Publication Cover
Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications
An International Journal of Computation and Methodology
Volume 70, 2016 - Issue 4
84
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparisons of solving procedures and computation time for Fast Cosine Transformation and Matrix Multiplication Transformation in spectral methods application

&
Pages 384-398 | Received 03 Oct 2015, Accepted 25 Feb 2016, Published online: 21 Jul 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Taking the strongly nonlinear energy conservation equation and the transient diffusion equations as examples, the differences of solving procedure and the computation time are compared and discussed between the fast cosine transformation (FCT) and the matrix multiplication transformation (MMT) in the application of spectral methods. To compare the solving procedures for the energy equation, the temperature distribution in the fin with variable thermal conductivity, variable heat transfer coefficient, and internal heat generation are considered. To compare the computation time, the transient diffusion equations in 1D and 2D enclosures, which contain the Poisson operator and the source term, are analyzed. All variables are approximated by the Chebyshev polynomials and all equations are discretized by the Chebyshev–Gauss–Lobatto (CGL) collocation points in space. The comparisons indicate that the FCT can be adopted to solve the strongly nonlinear equation directly and it can provide the same accuracy as MMT does. The comparison of computation time indicates that the MMT is faster than the FCT when the grid number is small or moderate (less than 200), while, if the grid number is large (greater than 200), the FCT is more faster than the MMT.

Nomenclature

A=

dimensionless parameter of thermal conductivity

a=

adjustment parameter

B=

matrix defined in Eqs. (8) & (11)

Ci=

dimensionless internal heat generation parameters

ci=

internal heat generation parameters

=

identified coefficients

D=

derivative matrix

F=

matrix defined in Eqs. (8) & (11)

h=

Convective heat transfer coefficient, W/(m2 · K)

i, j, k=

index counters

L=

length of fin, m

N=

grid number

Ncc=

dimensionless convection-conduction parameter

Nrc=

dimensionless radiation-conduction parameter

q=

internal heat generation, W/m3

T=

temperature, K

t=

time, s

u=

normal variable defined in Eq. (27)

X=

dimensionless Cartesian coordinate in horizontal direction

x=

Cartesian coordinate in horizontal direction, m

y=

Cartesian coordinate in vertical direction, m

α=

linear coefficient defined in thermal conductivity

δ=

half thickness of fin, m

ϵ=

emissivity of wall, error

λ=

thermal conductivity, W/(m · K)

ρ=

source term defined in Eq. (23)

σ=

Stefan–Boltzmann constant, 5.67 × 10−8 W/(m2 · K4)

Θ=

dimensionless temperature

Subscripts=
a=

of convection sink

b=

of fin-base

bench=

of benchmark result

FCT=

of fast cosine transformation result

exact=

of exact solution

i, j, k=

of index counters

max=

of maximum value

s=

of radiation sink

Superscripts=
n=

of the nth time step value

β=

exponential index defined in convective heat transfer coefficient

*=

of the last iterative value

´=

matrices after exchange

+=

direction from physical to spectral spaces

=

direction from spectral to physical spaces

(1), (2)=

first and second order

Nomenclature

A=

dimensionless parameter of thermal conductivity

a=

adjustment parameter

B=

matrix defined in Eqs. (8) & (11)

Ci=

dimensionless internal heat generation parameters

ci=

internal heat generation parameters

=

identified coefficients

D=

derivative matrix

F=

matrix defined in Eqs. (8) & (11)

h=

Convective heat transfer coefficient, W/(m2 · K)

i, j, k=

index counters

L=

length of fin, m

N=

grid number

Ncc=

dimensionless convection-conduction parameter

Nrc=

dimensionless radiation-conduction parameter

q=

internal heat generation, W/m3

T=

temperature, K

t=

time, s

u=

normal variable defined in Eq. (27)

X=

dimensionless Cartesian coordinate in horizontal direction

x=

Cartesian coordinate in horizontal direction, m

y=

Cartesian coordinate in vertical direction, m

α=

linear coefficient defined in thermal conductivity

δ=

half thickness of fin, m

ϵ=

emissivity of wall, error

λ=

thermal conductivity, W/(m · K)

ρ=

source term defined in Eq. (23)

σ=

Stefan–Boltzmann constant, 5.67 × 10−8 W/(m2 · K4)

Θ=

dimensionless temperature

Subscripts=
a=

of convection sink

b=

of fin-base

bench=

of benchmark result

FCT=

of fast cosine transformation result

exact=

of exact solution

i, j, k=

of index counters

max=

of maximum value

s=

of radiation sink

Superscripts=
n=

of the nth time step value

β=

exponential index defined in convective heat transfer coefficient

*=

of the last iterative value

´=

matrices after exchange

+=

direction from physical to spectral spaces

=

direction from spectral to physical spaces

(1), (2)=

first and second order

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 716.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.