Publication Cover
Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals
An International Journal of Computation and Methodology
Volume 73, 2018 - Issue 2
198
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Use of porous-continuum and continuum models for determining the permeability of porous cavities under turbulent free convection

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 78-93 | Received 13 Sep 2017, Accepted 11 Dec 2017, Published online: 18 Jan 2018
 

ABSTRACT

The aim of this work is to estimate the permeability of porous enclosures for numerical solutions of turbulent natural convection in a square cavity. The motivation is that available permeability correlations were proposed based on force rather than natural convection through permeable media. Although commonly seen as a medium property, permeability is measured with a flow through the permeable structure and, as such, its value may carry a flow type dependency. Here, it is assumed that a fixed amount of a solid conducting material is distributed within the cavity and two mathematical models are used and compared when calculating the cavity Nusselt number. First, a porous-continuum model is considered based on the assumption that the solid and the fluid phases are observed as a single medium, over which volume- and time-averaged transport equations apply. Second, a continuum model is used to solve local momentum and energy equations, in both the solid and void spaces, through a conjugate heat transfer solution. The average Nusselt number at the hot wall obtained from the porous-continuum model for several Darcy numbers are compared with those obtained with the continuum model using up to N = 1,024 obstacles within the cavity. When comparing the two methodologies, this study shows that the average Nusselt number calculated by each approach differs by as much as 32% when the number of obstacles N is increased to 1,024. Based on that, an adjustment on the used correlation for calculating the porous medium permeability is proposed to match the Nusselt numbers calculated with the two models. Results indicate that the use of the new correlation gives results for Nu that differ less than about 4% for the range 4 < N < 1,024.

Nomenclature

α=

fluid thermal diffusivity, m2/s

β=

fluid thermal expansion coefficient, 1/K

cF=

Forchheimer coefficient

cp=

fluid specific heat, J/kg °C

Da=

Darcy number,

Dp=

square rod size, m

ΔV=

representative elementary volume, m3

=

fluid volume inside Δ V

g=

gravity acceleration vector, m/s2

h=

heat transfer coefficient, W/m2 °C

H=

square cavity height, m

K=

, permeability, m2

kf=

fluid thermal conductivity, W/m °C

ks=

solid thermal conductivity, W/m °C

μ=

fluid dynamic viscosity, N s/m2

N=

number of obstacles

ν=

fluid kinematic viscosity, m2/s

Nu=

Nu = hH/keff, Nusselt number

Nuc=

Nusselt number for the continuum model

Nupc=

Nusselt number for the porous-continuum model

ϕ=

, porosity

Pr=

Pr = ν/αeff, Prandtl number

Ra=

, fluid Rayleigh number

Ram=

, Darcy–Rayleigh number

ρ=

fluid density, kg/m3

T=

temperature,°C

u=

microscopic velocity, m/s

uD=

Darcy or superficial velocity (volume average of u),

φ=

general variable

=

intrinsic average

=

volume average

iφ=

spatial deviation

=

absolute value (Abs)

φ=

vectorial general variable

φeff=

effective value,

φs,f=

solid/fluid

φH,C=

hot/cold

=

macroscopic/porous continuum

Nomenclature

α=

fluid thermal diffusivity, m2/s

β=

fluid thermal expansion coefficient, 1/K

cF=

Forchheimer coefficient

cp=

fluid specific heat, J/kg °C

Da=

Darcy number,

Dp=

square rod size, m

ΔV=

representative elementary volume, m3

=

fluid volume inside Δ V

g=

gravity acceleration vector, m/s2

h=

heat transfer coefficient, W/m2 °C

H=

square cavity height, m

K=

, permeability, m2

kf=

fluid thermal conductivity, W/m °C

ks=

solid thermal conductivity, W/m °C

μ=

fluid dynamic viscosity, N s/m2

N=

number of obstacles

ν=

fluid kinematic viscosity, m2/s

Nu=

Nu = hH/keff, Nusselt number

Nuc=

Nusselt number for the continuum model

Nupc=

Nusselt number for the porous-continuum model

ϕ=

, porosity

Pr=

Pr = ν/αeff, Prandtl number

Ra=

, fluid Rayleigh number

Ram=

, Darcy–Rayleigh number

ρ=

fluid density, kg/m3

T=

temperature,°C

u=

microscopic velocity, m/s

uD=

Darcy or superficial velocity (volume average of u),

φ=

general variable

=

intrinsic average

=

volume average

iφ=

spatial deviation

=

absolute value (Abs)

φ=

vectorial general variable

φeff=

effective value,

φs,f=

solid/fluid

φH,C=

hot/cold

=

macroscopic/porous continuum

Additional information

Funding

The authors are thankful to CAPES, CNPq, and FAPESP, research-funding agencies Brazil, for their continuous and invaluable financial support during the course of this research.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 486.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.