Evaluating Reliance on Narratives in the Psychological Study of Religious Experiences

Abstract

In studying religious and spiritual experiences (RSEs), psychologists of religion have relied heavily on narratives. How sound is this practice? Using the Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory (PCI), we diagnosed basic features of RSEs as narrated by 39 participants. This information permitted comparison with third-party ratings of narratives of the same experiences using the PCI's phenomenological categories. Analyzing participant ratings against baseline happy and ordinary experiences showed that the RSEs in our sample possess distinctive phenomenological features. Analyzing participant ratings against third-party ratings of RSE narratives disclosed significant and intelligible differences. Psychologists of religion should rely on RSE narratives where they are effective at communicating experiential content and supplement them with other approaches where narratives are less effective. Combining best practices from both approaches yields a more complete description of RSEs.

Notes

^aSignificant difference between happy and ordinary.

^bSignificant difference between happy and religious.

^cSignificant difference between ordinary and religious.

*Significant at the .05 level.

^aSignificant difference between happy and ordinary.

^bSignificant difference between happy and religious.

^cSignificant difference between ordinary and religious.