620
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Empirical Papers

Mentalization-enhancing therapeutic interventions in the psychotherapy of anorexia nervosa: An analysis of use and influence on patients’ mentalizing capacity

, , ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 595-607 | Received 28 Jan 2022, Accepted 31 Oct 2022, Published online: 06 Dec 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Objective

Improvement in patients’ mentalizing capacities is considered a possible mechanism of change in psychotherapy. This improvement might take place via mentalization-enhancing interventions (MEIs) performed by psychotherapists. The study aimed to explore the use of MEIs in two evidence-based psychotherapeutic treatments for patients with anorexia nervosa (enhanced cognitive-behavior therapy, focal psychodynamic therapy) and their association with the patients’ capacity to mentalize in sessions (“in-session reflective functioning” / in-session RF). Additionally, it was explored, if the amount of MEIs used could either predict change in in-session RF or outcome (end of treatment, one year follow-up).

Method

84 audiotapes from psychotherapy sessions of 28 patients of the ANTOP-study (three sessions per patient) were transcribed and rated with both the MEI Rating Scale and the In-Session RF Scale by trained raters.

Results

MEIs were applied in both treatments. A moderate correlation between the amount of MEIs and patients’ in-session RF as well as its change over the course of treatment was found, but no relation to change in BMI or eating disorder symptoms.

Conclusion

A greater use of MEIs was related to patients’ in-session-mentalizing. However, there seems to be no simple relation between RF as shown in sessions and symptom change.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2022.2146542

Additional information

Funding

The ANTOP-study was funded by the BMBF (01GV0624). There was no funding of this secondary data analysis.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 200.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.