How does a person know that what is being taught is important enough to be part of future behavior? Instrumental to answering this important question may require taking a closer look at the relationship between what is learned and how that learning is valued. Bloom and Krathwohl's cognitive affective domains provide an integrated approach to understanding this process. By employing a taxonomy of behavioral objectives, the criminal justice educator can monitor intrinsic and extrinsic factors in learning. It is the relationship between thought and amity that adds substance to education. Combining the two has proven to enhance instruction.
Cognitive and affective minds: A necessary marriage in criminal justice education
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.