2,897
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Generative Artificial Intelligence Acceptance Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Received 17 Aug 2023, Accepted 22 Nov 2023, Published online: 12 Dec 2023
 

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to formulate an acceptance scale grounded in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. The scale is designed to scrutinize students’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence (AI) applications. This tool assesses students’ acceptance levels toward generative AI applications. The scale development study was conducted in three phases, encompassing 627 university students from various faculties who have utilized generative AI tools such as ChatGPT during the 2022–2023 academic year. To evaluate the face and content validity of the scale, input was sought from professionals with expertise in the field. The initial sample group (n = 338) underwent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to explore the underlying factors, while the subsequent sample group (n = 250) underwent confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for the verification of factor structure. Later, it was seen that four factors comprising 20 items accounted for 78.349% of total variance due to EFA. CFA results confirmed that structure of the scale, featuring 20 items and four factors (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, and social influence), was compatible with the obtained data. Reliability analysis yielded Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.97, and the test–retest method demonstrated a reliability coefficient of 0.95. To evaluate the discriminative power of the items, a comparative analysis was conducted between the lower 27% and upper 27% of participants, with subsequent calculation of corrected item-total correlations. The results demonstrate that the generative AI acceptance scale exhibits robust validity and reliability, thus affirming its effectiveness as a robust measurement instrument.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Fatma Gizem Karaoglan Yilmaz

Fatma Gizem Karaoglan Yilmaz is an Associate Professor of Computer Technology and Information Systems at Bartin University. She is interested in distance education, flipped learning, interactive learning environments, human–computer interaction, virtual reality, augmented reality, and eye-tracking.

Ramazan Yilmaz

Ramazan Yilmaz is a Professor in the Department of Computer Technology & Information Systems at Bartin University in Turkey. He is interested in cyber psychology, smart learning environments, virtual reality and augmented reality, human–computer interaction, data mining, learning analytics, and eye tracking.

Mehmet Ceylan

Mehmet Ceylan is an Instructor in the Department of Communication Coordinator at Bartin University in Turkey. He is the head of this department.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 306.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.