaven, or Fruit of the Poisoned Tree?’ November Criminal Law Review 805. Simon Bronitt (1999) ‘Entrapment, Human Rights and Criminal Justice: A Licence to Deviate?’ 29 Hong Kong Law Journal 216. Simon Bronitt (2002) ‘Sang Is Dead, Loosely Speaking’ Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 374. Simon Bronitt (2004) ‘The Law in Undercover Policing: A Comparative Study of Entrapment and Covert Interviewing in Australia, Canada and Europe’ 33 Common Law World Review 35. doi: 10.1350/clwr.33.1.35.25831 Simon Bronitt and Declan Roche (2000) ‘Between Rhetoric and Reality: Sociolegal and Republican Perspectives on Entrapment’ 4 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 77. Simon Bronitt and Declan Roche (2001) ‘Entrapment, the Art of Police Deception’ 73 AQ: Australian Quarterly 20. Francois Eugene Vidocq (2003) Memoirs of Vidocq: Master of Crime, AK Press. Leon Radzinowicz (1956) A History of English Criminal Law and Its Administration from 1750: Volume 2: The Enforcement of the Law, Stevens & Sons. Philip Rawlings (2002) Policing: A Short History, Willan Publishing. Clive Emsley and Haia Shpayer-Makov (eds) (2006) Police Detectives in History, 1750–1950, Ashgate. House of Commons (1833) Report from the Select Committee on the Petition of Frederick Young and Others, House of Commons. House of Commons (1853) The Speeches of the Late Right Honourable Sir Robert Peel Delivered in the House of Commons, George Routledge & Co. Secretary of State for the Home Department (UK) (1929) Report of the Royal Commission on Police Powers and Procedure, HM Stationery Office. Law Commission (UK) (1977) Criminal Law – Report on Defences of General Application, Law Commission 83. C Philips (1980) The Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure. Report. The Investigation and Prosecution of Criminal Offences in England and Wales: The Law and Procedure. Law Commission (UK) (1977) Criminal Law – Report on Defences of General Application, Law Commission 83. Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) (1975) Report No. 2: An Interim Report: Criminal Investigation, Australian Law Reform Commission. Geoffrey Robertson (1994) ‘Entrapment Evidence: Manna from Heaven, or Fruit of the Poisoned Tree?’ November Criminal Law Review 805. Sybil Sharpe (1996) ‘Covert Policing: A Comparative View’ 25 Anglo-American Law Review 163. Cyrille Fijnaut and Gary T Marx (1995) Undercover: Police Surveillance in Comparative Perspective, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Ethan Nadelmann (1990) ‘Global Prohibitions Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society’ 44 International Organisation 479. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300035384 Ethan Nadelmann (1994) Cops Across Borders: The Internationalization of U.S. Criminal Law Enforcement, Pennsylvania State University Press. Peter Andreas and Ethan Nadelmann (2006) Policing the Globe: Criminalization and Crime Control in International Relations, Oxford University Press. Ben Bowling and James Sheptycki (2012) Global Policing, Sage. Donald Stewart (1986) Royal Commission of Inquiry into Alleged Telephone Interceptions, Australian Government Publishing Service. Justice James Wood (1997) Report of the Royal Commission into the NSW Police Service, New South Wales Government. Brendon Murphy (2014) ‘Retrospective on Ridgeway: Governing Principles of Controlled Operations Law’ 38 Criminal Law Journal 38. Simon Bronitt (1999) ‘Entrapment, Human Rights and Criminal Justice: A Licence to Deviate?’ 29 Hong Kong Law Journal 216. Clive Harfield and Karen Harfield (2008a) Covert Investigation, 2nd edn Blackstone’s Practical Policing, Oxford University Press. Simon McKay (2011) Covert Policing: Law and Practice, Oxford University Press. Mark Moore (1977) Buy and Bust: The Effective Regulation of an Illicit Heroin Market, Lexington Books. PD Cutting (1983) ‘The Technique of Controlled Delivery as a Weapon in Dealing with Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances’ 34 UNODC Bulletin on Narcotics 15. Michel Foucault (2007) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France 1977–1978, Palgrave Macmillan. Michel Foucault (1998) The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge, Penguin. Michel Foucault (1980) ‘The Confession of the Flesh’ in Colin Gordon (ed) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, 194. Michel Foucault (1980) ‘The Confession of the Flesh’ in Colin Gordon (ed) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, 194. Michel Foucault (1980) ‘The Confession of the Flesh’ in Colin Gordon (ed) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, 194. Giorgio Agamben (2009) What Is an Apparatus? Stanford University Press. Gilles Deleuze (1991) ‘What Is a Dispositif?’ in TJ Armstrong (ed) Michel Foucault: Philosopher, Harvester Wheatsheaf 159. Gilles Deleuze (1991) ‘What Is a Dispositif?’ in TJ Armstrong (ed) Michel Foucault: Philosopher, Harvester Wheatsheaf 159. Mitchell Dean (2010) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, 2nd edn, Sage Publications. Kaspar Villadsen (2008) ‘Doing Without State and Civil Society as Universals: ‘Dispositifs’ of Care Beyond the Classic Sector Divide’ 4 Journal of Civil Society 171. doi: 10.1080/17448680802559768 Kaspar Villadsen (2011) ‘Modern Welfare and “Good Old” Philanthropy’ 13 Public Management Review 1057. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2011.622675 Michael Behrent (2013) ‘Foucault and Technology’ 29 History and Technology: An International Journal 54. doi: 10.1080/07341512.2013.780351 Ben Golder and Peter Fitzpatrick (2009) Foucault’s Law, Taylor & Francis. Jeffrey Bussolini (2010) ‘What Is a Dispositif?’ 10 Foucault Studies 85. Matteo Pasquinelli (2015) ‘What an Apparatus Is Not: On the Archeology of the Norm in Foucault, Canguilhem, and Goldstein’ 22 Parrhesia 79. Sverre Raffnsøe et al (2014) ‘Foucault’s Dispositive: The Perspicacity of Dispositive Analytics in Organisational Research’ Organisation 1. Jeffrey Bussolini (2010) ‘What Is a Dispositif?’ 10 Foucault Studies 85. Gary Gutting (1989) Michel Foucault’s Archaeology of Scientific Reason, Cambridge University Press. Hubert Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow (1982) Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, University of Chicago Press. Gary Gutting (1989) Michel Foucault’s Archaeology of Scientific Reason, Cambridge University Press. Nick Hardy (2013) ‘A History of the Method: Examining Foucault’s Research Methodology’ in Robert Porter, Iain Mackenzie and Benoît Dillet (eds) The Edinburgh Companion to Poststructuralism, Edinburgh University Press 95. Mary Beth Mader (2014) ‘Knowledge’ in Leonard Lawlor and John Nale (eds) The Cambridge Foucault Lexicon, Cambridge University Press 226. Immanuel Kant (1996) Critique of Pure Reason, Hackett Publishing Co. Alan Norrie (2005) Law and the Beautiful Soul, GlassHouse Press. Richard Ericson (2007) Crime in an Insecure World, Polity Press. Brendon Murphy (2015) Zone of Impeachment: A Post-Foucauldian Analysis of Controlled Operations Law and Policy, Newcastle Law School University of Newcastle. Michel Foucault (1994) ‘Truth and Juridical Forms’ in James Faubion (ed) Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Editions Gallimard edn, Penguin 1. Lisi Oliver (2002) The Beginnings of English Law, University of Toronto Press. Leslie Downer (ed) (1972) Leges Henrici Primi, Oxford University Press. Bruce O’Brien (1999) God’s Peace & King’s Peace: The Laws of Edward Confessor, University of Pennsylvania Press. John Baker (2002) An Introduction to English Legal History, Oxford University Press. Giorgio Agamben (2011) The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government, Stanford University Press. Mitchell Dean (2012) ‘The Signature of Power’ 5 Journal of Political Power 101. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2012.659864 Mitchell Dean (2013) The Signature of Power, Sage Publications. Giorgio Agamben (2011) The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government, Stanford University Press. Mitchell Dean (2012) ‘The Signature of Power’ 5 Journal of Political Power 101. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2012.659864 Mitchell Dean (2013) The Signature of Power, Sage Publications.