274
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Analgesic and Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Indole Derivatives

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 7732-7753 | Received 28 Apr 2022, Accepted 18 Oct 2022, Published online: 10 Nov 2022
 

Abstract

Some indole analogues show a good analgesic activity but on the other hand, it has some serious side effects like gastric ulcer. Therefore, there is still a need to develop derivatives of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with fewer side effects. For this purpose, some indole derivatives were prepared with objectives to develop new derivatives with maximum efficacy and minimum side effects. 1-(1H-indol-1-yl)-2-(sübstituephenoxy)-ethan-1-one derivatives (M1–M4) were analyzed further by thin-layer chromatorgarphy (TLC), melting point, IR, and 1H-NMR. The synthesized compounds then underwent oral toxicity studies that include hematological, biochemical, and histopathological findings. The compound was then evaluated for in vivo anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities on carrageenan-induced rat paw edema and acetic acid-induced writhing methods. As a result of the biological activities, promising results were obtained in the compound M2 (2-(2-aminophenoxy)-1-(1H-indol-1-yl)ethanone) and it was subjected to further studies. It was found that compound M2 was practically nontoxic, and no clinical abnormalities were found in hematology and biochemistry, correlated with histopathological observation. It also showed significant anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities at its oral high dose (400 mg/kg). The study suggested that compound M2 was found to have significant anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities. The possible mechanism of M2 might suggest being act as a central anti-nociceptive agent and peripheral inhibitor of painful inflammation. The possible mechanism of action of the compounds whose biological activity was evaluated was explained by molecular docking study against COX-1 and COX-2, and the most active compound M2 formed −9.3 and −8.3 binding energies against COX-1 and COX-2. In addition, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of both M2’s complexes with COX-1 and COX-2 was performed to examine the stability and behavior of the molecular docking pose, and the MM-PBSA binding free energies were measured as −153.820 ± 11.782 and −172.604 ± 9.591, respectively. Based on computational ADME studies, compounds comply with the limiting guidelines.

Acknowledgments

All computational studies presented in the study were carried out with resources provided by TUBTAK (Turkish Scientific and Technological Research Council), ULAKBIM (Turkish Academic Network and Information Centre), and TRUBA (High Performance and Grid Computing Centre).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,492.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.