599
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article: Clinical

Survival of patients with CD20-negative variants of large B-cell lymphoma: an analysis of the National Cancer Data Base

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1375-1383 | Received 27 Aug 2017, Accepted 22 Sep 2017, Published online: 11 Oct 2017
 

Abstract

Using records from the National Cancer Data Base, we studied overall survival of CD20-negative variants of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): primary effusion (PEL, N = 228), plasmablastic (PBL, N = 481), ALK-positive large B-cell (ALK + LBLC, N = 15), and human herpesvirus-8-positive DLBCL (HHV8 + DLBCL, N = 77). Three-year survival was 27% for PEL, 40% for PBL, 34% for ALK + LBCL, and 63% for HHV8 + DLBCL. Compared with unspecified DLBCL, and adjusting for clinical characteristics (including the HIV status), survival was significantly worse for PEL (hazard ratio [HR], 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31–1.90), PBL (HR 1.66; 95% CI, 1.41–1.95), and ALK + LBCL (HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.27–5.75), but not for HHV8 + DLBCL (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.54–1.45). The HIV status was not an independent prognostic factor in PEL, PBL, or HHV8 + DLBCL. Advanced stage was prognostic for PBL (p = .0002), but not for ALK + LBCL (p = .96), or HHV8 + DLBCL (p = .28). In PEL and PBL survival significantly differed according to primary site. Novel therapeutic approaches are urgently needed for these rare diseases.

Acknowledgments

Presented in part at the 58th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition, December 3–6, 2016, San Diego, CA. A. J. O. is supported by the American Society of Hematology Scholar Award. The data used in the study are derived from a de-identified NCDB file. The American College of Surgeons and the Commission on Cancer have not verified and are not responsible for the analytic or statistical methodology employed, or the conclusions drawn from these data by the investigator.

Potential conflict of interest

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2017.1387912.

Funding

This study was conducted using support from authors’ academic departments only.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,065.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.