Publication Cover
Psychological Inquiry
An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory
Volume 22, 2011 - Issue 4
1,572
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
COMMENTARIES

Discounting Their Own Success: A Case for the Role of Implicit Stereotypic Attribution Bias in Women's STEM Outcomes

Pages 291-295 | Published online: 02 Dec 2011
 

Acknowledgments

The stereotypic attribution bias research described in this article was supported by the National Science Foundation Gender in Science and Engineering Program (award no. HRD-0936434) awarded to the author.

Notes

Stereotypic attribution bias is assessed in terms of four subscores, representing “success internal difference” (the number of internal explanations given for male success behaviors subtracted from the number internal explanations given for female success behaviors), “success external difference” (the number of external explanations given for male success behaviors subtracted from the number of external explanations given for female success behaviors), “failure internal difference” (the number of internal explanations given for male failure behaviors subtracted from the number of internal explanations given for female failure behaviors), and “failure external difference” (the number of external explanations given for male failure behaviors subtracted from the number of external explanations given for female failure behaviors). The stereotypic attribution bias pattern is evinced in negative success internal difference scores, positive success external difference scores, positive failure internal difference scores, and negative failure external difference scores. Because stereotypic attribution bias was theorized to be evinced in this specific pattern of scores, “L” scores were computed from contrast weights as recommended by Furr and Rosenthal (Citation2003), that is, by multiplying these difference score means by contrast weights assigned according to predicted patterns of attribution (–1, 1, 1, –1). A positive L score indicated the degree to which participants showed the stereotypic attribution bias pattern. Negative L scores indicated that the participant showed the opposite of the stereotypic attribution bias pattern. Analysis is conducted on L scores, which reflect the degree to which respondents showed the predicted pattern of stereotypic attribution bias.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 444.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.