66
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Statistical Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Extraction Techniques for Determining Robenidine Levels in Poultry Feed

, , &
Pages 19-33 | Published online: 04 Feb 2008
 

Abstract

The importance of sample preparation techniques cannot be overstated as the accurate sample preparation is essential. Often overlooked, it is the midway point where the analytes from the sample matrix are transformed so they are suitable for analysis. Even the best analytical techniques cannot rectify problems generated by sloppy sample pre-treatment. In the present work effectiveness of six different commonly applied extraction techniques for the determination of robenidine in poultry feed has been compared. The result analysis was performed using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis (K-W) test and cluster analysis. The extraction performance of shaking, Soxhlet, Soxtec, ultrasonically assisted extraction (UAE), microwave–assisted extraction (MAE) and accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) was investigated. Operation parameters such as extraction pressure, extraction temperature and extraction time were evaluated as the variable parameters under the experimental ranges of 1000–2500 psi, 60–140°C and from 1 minute up to 6 hours, respectively. The effect of operation parameters during extraction on the recovery of robenidine from poultry feed, reproducibility of the methods and solvent consumption were investigated using spiked samples. Every single extract was subjected to clean–up using aluminium oxide column (Pasteur pipette filled with 1 g of aluminium oxide) from which robenidine was eluted with 10 ml of methanol. The eluate from the clean-up column was collected in a volumetric flask and analyzed by HPLC–DAD–MS technique. In general, all extraction techniques allowed the isolation of robenidine from poultry feed, but the recovery obtained by means of modern extraction techniques (ASE, MAE) was higher than that obtained with conventional techniques (Soxhlet, UAE). Also, RSD showed to be lower for novel extraction techniques.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 451.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.