Abstract
The theory of deliberate practice (Ericsson, Krampe, & Tesch-Römer, 1993) is predicated on the concept that the engagement in specific forms of practice is necessary for the attainment of expertise. The purpose of this paper was to examine the quantity and type of training performed by expert UE triathletes. Twenty-eight UE triathletes were stratified into expert, middle of the pack, and back of the pack groups based on previous finishing times. All participants provided detailed information regarding their involvement in sports in general and the three triathlon sports in particular. Results illustrated that experts performed more training than non-experts but that the relationship between training and performance was not monotonic as suggested by Ericsson et al. Further, experts' training was designed so periods of high training stress were followed by periods of low stress. However, early specialization was not a requirement for expertise. This work indicates that the theory of deliberate practice does not fully explain expertise development in UE triathlon.
Notes
1 These five training zones represent a conventional rating of training intensity that the athletes were familiar with and used as part of their training regimen.
a Hours Other is made up of the total hours spent in other sports minus time spent in swimming, cycling and running.
b Total Hours to Date includes training hours as a triathlete as well as the hours accumulated prior to beginning triathlon.
c Hours Triathlon is made up of the cumulative hours of training in swimming, cycling, and running.
2 The one exception is in the mid-pack group which reported a high level of swim training prior to beginning triathlon but is likely due to the inclusion of a near elite level swimmer who performed over 10 000 hours of swim training.