Abstract
While standing on a force platform, participants were subjected to passive restraint by being strapped to a vertical surface at the head, shoulders, hips, and knees. Despite the restraint, small movements of the body were possible. During restraint, there was no imposed motion of any kind. Twenty-two percent of participants became motion sick, suggesting that passive restraint during stance may be inherently nauseogenic. Motion sickness was preceded by changes in displacements of the center of pressure. During passive restraint, the amplitude of center of pressure displacements tended to increase over time for the participants who later reported motion sickness, whereas for participants who did not report motion sickness, center of pressure displacements tended to be stable over time. The results are consistent with predictions made by the postural instability theory of motion sickness (CitationRiccio & Stoffregen, 1991).
Notes
1We take as given the idea that claustrophobia is not related to motion sickness etiology in the absence of passive restraint (e.g., on ships, in automobiles). In a study of motion sickness during unrestrained stance, CitationBonnet et al. (2006) measured claustrophobia symptoms before and after exposure to potentially nauseogenic visual motion. There were no pre-post differences in claustrophobia scores for participants who became motion sick or for those who did not.
*p < .05.