Abstract
The bulk of instructional communication research to date examines communication among teachers and students in conventional classroom contexts. Although past and present research is prolific and informative, it is also somewhat limiting. With a specific unifying focus on affective, cognitive, and behavioral learning as outcome variables, we begin this article with a brief history of instructional communication research, as well as examples of research and practice in conventional classroom settings. We then outline, review, and explain four distinct contexts where we believe future instructional communication research and practice is likely to be fruitful: risk and crisis situations, technology-enhanced environments, digital games, and forensics education.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Deanna D. Sellnow
Deanna D. Sellnow (PhD, University of North Dakota) is the Gifford Blyton Endowed Professor of Communication and Assistant Provost for Transformative Learning, University of Kentucky.
Anthony Limperos
Anthony Limperos (PhD, Penn State University) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Kentucky.
Brandi N. Frisby
Brandi N. Frisby (PhD, West Virginia University) is an Associate Professor in Instructional Communication and Research at the University of Kentucky.
Timothy L. Sellnow
Timothy L. Sellnow (PhD, Wayne State University) is a Professor in the School of Information Science at the University of Kentucky.
Patric R. Spence
Patric R. Spence (PhD, Wayne State University) is an Associate Professor in the School of Information Science, and Instructional Communication & Research at the University of Kentucky.
Edward Downs
Edward Downs (PhD, Pennsylvania State University) is an Associate Professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Minnesota Duluth.