This essay examines Salmon P. Chase's Senate oration against the Kansas‐Nebraska Act of 1854, which was influential in convincing many Northerners that opposition to the extension of slavery was sanctioned by the Founding Fathers. The argument herein is that this shift in Northern opinion, which was critical to the legitimation of the free soil doctrine which underlay the antebellum Republican Party, was advanced by Chase's skillful deployment of historical narrative as a vehicle for ideological transformation. The force of Chase's narrative, it is argued, came from the pervasive assumption that the origins of a community inscribe its essential character. This essay examines a situated instance of this narration of essence in order to account for an important moment in rhetorical history and to shed light upon the workings of an important rhetorical form.
The narration of essence: Salmon P. Chase's senate oration against the Kansas‐Nebraska act
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.