583
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

How Much for Whom? Lessons From an Efficacy Study of Modest Professional Development for Child Care Providers

, , , &
Pages 421-441 | Published online: 07 Dec 2013
 

Abstract

Research Findings: Examining the effects of professional development of the early childhood workforce that fit within the constraints of government policy is crucial for identifying types and amounts of effective training and informing child care policy. The present study used a cluster-randomized trial to evaluate the effects of a professional development program for child care providers designed to meet the criteria for 2 state-level policies: (a) that child care providers working in licensed centers engage in 10 hr of professional development annually and (b) that all licensed child care settings provide 30 min of developmentally appropriate literacy activity daily. Results indicated that 10 hr of professional development focused on literacy was effective for significantly improving the literacy practices and knowledge of child care providers. However, it was not effective in eliciting substantial growth in child literacy outcomes, at least in the short term. The lack of child outcomes illustrates the importance of measuring professional development effects at both the provider and child levels. Practice or Policy: This study illustrates the importance of critically questioning and analyzing state policy, particularly dosage. In practice, dosage is an influential factor in how professional development is selected by programs and providers, because most policies only specify a required number of hours to be completed. The design of policy, which can influence both provider practice and child outcomes, relies upon alignment between early childhood research and policy.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Michigan 4C Association and personnel from the two regional offices of the Association that partnered with us for this study. We thank the Families and Communities Together Coalition and the Michigan State University Literacy Achievement Research Center for funding to support the study.

Notes

Note. ELLCO = Early Language and Literacy Classroom Observation; ELSA = Early Literacy Skills Assessment.

Note. ELLCO = Early Language and Literacy Classroom Observation.

Note. ELSA = Early Literacy Skills Assessment.

a Effect size: −.18.

b Effect size: .10.

*p < .01.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 290.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.