ABSTRACT
Research has found that public and nonprofit employees volunteer at a higher rate than their for-profit-sector counterparts, with the disparity typically explained as a behavioral consequence of their higher public service motivation (PSM). This article considers an alternative explanation that public and nonprofit jobs might offer greater formal avenues for participation, and hence that differences in volunteering might simply be an indicator of ease of access to such opportunities, rather than of inherent prosocial orientation. Examining whether individuals in different sectors use different pathways to access volunteer roles may improve our understanding of sectoral differences in prosocial behavior. This study accordingly examines how public, nonprofit, and for-profit private-sector employees access organizational volunteer roles. The results show a few significant differences in access to volunteer roles by occupation sector. The implications of these findings for voluntary management, corporate social responsibility research, and future research are discussed.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes
1 Volunteering by the self-employed and those who are not in labor force is outside of the scope of this study.
2 The listcoef, percent option is used to calculate percent change in odds for unit increase in X.
3 The likelihood ratio chi-square: 150.86, p < 0.000. The Small-Hsiao tests did not indicate IIA violation (Approach: χ2 = −40.780, p = 1.000; Formal: χ2 = 7.000, p = 1.000; Informal: χ2 = 29.243, p = 0.655; Other: χ2 = 13.776, p = 0.999). The variance of inflation (VIF) factors were well below the threshold value of 10.
4 The Small-Hsiao tests statistics indicated that the IIA assumption has not been violated (Colleagues: χ2 = −2124.182, p = 1.000; Asked: χ2 = −1126.511, p = 0.072; Other: χ2 = −2836.846, p = 1.000). (Long & Freese,).