Article title: Integration of Subjective and Objective Usability Evaluation Based on ISO/IEC 15939: A Case Study for Traffic Supervision Systems
Authors: Ahlem Assila, Káthia Marçal de Oliveira, and Houcine Ezzedine
Journal: International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Bibliometrics: Volume 32, Issue 12, pages 931–955
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2016.1220068
The title appeared incorrectly as, “Integration of Subjective and Objective Usability Evaluation Based on IEC/IEC 15939: A Case Study for Traffic Supervision Systems” in the original online and print publications. The correct title should appear as:
“Integration of Subjective and Objective Usability Evaluation Based on ISO/IEC 15939: A Case Study for Traffic Supervision Systems”
In addition, several instances of “IEC/IEC” appear in the first two pages of text, but the correct spelling is “ISO/IEC.” The correct sentences should appear as:
“We apply the measurement information model defined by ISO/IEC 15939 with the use of indicators in an interactive system evaluation environment” (page 931, abstract).
“To that end, we propose to use the measurement information model defined by ISO/IEC 15939 (2007). This model links information needs with the entities being evaluated by the definition of measures and indicators. As defined by ISO/IEC 15939, we used indicator as a measure that provides an evaluation of specific attributes based on quality measures” (page 931, 4th paragraph).
“Section 4 presents the steps to define a quality indicator for usability purposes using the measurement information model from the ISO/IEC 15939, and then presents complete descriptions of four indicators” (page 932, 1st paragraph).
“The standard ISO/IEC 15939 (2007) integrates the use of indicators in a measurement information model (Figure 1)” (page 932, 2nd paragraph).
The publisher apologizes for this error.