![Sample our Communication Studies journals, sign in here to start your access, 2013 & 2014 volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5927/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Information-Science2.jpg"})
Abstract
Elizabeth Gurley Flynn's controversial 1915 essay, Sabotage, reveals the rhetorical difficulty of integrating deterministic and hortatory approaches to the scene‐act ratio for purposes of absolution. Incorporating both materialistic and mystical perspectives in the same text resulted in incompatible rhetorical images of workers and their acts of sabotage.