1,070
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Deceived, Disgusted, and Defensive: Motivated Processing of Anti-Tobacco Advertisements

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1223-1232 | Published online: 29 Aug 2017
 

ABSTRACT

A 2 × 2 experiment was conducted, where participants watched anti-tobacco messages that varied in deception (content portraying tobacco companies as dishonest) and disgust (negative graphic images) content. Psychophysiological measures, self-report, and a recognition test were used to test hypotheses generated from the motivated cognition framework. The results of this study indicate that messages containing both deception and disgust push viewers into a cascade of defensive responses reflected by increased self-reported unpleasantness, reduced resources allocated to encoding, worsened recognition memory, and dampened emotional responses compared to messages depicting one attribute or neither. Findings from this study demonstrate the value of applying a motivated cognition theoretical framework in research on responses to emotional content in health messages and support previous research on defensive processing and message design of anti-tobacco messages.

Notes

1 A description of the stimuli is available upon request from the first author.

2 The message order variable listed in the design showed no interactions with the independent variables on the dependent variables, and therefore was eliminated from the reported analyses.

3 Accuracy does not take into account the foils in its computation because it is the hit rate (% correct targets). Sensitivity is a ratio of hits to false alarms, and it takes into account the ability of the viewer to discriminate targets from foils. Criterion bias indicates that confidence in the decision a participant makes of whether or not an item was previously seen. A conservative (higher value) criterion means that there will be fewer false alarms (i.e., saying “yes” to a foil), but also there will be more misses (i.e., saying “no” to a target). Conversely, if a person adopts a liberal (lower) criterion, there will be more hits (i.e., saying “yes” to targets), but there will also be more false alarms. Nonparametric measures for sensitivity (A′) and criterion bias (B″) were used.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 371.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.