This essay is a reflexive study of congressional ghostwriting. A prominent politician, Robert Michel (R‐Ill.), and a prominent political speechwriter, William Gavin, reflect on one another's roles in the process of speech composition. Emphasis is on the interpersonal relationship between the principal and his ghost and how that relationship structures and defines the composition process.
Building the speechwriter‐principal relationship: Minority leader Robert Michel confronts his ghost
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.