243
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

End-of-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients: ΔSUV outperforms Deauville score

, , , , , & show all
Pages 2890-2898 | Received 15 Feb 2021, Accepted 19 Jun 2021, Published online: 05 Jul 2021
 

Abstract

In DLBCL, the Deauville scoring system (DS) is the standard for PET/CT response assessment. An alternative system, based on the semi-quantitative change in standardized uptake values, namely ΔSUVmax, has been reported to be more objective than the DS. We aimed to compare ΔSUVmax and DS for risk stratification of DLBCL patients on end-of-treatment (EoT) PET. 108 consecutive patients were included. 2-year EFS Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and Cox regression models were performed. 2-year EFS was significantly different between favorable ΔSUVmax (favΔ < −86.5%) and unfavorable ΔSUVmax (unfavΔ ≥ −86.5%) patients: 100.0% ± 0.0 versus 58.3% ± 14.2 (p = 0.001). On Cox multivariable regression, ΔSUVmax status was the only independent predictor of 2-year EFS, outperforming DS. Therefore, ΔSUVmax should be computed for non-responder patients, especially DS4, as the 2-year EFS is not different between responders and non-responders in the case of favΔ. Further studies are needed in order to confirm this hypothesis.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in this study were conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. According to European regulations, French observational studies without any additional therapy or monitoring procedures do not need ethics approval. However, we sought approval to collect data for our study from the national committee for data privacy and the National Commission on Informatics and Liberty (CNIL) with registration no. 2081250 v 0.

Informed consent

The patients provided their informed consent for their participation.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Helen Lapasset for English reviewing.

Disclosure of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, upon reasonable request.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,065.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.