ABSTRACT
Prior research indicates that victim and crime characteristics shape homicide investigations, yet less is known about the effects of neighbourhood demographics. Drawing upon several theoretical perspectives, this study examines the neighbourhood context of homicide investigations. Multilevel logistic regressions disentangle the effects of covariates at the agency, neighbourhood, and individual level on homicide investigations in Los Angeles County, California. While several non-racial factors influence clearance outcomes, homicides occurring in areas with larger Black and Latino populations are less likely to be cleared. These findings highlight the importance of neighbourhood racial composition beyond victim race effects and have implications for the community context of criminal justice.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback. I would also wish to thank Mona Lynch, Ann Hironaka, and Carroll Seron for their insightful comments on earlier drafts. Special thanks to Dick O'Reilly, Doug Smith, and Sandra Poindexter for helping me access the data.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes
1 For brevity, ‘race’ is used instead of ‘race/ethnicity’, while the term ‘Latino’ rather than ‘Latino/a’ is used since most homicide victims are male.
2 Despite differences in the criminalisation of Blacks and Latinos, there are several points of convergence between the two groups. As such, I focus on the similarities between these groups given that ‘The public picture of Latinos and crime most closely resembles that of blacks. Latinos, too, are viewed as stealthy and criminal … ’ (Rome Citation2004, pp. 4–5).
3 While some studies find that racial composition does not affect crime stereotypes (Perkins and Taylor Citation2002, Mohan et al. Citation2011), these findings are fairly robust (Moeller Citation1989, Covington and Taylor Citation1991, Skogan Citation1995, Chiricos et al. Citation1997, Chiricos and Eschholz Citation2002, Welch Citation2007, Franzini et al. Citation2008, Scarborough et al. Citation2010, Quillian and Pager Citation2010, Drakulich Citation2012).
4 Riedel (Citation2008) offers a comprehensive review of the homicide arrest literature. A number of other studies address these issues (e.g., Regoeczi et al. Citation2000, Puckett and Lundman Citation2003, Litwin Citation2004, Lee Citation2005, Addington Citation2007, Alderden and Lavery Citation2007, Jiao Citation2007, Litwin and Xu Citation2007, Roberts Citation2007, Citation2014, Regoeczi et al. Citation2008, Roberts and Lyons Citation2011, Lundman and Myers Citation2012, Regoeczi and Jarvis Citation2013).
5 Accidental, vehicular, and justifiable homicides are excluded from this analysis. Of the 9442 homicides that occurred during the study period, 1364 were not geo-coded due to missing or incomplete address information. These cases were handled using list-wise deletion.
6 Publicly available homicide data sets do not contain neighbourhood information (e.g. State Court Processing Statistics; Offender-Based Transaction Statistics; Pennsylvania Sentencing Data; Supplementary Homicide Reports; Changing Patterns of Homicide and Social Policy, etc.).
7 Recognising that neighbourhoods are difficult to operationalise because ‘the very notion of a neighbourhood has been assigned a range of conceptual and operational definitions’ (Bellair Citation2000, Wells et al. Citation2006, p. 531), I use census tracts as proxies for neighbourhoods. Census tracts not only offer a standardised geographic unit of analysis (Quillian and Pager Citation2001, Slocum et al. Citation2010), but also tap into police and resident perceptions of neighbourhoods (Brooks-Gunn et al. Citation1993, Greene Citation2000). Moreover, census tracts are commonly used in the neighbourhood literature, including studies of policing (Jackson & Boyd, Jacobs and Helms, Citation1996, Jacobs and O'Brien Citation1998), homicide victimisation (Krivo and Peterson Citation1996, Kubrin and Herting Citation2003, Griffiths and Chavez Citation2004), police–community relations (Weitzer Citation1999, Sampson and Raudenbush Citation2004, Sampson Citation2009, Slocum et al. Citation2010), and criminal justice (Clear et al. Citation2003, Lynch and Sabol Citation2004, Wooldredge and Thistlethwaite Citation2004, Citation2002).
8 Consistent with prior research (Pare et al. Citation2007, Ousey and Lee Citation2010, Roberts Citation2014), police workload was calculated using the total number of sworn officers, rather than the number of homicide investigators, since all sworn officers can potentially contribute to clearance outcomes (Chaiken Citation1975, Cordner Citation1989).
9 As diagnostic measures, variance inflation factor (VIF) statistics were calculated based on single-level OLS versions of Model 2 (mean VIF = 2.04) and Model 4 (mean VIF = 2.11) with robust standard errors. Given that the VIF statistics from these ‘generic’ models are below standard cut-off levels (Hair et al. Citation1995), they suggest that standard errors are not biased by multicollinearity.
10 Recognising the potential interplay between victim demographics and social contextual factors (Wooldredge Citation2007), a supplementary model, not included here but available upon frequent, examined cross-level interactions. In this supplementary model, cross-level interactions between victim race and racial composition were not significant, indicating that neighbourhood effects do not depend upon victim race.
Rome, D., 2004. Black demons: the media's depiction of the African American male criminal stereotype. University Park, PA: Penn State Press. Perkins, D.D. and Taylor, R.B., 2002. Ecological assessments of community disorder: their relationship to fear of crime and theoretical implications. American journal of community psychology, 24 (1), 63–107. Mohan, J., Twigg, L., and Taylor, J., 2011. Mind the double gap using multivariate multilevel modelling to investigate public perceptions of crime trends. British journal of criminology, 51 (6), 1035–1053. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azr041 Moeller, G.L., 1989. Fear of criminal victimization: the effect of neighborhood racial composition. Sociological inquiry, 59 (2), 208–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1989.tb00101.x Covington, J. and Taylor, R.B., 1991. Fear of crime in urban residential neighborhoods. The sociological quarterly, 32 (2), 231–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1991.tb00355.x Skogan, W.G., 1995. Crime and the racial fears of white Americans. The annals of the American academy of political and social science, 539 (1), 59–71. doi: 10.1177/0002716295539001005 Chiricos, T., Hogan, M., and Gertz, M., 1997. Racial composition of neighborhood and fear of crime. Criminology, 35 (1), 107–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1997.tb00872.x Chiricos, T. and Eschholz, S., 2002. The racial and ethnic typification of crime and the criminal typification of race and ethnicity in local television news. Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 39 (4), 400–420. doi: 10.1177/002242702237286 Welch, K., 2007. Black criminal stereotypes and racial profiling. Journal of contemporary criminal justice, 23 (3), 276–288. doi: 10.1177/1043986207306870 Franzini, L., et al., 2008. Perceptions of disorder: contributions of neighborhood characteristics to subjective perceptions of disorder. Journal of environmental psychology, 28 (1), 83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.003 Scarborough, B.K., et al., 2010. Assessing the relationship between individual characteristics, neighborhood context, and fear of crime. Journal of criminal justice, 38 (4), 819–826. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.05.010 Quillian, L. and Pager, D., 2010. Estimating risk stereotype amplification and the perceived risk of criminal victimization. Social psychology quarterly, 73 (1), 79–104. doi: 10.1177/0190272509360763 Drakulich, K.M., 2012. Strangers, neighbors, and race a contact model of stereotypes and racial anxieties about crime. Race and justice, 2 (4), 322–355. doi: 10.1177/2153368712459769 Riedel, M., 2008. Homicide arrest clearances: a review of the literature. Sociology compass, 2 (4), 1145–1164. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00130.x Regoeczi, W.C., Kennedy, L.W., and Silverman, R.A., 2000. Uncleared homicides a Canada/United States comparison. Homicide studies, 4 (2), 135–161. doi: 10.1177/1088767900004002002 Puckett, J.L. and Lundman, R.J., 2003. Factors affecting homicide clearances: multivariate analysis of a more complete conceptual framework. Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 40 (2), 171–193. doi: 10.1177/0022427803251125 Litwin, K.J., 2004. A multilevel multivariate analysis of factors affecting homicide clearances. Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 41 (4), 327–351. doi: 10.1177/0022427803260269 Lee, C., 2005. The value of life in death: multiple regression and event history analyses of homicide clearance in Los Angeles County. Journal of criminal justice, 33 (6), 527–534. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2005.08.002 Addington, L.A., 2007. Hot vs. cold cases: examining time to clearance for homicides using NIBRS data. Justice research and policy, 9 (2), 87–112. doi: 10.3818/JRP.9.2.2007.87 Alderden, M.A. and Lavery, T.A., 2007. Predicting homicide clearances in Chicago investigating disparities in predictors across different types of homicide. Homicide studies, 11 (2), 115–132. doi: 10.1177/1088767907300505 Jiao, A.Y., 2007. Explaining homicide clearance: an analysis of Chicago homicide data 1965–1995. Criminal justice studies, 20 (1), 3–14. doi: 10.1080/14786010701241259 Litwin, K.J. and Xu, Y., 2007. The dynamic nature of homicide clearances a multilevel model comparison of three time periods. Homicide studies, 11 (2), 94–114. doi: 10.1177/1088767907300759 Roberts, A., 2007. Predictors of homicide clearance by arrest an event history analysis of NIBRS incidents. Homicide studies, 11 (2), 82–93. doi: 10.1177/1088767907300748 Roberts, A., 2014. Adjusting rates of homicide clearance by arrest for investigation difficulty modeling incident-and jurisdiction-level obstacles. Homicide studies, 19 (3), 273–300. doi: 10.1177/1088767914536984 Regoeczi, W.C., Jarvis, J., and Riedel, M., 2008. Clearing murders is it about time? Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 45 (2), 142–162. doi: 10.1177/0022427807313706 Roberts, A. and Lyons, C.J., 2011. Hispanic victims and homicide clearance by arrest. Homicide studies, 15 (1), 48–73. doi: 10.1177/1088767910397278 Lundman, R.J. and Myers, M., 2012. Explanations of homicide clearances: do results vary dependent upon operationalization and initial (time 1) and updated (time 2) data? Homicide studies, 16 (1), 23–40. doi:10.1177/1088767911428814 Regoeczi, W.C. and Jarvis, J.P., 2013. Beyond the social production of homicide rates: extending social disorganization theory to explain homicide case outcomes. Justice quarterly, 30 (6), 983–1014. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2011.639793 Bellair, P.E., 2000. Informal surveillance and street crime: a complex relationship. Criminology, 38 (1), 137–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00886.x Wells, W., et al., 2006. Neighborhood residents’ production of order: the effects of collective efficacy on responses to neighborhood problems. Crime & delinquency, 52 (4), 523–550. doi: 10.1177/0011128705284681 Quillian, L. and Pager, D., 2001. Black neighbors, higher crime? The role of racial stereotypes in evaluations of neighborhood crime. American journal of sociology, 107 (3), 717–767. doi: 10.1086/338938 Slocum, L., et al., 2010. Neighborhood structural characteristics, individual-level attitudes, and youths’ crime reporting intentions. Criminology, 48 (4), 1063–1100. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00212.x Brooks-Gunn, J., et al., 1993. Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development? American journal of sociology, 99 (2), 353–395. doi: 10.1086/230268 Greene, J.R., 2000. The road to community policing in Los Angeles: a case study. In: G.P. Alpert and A.R. Piquero, eds. Community policing: contemporary readings. 2nd ed. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 123–158. Jacobs, D. and Helms, R.E., 1996. Toward a political model of incarceration: a time-series examination of multiple explanation for prison admission rates. American journal of sociology, 102 (2), 323–357. doi: 10.1086/230949 Jacobs, D. and O'Brien, R.M., 1998. The determinants of deadly force: a structural analysis of police violence. American journal of sociology, 103 (4), 837–862. doi: 10.1086/231291 Krivo, L.J. and Peterson, R.D., 1996. Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime. Social forces, 75 (2), 619–650. doi: 10.2307/2580416 Kubrin, C.E. and Herting, J.R., 2003. Neighborhood correlates of homicide trends: an analysis using growth-curve modeling. Sociological quarterly, 44 (3), 329–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2003.tb00536.x Griffiths, E. and Chavez, J.M., 2004. Communities, street guns and homicide trajectories in Chicago, 1980–1995: merging methods for examining homicide trends across space and time. Criminology, 42 (4), 941–978. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00541.x Weitzer, R., 1999. Citizens’ perceptions of police misconduct: race and neighborhood context. Justice quarterly, 16 (4), 819–846. doi: 10.1080/07418829900094381 Sampson, R.J. and Raudenbush, S.W., 2004. Seeing disorder: neighborhood stigma and the social construction of ‘Broken Windows’. Social psychology quarterly, 67 (4), 319–342. doi: 10.1177/019027250406700401 Sampson, R.J., 2009. Disparity and diversity in the contemporary city: social (dis)order. The British journal of sociology, 60 (1), 1–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01211.x Slocum, L., et al., 2010. Neighborhood structural characteristics, individual-level attitudes, and youths’ crime reporting intentions. Criminology, 48 (4), 1063–1100. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00212.x Clear, T.R., et al., 2003. Coercive mobility and crime: a preliminary examination of concentrated incarceration and social disorganization. Justice quarterly, 20 (1), 33–64. doi: 10.1080/07418820300095451 Lynch, J.P. and Sabol, W.J., 2004. Assessing the effects of mass incarceration on informal social control in communities. Criminology & public policy, 3 (2), 267–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2004.tb00042.x Wooldredge, J. and Thistlethwaite, A., 2004. Bilevel disparities in court dispositions for intimate assault. Criminology, 42 (2), 417–456. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00525.x Wooldredge, J. and Thistlethwaite, A., 2002. Reconsidering domestic violence recidivism: conditioned effects of legal controls by individual and aggregate levels of stake in conformity. Journal of quantitative criminology, 18 (1), 45–70. doi: 10.1023/A:1013292812895 Pare, P., Felson, R.B., and Ouimet, M., 2007. Community variation in crime clearance: a multilevel analysis with comments on assessing police performance. Journal of quantitative criminology, 23 (3), 243–258. doi: 10.1007/s10940-007-9028-0 Ousey, G.C. and Lee, M.R., 2010. The southern culture of violence and homicide-type differentiation: an analysis across cities and time points. Homicide studies, 14 (3), 268–295. Roberts, A., 2014. Adjusting rates of homicide clearance by arrest for investigation difficulty modeling incident-and jurisdiction-level obstacles. Homicide studies, 19 (3), 273–300. doi: 10.1177/1088767914536984 Chaiken, J.M., 1975. The criminal investigation process: volume II: survey of municipal and county police departments. Santa Monica, CA: Rand. Cordner, G.W., 1989. Police agency size and investigative effectiveness. Journal of criminal justice, 17 (3), 145–155. doi: 10.1016/0047-2352(89)90015-9 Hair, J.F. Jr., et al., 1995. Multivariate data analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan. Wooldredge, J., 2007. Neighborhood effects on felony sentencing. Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 44 (2), 238–263. doi: 10.1177/0022427807299825 Additional information
Funding
This project was partially supported by the Proteus Fund [grant number 102938].