1,078
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Applied Research

Debate Preparation/Participation: An Active, Effective Learning Tool

, , , &
Pages 235-238 | Received 18 Sep 2007, Published online: 09 Jul 2008
 

Abstract

Background: Passive educational techniques (such as lectures) are thought to be less productive than active learning. Purpose: We examined whether preparing for and participating in a debate would be an effective, active way to learn about a controversial topic. Methods: We compared quiz performance in residents who attended a lecture to residents who prepared for/participated in a debate. Twelve residents each participated in one lecture session and one debate session. Learning was evaluated via a quiz. Quizzes were given twice: before the debate/lecture and 1 week after the debate/lecture. Quiz scores were compared using repeated measures analysis of variance, with a p value of < .05 considered significant. A survey evaluating the usefulness of debating was given to all participants. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the pretest mean quiz score between the debate and lecture groups: 78.3% and 52.5%, respectively ( p = .02). Similarly, on posttest quizzes, the average debater scored 85.8%, versus 61.7% for the lecture group ( p = .003). Although no one in the debate group scored lower on a follow-up quiz, 3 residents in the lecture group did worse on follow-up. Conclusions: When learning about a controversial topic, residents who prepared for/participated in a debate achieved higher quiz scores and were better at retaining information than those who attended a lecture. When faced with teaching a controversial topic, organizing a debate may be more effective than giving a lecture.

Acknowledgments

We thank Stephanie Baldwin, NYU Director of Education, for organizational assistance; Dorice Vieira, MLS, MA, for her invaluable research contributions; Patricia Veloso, MD, for anesthesia expertise; and finally the house staff at NYU, who teach us every day.

Notes

a p values for differences within debate and lecture groups.

b p values for differences between debate and lecture groups.

a p values for differences within debate and lecture groups.

b p values for differences between debate and lecture groups.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 464.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.