2,402
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Section on Student Writing Prize

Ethical Considerations for Psychologists Taking a Public Stance on Controversial Issues: The Balance Between Personal and Professional Life

Pages 265-278 | Published online: 06 Jun 2014
 

Abstract

Previous literature has documented the general issues psychologists often face while balancing their personal and professional lives. The struggle stems from attempting to satisfy the need to maintain a life outside of work while having the professional obligation to follow the American Psychological Association’s (APA’s) Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (Ethics Code) to prevent their personal lives from interfering with their professional roles and relationships. The present article analyzes the subject of psychologists taking a public position on controversial public issues. Although the APA Ethics Code does not restrict how psychologists conduct themselves during their personal time, taking a public stance on a controversial issue could potentially strain professional relationships and inadvertently reflect negatively on the profession. The present article examines ethical issues that (a) should be taken into account before psychologists take a public position on a controversial issue and (b) are in conflict with APA’s Ethics Code or current research.

Notes

1. 1For the purposes of this article, the American Psychological Association is denoted as APA and the American Psychiatric Association is spelled out when referenced.

2. 2Notably, “product” could be broadened to include public endorsement of a value or belief.

3. 3Of interest, one psychologist, who purported that his research provided evidence that homosexuality could be cured and whose work was used by many people and organizations to support their beliefs that homosexuality was a choice, recently published a letter to the editor of Archives of Behavior reassessing his research (Spitzer, Citation2003) and apologizing to the gay community for his unverified claims of the efficacy of reparative therapy (Spitzer, Citation2012).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 349.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.