Measuring students’ attitudes toward plagiarism

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the study is to validate a scale to measure attitudes toward plagiarism. The survey questionnaire was administered to a purposive sample of 300 graduate Ph.D. students from private, state, and central universities. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to validate attitudes and subjective norms toward plagiarism. The scale demonstrated good internal consistency, composite reliability, and construct validity. Positive attitudes toward plagiarism, negative attitudes toward plagiarism, and subjective norms demonstrated a high level of convergence among the items thereby supporting the convergent validity of these constructs. The study extends the theory of planned behavior to predict intentions to plagiarize. Positive attitudes, negative attitudes, and subjective norms were related to plagiarism. Positive attitudes toward plagiarism indicate an individual’s tolerance, acceptability, and positive perception toward an unethical task. Negative attitudes condemn plagiarism and the third dimension, subjective norms toward plagiarism, reflect the thinking and the occurrence of plagiarism and the acceptance of such behavior in academic and research settings.

KEYWORDS:

• Plagiarism
• negative attitude
• positive attitude
• subjective norms
• theory of planned behavior

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The data analyzed during the study are available in the following metadata record: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/89b78hcx3p/draft?a=3c33f274-1e78-4a29-b75d-cbc39f7405eb.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.