ABSTRACT
Throughout its twenty years of existence, a Brazilian research network, RedeSist, has developed and improved the theoretical and methodological framework of National Systems of Innovation. The first aim of this article is to present RedeSist’s focusing device of Local Innovation and Production Systems (LIPS), a combination of the Systems of Innovation framework with the contributions of the Latin American Structuralist Approach and to explain the main tools devised to capture collective and systemic processes of production and innovation, taking into account that every LIPS is inserted in specific, local, regional, national and global systems. The second objective is to discuss the Brazilian experience in designing and implementing LIPS policies as part of its industrial and innovation policies. The concluding remarks attempt at recuperating the most important arguments of the discussion and at highlighting the advantages of creating and using contextualized and systemic theories, concepts, indicators and policy models.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1 In former works we detail some of the main conceptual approaches that target the territorial dimension of production and innovation structures aiming at exploring their main similarities and convergences and comparing them with the LIPS framework: Cassiolato and Lastres (Citation1999), Lastres and Cassiolato (Citation2005a, Citation2005b). Torre and Zimmermann (Citation2015) presented a comprehensive review of international literature on the subject.
2 It is worth mentioning that, in the first contribution to the OECD Expert Group on Science, Technology and Competitiveness, Freeman (Citation1982) argued that the performance of countries were tied to innovation and that factors beyond the realm of R&D and S&T organizations influenced significantly innovation performance of firms. Johnson, Edquist, and Lundvall (Citation2003) and Cassiolato and Lastres (Citation2008) argued about the importance of considering the broad notion for the analysis of systems of innovation.
3 In 1997, RedeSist organized its first seminar in Gramado (South of Brazil) bringing together Argentinian and Uruguayan researchers to discuss the value and possible use of the NSI approach to the reality of the Mercorsur countries. A second seminar was organized, in Rio de Janeiro in 2000, enlarging the participation of Latin-Americans and other specialists, around the world, working with the concept of NSI. Two books summarize these debates: Cassiolato and Lastres (Citation1999) (with chapters in Portuguese, Spanish and English) and Cassiolato, Lastres, and Maciel (Citation2003) (in English). In 2003, the Globelics network was created and, not for coincidence, its first seminar was also held in Rio de Janeiro. See www.redesist.ie.ufrj.br and www.globelics.org.
4 It is important to stress that in the same period, in Latin America, several similar works were developed particularly in Argentina (Boscherini, López, and Yoguel [Citation1999] and Moori-Koenig and Yoguel [Citation1999]); in Mexico (Dutrénit [Citation2003] and Vera-Cruz and Gil [Citation2003]) and in Costa Rica (Vargas [Citation2000] and Segura [Citation2000]).
9 Freeman’s (Citation1987) seminal work emphasized this integrate view in the three levels – micro, meso and macro – as well as their connections in the dynamic evolution of the Japanese National System of Innovation.
10 Erber (Citation1999) adds that, even though Schumpeter stressed the importance of finance for innovation, the neo-schumpeterian literature, when dealing with the macro dimension of innovation, has focused mostly on factors associated to credit.
11 An example, constantly pointed out in Latin American academic circles, of how the omission of such macro components may lead to problematic analysis and conclusions is the well-known comparison of Latin American and East Asian National Systems of innovation in the 1980s where these constraining factors, are not even mentioned, even if they were certainly determinants of technology and innovation development (Dosi, Freeman, and Fabiani Citation1994).
13 Specially the interest and exchange rates.
16 The external debt crisis and the hyperinflation of the 1980s led to the abandonment of public development planning and the pro-development development policies of post-war industrial development, with the country’s economic policies agenda concentrating on the short-term logics of tackling macroeconomic imbalances. For details see Cassiolato, Lastres, and Soares (Citation2014).
18 Main differences of these activities relate to the knowledge base and the patterns of appropriability, business models, structure and organization of companies and networks. To take the particular characteristics of the distinct activities into account has required several adaptations and improvements of all analytical tools, questionnairies and interview guides. See Falcón et al. (Citation2017).
19 In a review of almost 1500 papers presented in the first nine Globelics conferences, Cassiolato et al. (Citation2012), found that most of the papers that referred to the IS approach did not really adopt a systemic vision.
Cassiolato, J. E., and H. M. M. Lastres, eds. 1999. Globalização e Inovação Localizada: Experiências de Sistemas Locais no Mercosul. Brasília: IBICT. Lastres, H. M. M., and J. E. Cassiolato. 2005a. “Innovation Systems and Local Productive Arrangements: New Strategies to Promote the Generation, Acquisition and Diffusion of Knowledge.” Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice 7 (2–3): 172–187. doi: 10.5172/impp.2005.7.2-3.172 Lastres, H. M. M., and J. E. Cassiolato. 2005b. “Systems of Innovation, Clusters and Industrial Districts: Analytical and Policy Implications of Convergence and Differences in the Approaches.” Paper presented at the 3rd Globelics Conference, Pretoria, November 11–13. Torre, A., and J. B. Zimmermann. 2015. “Des Clusters aux Écosystèmes Industriels Locaux.” Revue d’Économie Industrielle 4: 13–38. doi: 10.4000/rei.6204 Freeman, C. 1982. “Technological Infrastructure and International Competitiveness.”, Paper submitted to the OECD ad hoc group on science, technology and competitiveness, Paris: OCDE. Johnson, B., C. Edquist, and B.-A. Lundvall. 2003. “Economic Development and the National System of Innovation Approach.” Paper presented at the 1st Globelics Conference. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, October 15–17. Cassiolato, J. E., and H. M. M. Lastres. 2008. “Discussing Innovation and Development: Converging Points between the Latin American School and the Innovation Systems Perspective?” Globelics Working Paper Series 01-08. Cassiolato, J. E., and H. M. M. Lastres, eds. 1999. Globalização e Inovação Localizada: Experiências de Sistemas Locais no Mercosul. Brasília: IBICT. Cassiolato, J. E., H. M. M. Lastres, and M. L. Maciel, eds. 2003. Systems of Innovation and Development: Evidence from Brazil. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Boscherini, F., M. López, and G. Yoguel. 1999. “Sistemas locales de innovacion y el desarollo de la capacidad inovativa de las firmas: un instrumiento de captación aplicado al caso de Rafaela.” In Globalização e Inovação Localizada: Experiências de Sistemas Locais no Mercosul, edited by J. E. Cassiolato and H. M. M. Lastres, 569–605. Brasília: IBICT. Moori-Koenig, V., and G. Yoguel. 1999. “El desarollo de capacidades inovativas de las firmas en um medio de escaso desarollo del sistema local de innovación.” In Globalização e Inovação Localizada: Experiências de Sistemas Locais no Mercosul, edited by J. E. Cassiolato and H. M. M. Lastres, 606–649. Brasília: IBICT. Dutrénit, G. 2003. “Desafios y oportunidades de las pequeñas y medianas empresas para sua integracion a redes de provedores: la maquila de autopartes en el norte de México.” In Pequena Empresa: Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Local, edited by H. M. M. Lastres, J. E. Cassiolato, and M. L. Maciel, 153–170. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará. Vera Cruz, A., and J. Gil. 2003. “Creación de Redes como um Mecanismo de Desarollo de Capacidades de los Proveedores Mexicanos de la Maquila: el Caso de la Industria del Maquinado.” In Pequena Empresa: Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Local, edited by H. M. M. Lastres, J. E. Cassiolato, and M. L. Maciel, 171–188. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará. Vargas, L. A. 2000. “Learning in a Niche Development Space: The Case of the Clean Energy Cluster in Costa Rica.” Paper presented at the Druid’s Summer Conference on the Learning Economy, Rebild, Denmark, June 15–17. Segura, O. 2000. Sustainable Systems of Innovation: The Central America Forest Sector. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press. Cassiolato, J. E., and H. M. M. Lastres, eds. 1999. Globalização e Inovação Localizada: Experiências de Sistemas Locais no Mercosul. Brasília: IBICT. Cassiolato, J. E., H. M. M. Lastres, M. Matos, and M. Szapiro. 2017. “Local Production and Innovation Systems in Brazil: A Balance of 20 Years.” Paper presented at the 15th. Globelics Conference, Athens, October 12–14. Lastres, H. M. M., J. E. Cassiolato, and M. L. Maciel. 2003. “Systems of Innovation for Development in the Knowledge Era: An Introduction.” In Systems of Innovation and Development: Evidence from Brazil, edited by J. E. Cassiolato, H. M. M. Lastres, and M. L. Maciel, 1–36. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Lastres, H. M. M., C. M. Garcez, C. R. Lemos, E. K. Barbosa, and W. A. Magalhães. 2014. “Innovation, Production and Innovation Systems and the BNDES’ Contribution.” In STI Policies for Development, edited by G. Crespi and G. Dutrénit, 87–108. Washington: Springer. Lastres, H. M. M., and J. E. Cassiolato. 2017. “Development and Innovation: Learning from the Legacies of Freeman and Furtado.” Innovation and Development 7 (2): 271–286. doi: 10.1080/2157930X.2017.1361057 Yoguel, G., and F. Boscherini. 2001. “El Desarrollo de las Capacidades Innovativas de las Firmas y el Rol del Sistema Territorial.” Desarrollo Economico – Revista de Ciencias Sociales 41 (161): 37–69. Lastres, H. M. M. 2003. “Systems of Innovation and Development.” Paper presented at the 1st Globelics Conference. Rio de Janeiro, November 16-18. Lastres, H. M. M., J. E. Cassiolato, and M. L. Maciel. 2003. “Systems of Innovation for Development in the Knowledge Era: An Introduction.” In Systems of Innovation and Development: Evidence from Brazil, edited by J. E. Cassiolato, H. M. M. Lastres, and M. L. Maciel, 1–36. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Cassiolato, J. E., and H. M. M. Lastres, eds. 1999. Globalização e Inovação Localizada: Experiências de Sistemas Locais no Mercosul. Brasília: IBICT. Cassiolato, J. E., H. M. M. Lastres, and M. L. Maciel, eds. 2003. Systems of Innovation and Development: Evidence from Brazil. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Freeman, C. 1987. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Frances Pinter. Erber, F. S. 1999. “O Sistema de Inovação em uma Economia Monetária: uma Agenda de Pesquisa.” In Globalização e Inovação Localizada: Experiências de Sistemas Locais no Mercosul, edited by J. E. Cassiolato and H. M. M. Lastres, 168–180. Brasília: IBICT. Dosi, G., C. Freeman, and S. Fabiani. 1994. “The Process of Economic Development: Introducing Some Stylized Facts and Theories on Technologies.” Firms and Institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change 3 (1): 1–45. doi: 10.1093/icc/3.1.1 Cassiolato, J. E., H. M. M. Lastres, and M. L. Maciel, eds. 2003. Systems of Innovation and Development: Evidence from Brazil. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Cassiolato, J. E., and H. M. M. Lastres. 2008. “Discussing Innovation and Development: Converging Points between the Latin American School and the Innovation Systems Perspective?” Globelics Working Paper Series 01-08. Cassiolato, J. E., H. M. M. Lastres, M. Matos, and M. Szapiro. 2017. “Local Production and Innovation Systems in Brazil: A Balance of 20 Years.” Paper presented at the 15th. Globelics Conference, Athens, October 12–14. Cassiolato, J. E., H. M. M. Lastres, and M. C. C. Soares. 2014. “The Brazilian National System of Innovation: Challenges to Sustainability and Inclusive Development.” In National Innovation Systems, Social Inclusion and Development: the Latin American Experience, edited by G. Dutrénit and J. Sutz, 68–101. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Cassiolato, J. E., H. M. M. Lastres, M. Matos, and M. Szapiro. 2017. “Local Production and Innovation Systems in Brazil: A Balance of 20 Years.” Paper presented at the 15th. Globelics Conference, Athens, October 12–14. Falcón, M. L., H. M. M. Lastres, J. E. Cassiolato, and M. C. Andreatta. 2017. “Por uma Política Industrial e de Inovação Baseada em APLs da Agroindústria Familiar.” In Arranjos Produtivos Locais: Referencial, Experiências e Políticas em 20 anos da RedeSist, edited by M. Matos, J. E. Cassiolato, H. M. M. Lastres, M. Szapiro, and C. Lemos, 161–192. Rio de Janeiro: E-papers. Cassiolato, J. E., M. Matos, H. M. M. Lastres, and I. S. Marcellino. 2012. “Innovation Systems and Development: The Use of the Framework Along the First Ten Years of the Globelics Conferences”. Paper presented at the 10th Globelics Conference, Hangzou, November 9–11. Szapiro, M., C. Lemos, H. M. M. Lastres, J. E. Cassiolato, and M. Vargas. 2017. “Panorama Histórico da RedeSist e Fundamentação Teórica da Abordagem de APL.” In Arranjos Produtivos Locais: Referencial, Experiências e Políticas em 20 Anos da RedeSist, edited by M. Matos, J. E. Cassiolato, H. M. M. Lastres, M. Szapiro, and C. Lemos, 31–60. Rio de Janeiro: E-papers. Cassiolato, J. E., H. M. M. Lastres, M. Matos, and M. Szapiro. 2017. “Local Production and Innovation Systems in Brazil: A Balance of 20 Years.” Paper presented at the 15th. Globelics Conference, Athens, October 12–14.