Abstract
Results from soil, diesel emission and ambient air control particulate matter samples on the determination of 30 PAHs were evaluated to establish whether the use of recovery data would result in an improvement of the quantitation accuracy over the uncorrected data. The performance of the recovery-corrected technique was initially evaluated using recovery results from PAH standard reference material samples spiked with analogue deuterated isotopes. The results showed an excellent correlation between recoveries of natives and corresponding surrogates for all matrices studied. The practical merit of the isotope dilution mass spectrometry technique was further assessed by spiking control samples with corresponding isotopic analogues and comparing the measured concentration of natives obtained with uncorrected and recovery-corrected techniques. The data revealed that the use of recovery correction leads to results closer to the real values, thus decreasing the negative bias due to losses that occur during the analytical process. The mean accuracy difference between uncorrected and corrected data is more pronounced as the sample matrix becomes more complex, such as soil (15 ± 12%) or diesel emission (8 ± 11%), and less for simpler ambient air matrix samples (3 ± 16%). Precision between the two techniques was comparable within each matrix and relatively close between the different matrices.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Ewa Dabek, of Environment Canada, for her valuable comments and technical revision of this manuscript.