1,240
Views
48
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Relations of Children's Effortful Control and Teacher–Child Relationship Quality to School Attitudes in a Low-Income Sample

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 434-460 | Published online: 01 Jun 2011
 

Abstract

Research Findings: The purpose of this study was to examine the relations of children's effortful control and quality of relationships with teachers to school attitudes longitudinally in an ethnically diverse and economically disadvantaged sample. Data were collected as part of a larger intervention project during mid-fall, winter, and late spring (ns = 823, 722, and 758, respectively) for 2 cohorts of 3- to 5-year-olds (collected during 2 different school years). Children's effortful control was assessed in the fall with parents' and teachers' reports and 2 behavioral measures. Teacher–child relationship quality was assessed mid-year with teachers' reports of closeness and conflict. Attitudes toward school were assessed in late spring using teachers' and students' reports of school avoidance and liking. Effortful control, in general, was positively correlated with teacher–child closeness and school liking and negatively correlated with conflict and school avoidance. Using structural equation modeling and controlling for sex and ethnicity, we found that effortful control was positively related to teacher–child relationship quality, which in turn was positively related to school attitudes. Furthermore, the relation of effortful control to school attitudes was mediated by teacher–child relationship quality. Practice or Policy: Results provide evidence for the importance of relational processes that take place within the classroom context and have implications for teachers and clinicians working to increase school success in ethnic minority and low-income children.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This research was supported by a grant to Nancy Eisenberg (principal investigator), Tracy Spinrad, Carlos Valiente, and the School Readiness Consortium from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Notes

Note. EC = effortful control.

a Sex difference, t(802) = 6.54, p < .001.

b Sex difference, t(630) = 5.06, p < .001.

c Sex difference, t(785) = 4.09, p < .001.

d Sex difference, t(720) = 3.81, p < .001.

e Sex difference, t(692) = 3.88, p < .001.

f Sex difference, t(678) = 3.20, p < .01.

Note. T = teacher report; T1 = Time 1; P = parent report; T2 = Time 2; T3 = Time 3; S = student report.

p < .10. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.

**p < .01. ***p < .001.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 290.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.