Should Conflict Research End after Peace Achieved? The Case of Aceh

Abstract

A large body of literature focusing on the Aceh conflict now exists as a result of the intellectual journey to comprehend Aceh separatism since it began in 1976. This essay discusses the evolution of research on the Aceh conflict and argues that research should continue, even though peace has prevailed since 2005. Aside from providing opportunities to obtain new evidence to challenge conventional explanations, conflict research also provides opportunities to acquire knowledge and wisdom from the past to support long-term peacebuilding. Research should be expanded, particularly on agendas that have received little attention but will significantly contribute to preserving collective memory, preventing recurring conflict, and handling conflict trauma.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Edwin M. B. Tambunan

Edwin M. B. Tambunan is an Associate Professor of International Relations at the Pelita Harapan University and a member of Forum Akademisi untuk Papua Damai (Academics Forum for Peaceful Papua). He received his master’s degree from Gadjah Mada University with scholarship support from Okumesnisches Studienwerk (OSW), Bochum, Germany. In 2016, he completed his doctoral program in International Relations through the Australia Awards scholarship at the School of History and International Relations, Flinders University, Adelaide, with a research focus on peace studies and conflict resolution. Edwin has a primary interest in security, conflict, and peace studies. He is also active in promoting and educating peace for youth through his community service program, “Youth & Peace Project.” E-mail: [email protected]