123
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CLINICAL GOVERNANCE

‘Governance of’ and ‘Governance by’: implementing a clinical governance framework in an area mental health service

&
Pages 69-73 | Published online: 06 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Objective: A framework developed to promote the understanding and application of clinical governance principles in an area mental health service is described. The framework is operationalized through systems, processes, roles and responsibilities.

Methods: The development of an explicit and operationalizable framework for clinical governance arose from the authors’ experiences in leading and managing mental health services. There is a particular emphasis on improvement of quality of care and patient safety. The framework is informed by recent developments in thinking about clinical governance, including key documents from Australia and the United Kingdom.

Results: The operational nature of the framework allows for key components of clinical governance to be described explicitly, communicated effectively, and continually tested and improved. Further consideration and assessment of the value of differing approaches to this task are required. For example, a general, illustrative approach to raise clinician awareness can be contrasted with prescriptive and specified approaches which progressively encompass the many functions and processes of a mental health service.

Conclusions: Mental health clinicians and managers can be guided by a framework that will ensure safe, high quality and continually improving processes of care.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.