ABSTRACT
Low staff support for schoolwide positive behavior interventions and supports (SWPBIS) is a barrier to implementation and sustainability. In this qualitative study, we identify staff opposed to SWPBIS among staff in 36 schools across 9 districts in western Washington. Nonsupportive staff (n = 44) are compared to supportive staff (n = 1,166) on demographic variables. Then, open-ended statements provided by nonsupportive staff are coded and analyzed to identify themes and develop an understanding of concerns about the SWPBIS initiative in their schools. Nonsupportive staff were concerned for the commitment and participation of all stakeholders, including staff, administrators, and students. Some sources of opposition were attributable to misunderstandings of SWPBIS and outright philosophical disagreements. Other sources of staff opposition were attributable not to the SWPBIS framework, but to school-level factors such as negative climate. We provide consultants with suggestions for engaging nonsupportive staff as well as directions for future research.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Ashli D. Tyre
Ashli D. Tyre, EdD, is an associate professor at Seattle University in Seattle, Washington. Her research focuses on schoolwide positive behavior support, supporting staff in the systemic change process, and community-based research.
Laura L. Feuerborn
Laura L. Feuerborn, PhD, is an associate professor at the University of Washington, Tacoma. Her research interests are in the areas of systemic change, schoolwide positive behavior supports, and social-emotional learning.
Note: The authors report that, to the best of their knowledge, neither they nor their affiliated institutions have financial or personal relationships or affiliations that could influence or bias the opinions, decisions, or work presented in this article.