Abstract
Issue: Students devote hundreds of hours to writing notes during medical school clerkships but receive very limited feedback on that work. Medical student notes are like college essays—both are persuasive compositions. But attending physicians rarely scrutinize student notes like college professors analyze essays. This is a missed opportunity to teach clinical reasoning. Evidence: A survey at our institution showed that only 16% of students received written feedback and 31% received oral feedback on their notes from more than 3 attending physicians during the first 8 months of 3rd-year clerkships. Many studies have reported a paucity of feedback across multiple domains and a sense among students that clinical reasoning is not being adequately taught during clerkships. Meanwhile, college professors teach written composition and reasoning through interactive methods that help students to develop structured, well-reasoned arguments. A recent study showed that 85% of Oxford undergraduates favored these demanding and time-intensive tutorials. Implications: Attending physicians who adopt a tutorial-based approach toward their students' notes would have a forum to teach clinical reasoning and emphasize the importance of written composition in medical practice.
Keywords:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
William Feldman is now with Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
FUNDING
The UCSF Human Research Protection Program Committee on Human Research granted exempt status for the research under category 4 of 45 CFR 46.
Notes
* This survey was conducted by one of the authors as a needs-assessment.